Skip to content

· Private foundation

Herbert O Wolfe Foundation Inc

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$113k
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$278kInternational$203kPhilanthropy$76kCivil Rights$74kReligion$59kHuman Services$56kArts & Culture$51kEnvironment$38kOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k18 grants · $48k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $65k
$2,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC ( BETH ISRAEL LAHEY HEALTH)FOR DR$30,000
MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH$15,000
JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES OF SAN FRANCISCOTHE PENINSULAMARIN & S$10,000
BOCA RATON REGIONAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION- FOR LEAGUE OF RIBBONS LYNN CANCER$10,000
LOUIS D BRANDEIS CENTER INC$8,000
CONGREGATION BETH SHOLOM - FOR SAN FRANCISCO CA CENTER FOR LIFELONG LEARNIN$8,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MOGEN DAVID ADOM (AFMDA)$6,000
PASADENA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION - MATTHEW SCHWARTZ MEMORIAL FUND$4,000
THE SECOND STEP INC$4,000
COMBINED JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES (CJP)$3,000
FARE (FOOD ALLERGY RESEARCH & EDUCATION)$2,000
MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION$2,000
JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE WALTHAM MA$2,000
TEMPLE EMANUEL OF NEWTON MA$1,000
CHABAD - UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA - THE ROHR CENTER FOR JEWISH STUDENT LIFE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–23, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 17% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%FORGET-ME-NOT CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $6k → 9%ART SPARK TEXAS: $3k → 10%FORGET-ME-NOT CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $3k → 9%FORGET-ME-NOT CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $3k → 9%FORGET-ME-NOT CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $3k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
WA
MN
NY
MA
OH
PA
CT
CA
UT
MO
VA
MD
DE
DC
HI
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$670k · 33 repeat orgs$183k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +49% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

33 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 27 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
25

Total granted

$670k
$98k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+18%

Still filing today

64%
32%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 25% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $85k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureEnvironmentEducationInternationalHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH
    8× · 2018–2025 · $80k · revenue +479%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
    8× · 2017–2024 · $70k · revenue +206%
  • TL
    The Louis D Brandeis Center Inc
    4× · 2022–2025 · $43k · revenue +452%

Funded once

  • IF
    INSTITUTE FOR THE STUDY OF GLOBAL ANTISEMITISM AND POLICYgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $31k · revenue +405%
  • BI
    BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +10%
  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE
    one grant, 2024 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
3
Food Allergy Science Initiative Inc

To accelerate the development of breakthrough discoveries that will transform the lives of people living with food allergies.

—
4
Alliance for Regenerative Medicine

The alliance for regenerative medicine (arm) is the preeminent global advocate for regenerative and advanced therapies. arm fosters research, development, investment and commercialization of transformational treatments and cures for…

Health
5
The Lieber Institute Inc

The mission of the institute is to translate basic genetic and molecular mechanisms of schizophrenia and related developmental brain disorders into clinical advances that change the lives of affected individuals. it is catalyzing a new…

Health
6
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
7
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
8
Society for Neuroscience

Sfn's mission is to: 1. advance the understanding of the brain and the nervous system by bringing together scientists of all segments of neuroscience, by facilitating the integration of research directed at all levels of biological…

Health
9
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
10
International Biomedical Research Alliance

Our mission is to invest in and accelerate the development of the most promising future leaders in biomedical research with global impact.

Health
11
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
12
American Friends of Hebrew University Inc

