· Private foundation
Hermann Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k33 grants · $92k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $95k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $680k
- $250k+2 grants · $2.0M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ST LOUIS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $1,000,000 |
| WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY | $1,000,000 |
| THE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION | $200,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI - ST LOUIS | $160,000 |
| MCLAREN NORTHERN MICHIGAN FOUNDATION | $120,000 |
| MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN | $100,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS | $100,000 |
| SANTA BARBARA BOWL FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| MAC SPORTS FOUNDATION(IN-KIND DONATION) | $22,917 |
| LAGUNA BLANCA SCHOOL | $16,000 |
| MAC SPORTS FOUNDATION | $11,000 |
| ONE805 INC | $10,000 |
| SANTA BARBARA COTTAGE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| KEYWAY CENTER FOR DIVERSION AND REENTRY (CENTER FOR WOMEN IN TRANSITION) | $7,500 |
| LAGUNA BLANCA SCHOOL | $7,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 74% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.
48 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2024, 27 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $89k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SLST LOUIS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION5× · 2020–2024 · $12M · revenue +401%
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY2× · 2020–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +16%- CCONCORDANCE4× · 2020–2023 · $877k · revenue +76%
Funded once
THE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $200k · revenue +28%- OBOPERATION BRIGHTSIDE INC DBA BRIGHTSIDE ST LOUISgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +44%
- SYSTL YOUTH JOBSgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +120%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…
To serve as the sole member of the various health care and supporting organizations that comprise st. mary's healthcare system for children
To improve, maintain and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.
Sfn's mission is to: 1. advance the understanding of the brain and the nervous system by bringing together scientists of all segments of neuroscience, by facilitating the integration of research directed at all levels of biological…
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Sarasota memorial healthcare foundation is the philanthropic partner that helps sarasota memorial health care system bring world-class care to our community.
The foundation cultivates generosity by taking action on the greatest civic, social, and economic needs partnering with nonprofits, facilitating grantmaking, driving research and advocacy, and providing services to donors seeking to make a…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Missouri and Kansas and the most unlike its peers is Great Meadows Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 24. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
107 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 107 of the 140 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ST LOUIS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds CONCORDANCE ↗
- Who funds MCLAREN NORTHERN MICHIGAN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC ↗
- Who funds THE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SANTA BARBARA BOWL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital ↗
- Who funds LAGUNA BLANCA SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds ST LOUIS ART MUSEUM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Town of Palm Beach United Way Inc ↗
- Who funds MAC SPORTS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds The Society of the Four Arts Inc ↗
- Who funds SANSUM CLINIC ↗
- Who funds CANCER FOUNDATION OF SANTA BARBARA ↗
- Who funds OPERATION BRIGHTSIDE INC DBA BRIGHTSIDE ST LOUIS ↗
- Who funds AUTISM SPEAKS INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ALS THERAPY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Mary Institute and St Louis Country Day School ↗
- Who funds SUNSHINE MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds The Frick Collection ↗
- Who funds The Palm Beach Police and Fire Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds ONE805 INC ↗
- Who funds INSTITUTE FOR NEURODEGENERATIVE DISORDERS ↗
- Who funds Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital Foundation ↗
- Who funds STL YOUTH JOBS ↗
- Who funds PARAQUAD INC ↗
- Who funds STREETSQUASH INC ↗
- Who funds THE BUSCH WILDLIFE SANCTUARY INC ↗
- Who funds HOPE HAPPENS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation Inc · The Lilly Christy Busch Hermann Foundation · St Louis Community Foundation · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · World Wide Technology Foundation · Youthbridge Community Foundation · Pershing Charitable Trust · Moneta Group Charitable Foundation · Sander Foundation · Centene Foundation · Tsf · Brown Dana Charitable Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Hermann Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Naval Aviation Museum Foundation Inc — 13% of income from government
- The Trustees of Princeton University — 11% of income from government
- Als Therapy Development Foundation Inc — 8% of income from government
- Florida Sheriffs Association Inc — 4% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Hermann Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Hermann Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.