· Private foundation
HEIMBINDER FAMILY FOUNDATION co WILLIAM E REICHARD
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 56% of HEIMBINDER FAMILY FOUNDATION co WILLIAM E REICHARD’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k84 grants · $107k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $148k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE BAY SCHOOL | $97,800 |
| MARY IMMACULATE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHUR | $50,000 |
| WORLDWIDE FERRY SAFETY ASSOCIATION | $15,000 |
| AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FDN | $7,000 |
| BAYKEEPER | $7,000 |
| OAK GROVE SCHOOL | $5,000 |
| CENTER FOR GENETIC AND SOCIETY | $5,000 |
| THE DOOR | $5,000 |
| OYES | $5,000 |
| BRAVE TRAILS | $4,900 |
| PROSPECT PARK ALLIANCE | $4,000 |
| FORT GREENE PARK CONSERVANCY | $3,000 |
| HABITATMAP | $3,000 |
| MARY MCDOWELL FRIENDS SCHOOL | $3,000 |
| OAK GROVE SCHOOL | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $34k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.
189 repeat relationships — 74 still active in FY2024, 115 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HIHABITATMAP INCORPORATED5× · 2020–2024 · $357k · revenue +479% · 56% of their budget
- TBTHE BAY SCHOOL2× · 2023–2024 · $110k · revenue +16%
- HGHouston Grand Opera Association Inc4× · 2020–2023 · $53k · revenue +42%
Funded once
- SAST ANNE CATHOLIC CHURCHone grant, 2020 · $300k
- EEEMANCIPATION ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCILone grant, 2020 · $30k · revenue -35%
- CCCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF HOUSTONone grant, 2023 · $20k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The architectural league of new york supports critically transformative work in the allied fields that shape the built environment. as a vital, independent forum, the league stimulates thinking, debate, and action on today's (continued on…
The new york botanical garden is a museum of plants and a scientific research center devoted to the study of plants and their uses. it is the garden's mission to improve public understanding of the natural world, horticulture, and the…
The museum of the city of new york fosters understanding of the distinctive nature of urban life in the world's most influential metropolis. it engages visitors by celebrating, documenting, and interpreting the city's past, present, and…
Apex Art Curatorial Program is a resolutely noncommercial visual art exhibition space which provides curators and artists with a venue dedicated to ideas that are often too provocative or too small in scope for display elsewhere. Apex Art…
The Museum of Modern Art is a private, non-profit institution chartered by the State of New York Department of Education in 1929 to foster public awareness of modern and contemporary art. (Continued in Schedule O)
The municipal art society of new york (mas) lifts up the voices of the people in the debates that shape new york's built environment and leads the way to a more livable city from sidewalk to skyline. mas envisions a future in which all new…
El museo's mission is to preserve, interpret, and promote the artistic heritage of puerto ricans and all latin americans in the united states by means of exhibitions, public programs, publications, and educational activities.
To inspire, educate and cultivate curiosity through great works of art.
A center for exhibitions, information, and documentation about living artists since 1977, which continues to be a place of experimentation and a hub of new art and new ideas.
The society is an international nonprofit, nonpartisan organization which connects people and institutions in asia and the world to build understanding, address challenges and maximize opportunities.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Henry Street Settlement and the most unlike its peers is Sonora High School Ptsa. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
160 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 160 of the 268 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HABITATMAP INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds THE BAY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds Houston Grand Opera Association Inc ↗
- Who funds CASA JUAN DIEGO ↗
- Who funds Worldwide Ferry Safety Association ↗
- Who funds EMANCIPATION ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds HOLOCAUST MUSEUM HOUSTON ↗
- Who funds THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESAN COUNCIL OF AUSTIN ↗
- Who funds MARGARETS VILLAGE ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ART LEAGUE OF HOUSTON ↗
- Who funds DIVERSEWORKS INC ↗
- Who funds OAK GROVE SCHOOL LLC ↗
- Who funds SONORA HIGH SCHOOL PTSA ↗
- Who funds Hermann Park Conservancy ↗
- Who funds SANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INC ↗
- Who funds Baykeeper ↗
- Who funds EMMA'S TORCH LTD ↗
- Who funds New Hope Housing Inc ↗
- Who funds BIG DANCE THEATER INC ↗
- Who funds OCCIDENTAL COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds San Bruno Mountain Watch ↗
- Who funds Saint Martin de Porres High School ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Houston Endowment Inc · The Brown Foundation Inc · The Ford Foundation · Lily Auchincloss Foundation Inc · Houston Arts Alliance · New York Women's Foundation Inc · Brooklyn Community Foundation · The Elkins Foundation · The Scherman Foundation Inc · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · The Powell Foundation · Robin Hood Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization HEIMBINDER FAMILY FOUNDATION co WILLIAM E REICHARD funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to HEIMBINDER FAMILY FOUNDATION co WILLIAM E REICHARD?
Find your warmest path to HEIMBINDER FAMILY FOUNDATION co WILLIAM E REICHARD through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.