Support the hebrew univ. of jerusalem, israel's foremost center of higher edu. & research.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc; the most unlike its peers is Ocean Conservancy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 77 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/34
Grantees still filing
21/34
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CAMERA (COMMITTEE FOR ACCURACY IN MIDDLE EAST REPORTING AND ANALYSIS): $40,000 · OtherCAMERA (COMMITTEE FOR ACCURACY IN MIDDLE EAST REPORTING AND ANALYSIS…CAMERA (COMMITTEE FOR ACCURACY IN MIDEAST REPORTING IN AMERICA): $40,000 · OtherCAMERA (COMMITTEE FOR ACCURACY IN MIDEAST REPORTING IN AMERICA)PKD Foundation: $40,000 · OtherPKD FoundationTHE CHILDREN'S ORCHESTRA SOCIETY INC: $39,500 · OtherTHE CHILDREN'S ORCHESTRA SOCIETY INCPOLYCYSTIC KIDNEY DISEASE FOUNDATION: $34,000 · OtherPOLYCYSTIC KIDNEY DISEASE FOUNDATIONBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC ( BETH ISRAEL LAHEY HEALTH)FOR DR: $30,000 · OtherBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC ( BETH ISRAEL LAHEY HEALTH)…FIDF (FRIENDS OF THE IDF): $23,000 · OtherSEA TURTLE CONSERVATION LEAGUE OF SINGER ISLAND INC: $23,000 · OtherINSTITUTE FOR THE STUDY OF GLOBAL ANTISEMITISM AND POLICY: $31,000 · OtherINSTITUTE FOR THE STUDY OF GLOBAL ANTISEMITISM AND POLICYAMERICANS FOR BEN-GURION UNIVERSITY INC: $25,000 · Other+52 more: $234,500 · Other+52 moreTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $80,000 · HealthTHE MICHAEL …SIEGEL RARE NEUROIMMUNE ASSOCIATION: $13,000 · HealthSIEGEL RARE …BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC: $10,000 · HealthBETH ISRAEL …+1 more: $2,000 · HealthPasadena Community Foundation: $46,000 · PhilanthropyPasadena …Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc: $23,000 · PhilanthropyCombined …PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $6,000 · PhilanthropyPEF ISRAE…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $70,000 · International+1 more: $1,000 · InternationalThe Louis D Brandeis Center Inc: $43,000 · Crime & LegalBoca Raton Regional Hospital Foundation Inc: $38,000 · Community ImprovementSouthern Utah Wilderness Alliance: $27,000 · EnvironmentOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $5,500 · EnvironmentMASSACHUSETTS AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $2,500 · Environment+1 more: $1,000 · Environment
Other$560,000Health$105,000Philanthropy$75,000International$71,000Crime & Legal$43,000Community Improvement$38,000Environment$36,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $80,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $70,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPasadena Community Foundation: $46,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetThe Louis D Brandeis Center Inc: $43,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetPKD Foundation: $40,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S ORCHESTRA SOCIETY INC: $39,500 over 7y, 2.8% of budgetBoca Raton Regional Hospital Foundation Inc: $38,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR THE STUDY OF GLOBAL ANTISEMITISM AND POLICY: $31,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetSouthern Utah Wilderness Alliance: $27,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICANS FOR BEN-GURION UNIVERSITY INC: $25,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCombined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc: $23,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRAW ART WORKS INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetForget Me Not Childrens Services: $15,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetSIEGEL RARE NEUROIMMUNE ASSOCIATION: $13,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetINNOVATIONS FOR POVERTY ACTION A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $11,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD ALLERGY RESEARCH & EDUCATION INC: $7,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBrothers for Life: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $5,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKEKAHU FOUNDATION INC DBA KKCR: $5,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL FOUNDATION OF CAMBRIDGE INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSONOMA FAMILY MEAL: $5,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTHE SECOND STEP INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSUCCESS FOR ALL FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOLUMBIABARNARD HILLEL INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetARTS FOR THE AGING INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetArt Spark Texas: $3,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMidcoast Conservancy: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPOWERS MUSIC SCHOOL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NATAL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
  • Who funds Pasadena Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds The Louis D Brandeis Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds PKD Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S ORCHESTRA SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds Boca Raton Regional Hospital Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR THE STUDY OF GLOBAL ANTISEMITISM AND POLICY ↗
  • Who funds Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance ↗
  • Who funds AMERICANS FOR BEN-GURION UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc ↗
  • Who funds RAW ART WORKS INC ↗
  • Who funds Forget Me Not Childrens Services ↗
  • Who funds SIEGEL RARE NEUROIMMUNE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds INNOVATIONS FOR POVERTY ACTION A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD ALLERGY RESEARCH & EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Brothers for Life ↗
  • Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC ↗
  • Who funds OCEAN CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds KEKAHU FOUNDATION INC DBA KKCR ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds HILLEL FOUNDATION OF CAMBRIDGE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY16.4× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Herbert O Wolfe Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Herbert O Wolfe Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • The Second Step Inc: 26% of income from government
  • Raw Art Works Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Arts for the Aging Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Jewish Family & Children's Service Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Massachusetts Audubon Society Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Herbert O Wolfe Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Herbert O Wolfe Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 77 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2026) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2025, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Herbert O Wolfe’s filings →

More from the funding graph