· Public charity
Helios Education Foundation
To enrich the lives of individuals in arizona and florida by creating opportunities for success in post-secondary education.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k8 grants · $63k
- $10k–50k34 grants · $747k
- $50k–250k17 grants · $1.8M
- $250k+19 grants · $17M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Maricopa Community Colleges Foundation | $3,709,120 |
| University of South Florida Foundation | $1,391,693 |
| Arizona Board of Regents | $1,100,000 |
| Broward Education Foundation | $1,100,000 |
| Candelen | $1,000,000 |
| Consortium of Florida Education Foundations | $980,000 |
| Arizona Community Fdn | $968,000 |
| FACCT Initiatives | $930,000 |
| Southwest Human Development | $900,000 |
| Breakthrough Miami | $865,000 |
| Heart of Florida United Way | $750,000 |
| Camp Catanese Foundation | $500,000 |
| Achieve Miami | $500,000 |
| The Able Trust | $500,000 |
| WestEd | $445,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $2.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 44% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +59% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.
103 repeat relationships — 56 still active in FY2025, 47 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.4M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- EFEDUCATION FORWARD ARIZONA9× · 2017–2025 · $21M · revenue +23% · 77% of their budget
ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY9× · 2017–2025 · $13M · revenue +196%- VCVALENCIA COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC4× · 2017–2025 · $8.5M · revenue +147% · 96% of their budget
Funded once
- TSTHE SEED FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $1.0M · revenue +44% · 29% of their budget
- YCYavapai County Educational Services Agencyone grant, 2020 · $950k
- YUYuma Union High School District #70one grant, 2017 · $800k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…
Aacsb international provides quality assurance of business school programs, the latest in business education intelligence, thought leadership, and learning and development services.
To perform the functions of, or to carry out the purposes of the arizona community foundation, an az nonprofit corporation, so long as the arizona community foundation, inc. remains a qualified organization.
Provide post-secondary education of excellence.
We facilitate effective, bipartisan partnerships needed to achieve educational excellence and scale success across arizona's public schools - both district and charter.
Science foundation arizona's mission is to diversify arizona's economy by investing in scientific and engineering research linked to industry needs and investing in education to create a work force with 21st centrury skills.
Empowering college admission counseling professionals through education, advocacy, and community.
The arizona cpa foundation for education and innovationin coordination with the arizona society of cpas supports programs and initiatives in education and practice which enhance excellence and innovation in the profession of accountancy.
To strengthen the larger community by developing and implementing programs and services that lead to institutional enhancement and greater educational advancement.
To assist member firms in achieving higher professional, ethical business and economic standards, enabling member firms to provide quality consulting and engineering services for their clients and the public.
The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…
We provide exemplary interdisciplinary programs for a community of scholar-practitioners within a distributed learning model grounded in student-driven inquiry and leading to enhanced knowledge.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation of Tampa Bay Inc and the most unlike its peers is Yavapai County Education Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
191 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 191 of the 213 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds EDUCATION FORWARD ARIZONA ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Teach for America Inc ↗
- Who funds VALENCIA COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MARICOPA COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds University of South Florida Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF TAMPA BAY INC ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA COLLEGE SYSTEM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S SERVICES COUNCIL OF FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ACHIEVE MIAMI INC ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA SCIENCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds TSIC INC DBA/TAKE STOCK IN CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds PINELLAS COUNTY EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA LATINO LEADERS IN EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds University of Arizona Foundation ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWEST HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds READ BETTER BE BETTER ↗
- Who funds Candelen Inc ↗
- Who funds Aliento Education Fund ↗
- Who funds Make Way For Books ↗
- Who funds THE CONSORTIUM OF FLORIDA EDUCATION FOUNDATIONS INC ↗
- Who funds Hillsborough Education Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds VALLEY OF THE SUN UNITED WAY ↗
- Who funds ST PETERSBURG COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MIAMI DADE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR THE FUTURE OF ARIZONA ↗
- Who funds IMPACT FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL OPINION RESEARCH CENTER ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA PHILANTHROPIC NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds EARLY CHILDHOOD INITIATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds BROWARD COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE TRANSLATIONAL GENOMICS RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Virginia G Piper Charitable Trust · Arizona Community Foundation · Burton Family Foundation · Thunderbirds Charities · The Foundation for Community and Health Advancement · Ellis Center for Educational Excellence · Suncoast Credit Union Foundation · Gates Foundation · Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida Foundation · The Diane and Bruce Halle Foundation · Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust · Valley of the Sun United Way
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Helios Education Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Urban League of Broward County Inc — 44% of income from government
- United Way Miami Inc — 23% of income from government
- Helping Advance and Nurture the Development of Youth Inc (Handy Inc) — 21% of income from government
- Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
- Big Brothers Big Sisters of Tampa Bay Inc — 3% of income from government
- Feeding America Tampa Bay Inc — 2% of income from government
- United Way Suncoast Inc — 1% of income from government
- Florida Education Foundation Inc — 1% of income from government
- Heart of Florida United Way Inc — 0% of income from government
- The Center for Effective Philanthropy Inc — 0% of income from government
- Tsic Inc Dba/Take Stock in Children — 0% of income from government
- The University of Tampa Incorporated — 0% of income from government
- Junior Achievement of Tampa Bay Inc — 0% of income from government
- Educate Tomorrow Corp — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.