Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

PACIFIC WILDLIFE PROJECT

PACIFIC WILDLIFE PROJECT (California) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $45,238 to it, the largest being PAYPAL CHARITABLE GIVING FUND ($25,051). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 62% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2021
$30k
Funders on record
5
Grants received
$45k
Net assets
$136k
2/5 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 72%
01What it does

What Pacific Wildlife Project does

Mission

Wildlife rescue, medical care and rehabilitation of native animals; public outreach and education to foster a humane ethic towards wildlife and all animals and encourage conservation and responsible stewardship of the environment and all animals. Set an active example of humane care and protection of wildlife and all animals and provide safe haven and sanctuary to all animals in need of rescue and treatment of abuse or injury.

As stated on its FY2021 Form 990-EZ.

Programs

  1. Animal protection and welfare;Provided animal rescue, medical care and rehabilitation, return to the wild or sanctuary placement for 900 native and domestic animals. Conducted field rescues of native and domestic animals in peril, Advised the public in wildlife encounters, nuisance situation, safety and management; Gave direct medical aid and hospice care and conditioning for recovery and return to the wild, Gave medical aid and rehabilitative and hospice aid to endangered seabird species and to conduct supportive services in the public interest in conservation, research and education to support its humane mission of wildlife and environmental conservation and protection

    $22,717 spentof which $37,740 as grants
    100% of program spending
  2. Education Purpose: Operated year round telephone and online helpline education and information portal. Publish online educational seasonal and topical information to promote animal protection and environmental stewardship. Provided consultations and training and publications to animal care facilities, hospitals and to animal welfare organizations. Presented Education exhibits and community centers, animal shelters and schools and libraries to promote animal welfare, environmental protection and conservation.

    $0 spent
    0% of program spending
  3. Scientific Research study and Medical support; Provided medical management to ailing animals, Maintained medical data compilations, established baselines of care and treatment for specialized incidents. Published articles and monographs for use by shelters and animal facilities and for review by the general public.

    $0 spent
    0% of program spending

The 3 programs described on its FY2020 Form 990-EZ. Program spending in total: $22,717.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($39k) Expenses 100 ($48k) Net assets 100 ($172k)2018 Revenue 71 ($28k) Expenses 84 ($40k) Net assets 96 ($165k)2019 Revenue 60 ($23k) Expenses 83 ($40k) Net assets 86 ($149k)2020 Revenue 96 ($38k) Expenses 75 ($36k) Net assets 87 ($151k)2021 Revenue 76 ($30k) Expenses 92 ($44k) Net assets 79 ($136k)
20172018201920202021
Revenue (76)Expenses (92)Net assets (79)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2018 to 2019, from $165k to $149k (−10%).

$172k
$165k
$149k
$151k
$136k
20172018201920202021
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

100% of PACIFIC WILDLIFE PROJECT’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (100% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 6,580 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 5 reported years ran a deficit.

−$9k
’17
−$12k
’18
−$17k
’19
$2k
’20
−$14k
’21
43
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Kara McLeod

CEO

As listed on its FY2020 Form 990-EZ.

03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base held at 1 funder, grant income fell $1k → $777.

Funder
'17
'20
'21
'22
'23
total
Hope for Pawsunclassified
$15k
funders
1
3
2
3
1

2 of 5 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 62% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of PACIFIC WILDLIFE PROJECT’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

PACIFIC WILDLIFE PROJECT leans on a few funders — its largest provides 55% of grant income and the top three 95%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

95% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund PACIFIC WILDLIFE PROJECT.

55%
largest funder
95%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2020 55% · 2021 91% · 2022 71% · 2023 100% — broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

62% of PACIFIC WILDLIFE PROJECT's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $17k that is directly attributable, 100% of it comes from California funders.

CA

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’20
’22
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $28k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

PACIFIC WILDLIFE PROJECT's revenue fell 24% between 2017 and 2021.

Operating margin−48% · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)−7% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 4,305 animals nonprofits under $100k, FY2021

Organizations like PACIFIC WILDLIFE PROJECT

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for PACIFIC WILDLIFE PROJECT: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds PACIFIC WILDLIFE PROJECT?
PACIFIC WILDLIFE PROJECT (California) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $45,238 to it, the largest being PAYPAL CHARITABLE GIVING FUND ($25,051). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 62% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does PACIFIC WILDLIFE PROJECT have?
IRS filings report 5 organizations giving $45,238 in grants to PACIFIC WILDLIFE PROJECT, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of PACIFIC WILDLIFE PROJECT?
PAYPAL CHARITABLE GIVING FUND is the largest funder on record, with $25,051 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like PACIFIC WILDLIFE PROJECT find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Pacific Wildlife Project →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2021 (financials across 2017–2021), and the filings of 5 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing