Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Herbert O Wolfe Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$113k
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$278kInternational$203kPhilanthropy$76kCivil Rights$74kReligion$59kHuman Services$56kArts & Culture$51kEnvironment$38kOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k18 grants · $48k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $65k
$2,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$17k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC ( BETH ISRAEL LAHEY HEALTH)FOR DR$30,000
MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH$15,000
JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES OF SAN FRANCISCOTHE PENINSULAMARIN & S$10,000
BOCA RATON REGIONAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION- FOR LEAGUE OF RIBBONS LYNN CANCER$10,000
LOUIS D BRANDEIS CENTER INC$8,000
CONGREGATION BETH SHOLOM - FOR SAN FRANCISCO CA CENTER FOR LIFELONG LEARNIN$8,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MOGEN DAVID ADOM (AFMDA)$6,000
PASADENA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION - MATTHEW SCHWARTZ MEMORIAL FUND$4,000
THE SECOND STEP INC$4,000
COMBINED JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES (CJP)$3,000
MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION$2,000
FARE (FOOD ALLERGY RESEARCH & EDUCATION)$2,000
JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE WALTHAM MA$2,000
COLUMBIABARNARD HILLEL$1,000
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN HILLEL$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–23, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 17% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%FORGET-ME-NOT CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $6k → 9%ART SPARK TEXAS: $3k → 10%FORGET-ME-NOT CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $3k → 9%FORGET-ME-NOT CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $3k → 9%FORGET-ME-NOT CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $3k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
WA
MN
NY
MA
OH
PA
CT
CA
UT
MO
VA
MD
DE
DC
HI
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$670k · 33 repeat orgs$183k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +68% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.

33 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 27 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
25

Total granted

$670k
$98k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+68%
+7%

Still filing today

64%
32%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 25% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $85k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureEnvironmentEducationInternationalHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH
    8× · 2018–2025 · $80k · revenue +313%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
    8× · 2017–2024 · $70k · revenue +206%
  • TL
    The Louis D Brandeis Center Inc
    4× · 2022–2025 · $43k · revenue +474%

Funded once

  • IF
    INSTITUTE FOR THE STUDY OF GLOBAL ANTISEMITISM AND POLICYgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $31k · revenue +405%
  • BI
    BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%
  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE
    one grant, 2024 · $8k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Israel Innovation Fund Inc

Our vision is to reignite the zionist spirit and meet the needs of jewish civilization in the twenty-first century by connecting people around the world through the vibrancy and creativity of contemporary israeli culture.

Arts & Culture
2
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

3
International Biomedical Research Alliance

Our mission is to invest in and accelerate the development of the most promising future leaders in biomedical research with global impact.

Health
4
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
5
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Foundation for Jewish Philanthropies Inc

See schedule othe organization is a not-for-profit, public charity established in 1911 to provide for the quality and continuity of jewish life in western new york and around the world through private philanthropy. the foundation seeks,…

Philanthropy
8
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

9
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
11
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Family & Children's Service Inc and the most unlike its peers is Ocean Conservancy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyJewish Community FederationsCommunity Health CentersChild and Family ServicesCommunity Arts OrganizationsClassical Music EnsemblesGovernment Accountability R…Education Equity LeadershipCancer Support OrganizationsLand Conservation Organizat…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%11%10–20yr16%42%20–35yr13%22%35–55yr16%22%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%1%5–10yr19%12%10–20yr16%36%20–35yr13%34%35–55yr16%17%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/38
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,527

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 77 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/34
Grantees still filing
19/34
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CAMERA (COMMITTEE FOR ACCURACY IN MIDDLE EAST REPORTING AND ANALYSIS) — $40,000 · OtherCAMERA (COMMITTEE FOR ACCURACY IN MIDDLE EAST REPORTING AND ANALYSIS…CAMERA (Committee For Accuracy in Mideast Reporting in America) — $40,000 · OtherCAMERA (Committee For Accuracy in Mideast Reporting in America)PKD Foundation — $40,000 · OtherPKD FoundationTHE CHILDREN'S ORCHESTRA SOCIETY INC — $39,500 · OtherTHE CHILDREN'S ORCHESTRA SOCIETY INCPOLYCYSTIC KIDNEY DISEASE FOUNDATION — $34,000 · OtherPOLYCYSTIC KIDNEY DISEASE FOUNDATIONBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC ( BETH ISRAEL LAHEY HEALTH)FOR DR — $30,000 · OtherBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC ( BETH ISRAEL LAHEY HEALTH)…FIDF (FRIENDS OF THE IDF) — $23,000 · OtherSEA TURTLE CONSERVATION LEAGUE OF SINGER ISLAND INC — $23,000 · OtherINSTITUTE FOR THE STUDY OF GLOBAL ANTISEMITISM AND POLICY — $31,000 · OtherINSTITUTE FOR THE STUDY OF GLOBAL ANTISEMITISM AND POLICYAMERICANS FOR BEN-GURION UNIVERSITY INC — $25,000 · Other+52 more — $234,500 · Other+52 moreTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH — $80,000 · HealthTHE MICHAEL …SIEGEL RARE NEUROIMMUNE ASSOCIATION — $13,000 · HealthSIEGEL RARE …BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC — $10,000 · HealthBETH ISRAEL …+1 more — $2,000 · HealthPasadena Community Foundation — $46,000 · PhilanthropyPasadena …Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc — $23,000 · PhilanthropyCombined …PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC — $6,000 · PhilanthropyPEF ISRAE…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $70,000 · International+1 more — $1,000 · InternationalThe Louis D Brandeis Center Inc — $43,000 · Crime & LegalBoca Raton Regional Hospital Foundation Inc — $38,000 · Community ImprovementSouthern Utah Wilderness Alliance — $27,000 · EnvironmentOCEAN CONSERVANCY — $5,500 · EnvironmentMASSACHUSETTS AUDUBON SOCIETY INC — $2,500 · Environment+1 more — $1,000 · Environment
Other$560,000Health$105,000Philanthropy$75,000International$71,000Crime & Legal$43,000Community Improvement$38,000Environment$36,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH — $80,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $70,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPasadena Community Foundation — $46,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetThe Louis D Brandeis Center Inc — $43,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetPKD Foundation — $40,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S ORCHESTRA SOCIETY INC — $39,500 over 7y, 2.8% of budgetBoca Raton Regional Hospital Foundation Inc — $38,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR THE STUDY OF GLOBAL ANTISEMITISM AND POLICY — $31,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetSouthern Utah Wilderness Alliance — $27,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICANS FOR BEN-GURION UNIVERSITY INC — $25,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCombined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc — $23,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRAW ART WORKS INC — $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetForget Me Not Childrens Services — $15,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetSIEGEL RARE NEUROIMMUNE ASSOCIATION — $13,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetINNOVATIONS FOR POVERTY ACTION A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $11,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD ALLERGY RESEARCH & EDUCATION INC — $7,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBrothers for Life — $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC — $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY — $5,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL FOUNDATION OF CAMBRIDGE INC — $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetKEKAHU FOUNDATION INC DBA KKCR — $5,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetSONOMA FAMILY MEAL — $5,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SECOND STEP INC — $4,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSUCCESS FOR ALL FOUNDATION INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetArt Spark Texas — $3,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetARTS FOR THE AGING INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCOLUMBIABARNARD HILLEL INC — $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS AUDUBON SOCIETY INC — $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NATAL INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPOWERS MUSIC SCHOOL INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMidcoast Conservancy — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
  • Who funds Pasadena Community Foundation
  • Who funds The Louis D Brandeis Center Inc
  • Who funds PKD Foundation
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S ORCHESTRA SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds Boca Raton Regional Hospital Foundation Inc
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR THE STUDY OF GLOBAL ANTISEMITISM AND POLICY
  • Who funds Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance
  • Who funds AMERICANS FOR BEN-GURION UNIVERSITY INC
  • Who funds Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc
  • Who funds RAW ART WORKS INC
  • Who funds Forget Me Not Childrens Services
  • Who funds SIEGEL RARE NEUROIMMUNE ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds INNOVATIONS FOR POVERTY ACTION A NONPROFIT CORPORATION
  • Who funds BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC
  • Who funds FOOD ALLERGY RESEARCH & EDUCATION INC
  • Who funds Brothers for Life
  • Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC
  • Who funds OCEAN CONSERVANCY
  • Who funds HILLEL FOUNDATION OF CAMBRIDGE INC
  • Who funds KEKAHU FOUNDATION INC DBA KKCR

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY16.4× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Herbert O Wolfe Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 6%
  • The Second Step Inc26% of income from government
  • Raw Art Works Inc7% of income from government
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc6% of income from government
  • Arts for the Aging Inc2% of income from government
  • Jewish Family & Children's Service Inc1% of income from government
  • Massachusetts Audubon Society Inc1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Herbert O Wolfe Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Herbert O Wolfe Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 77 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph