Skip to content
Heart to Heart International Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Heart to Heart International Inc

Heart to heart international seeks to improve healthcare access in the u.s.

$296M
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$44k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

International$1.2MHealth$628kPublic Safety & Disaster$364kEducation$25k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $88,915, the rows itemized in this filing. The $295,503,888 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $295,414,973 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $74k
$30,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$71M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY INITIATIVES INC - LA CLINICA$44,139
TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF CHARITABLE CLINICS$30,000
CARE BEYOND THE BOULEVARD INC$9,853
FRIENDS IN NEED HEALTH CENTER INC$4,923
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $51k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%COMMUNITY INITIATIVES INC - LA CLINICA: $44k → 18%COMMUNITY INTIATIVES: $7k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

CA
MO
KS
TN
SC
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region: $283M on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 7 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Russia and Neighboring States$148M · 52% · 3 grants

Stated purpose: MEDICAL ASSISTANCE

Central America and the Caribbean$113M · 40% · 12 grants

Stated purpose: MEDICAL ASSISTANCE

Sub-Saharan Africa$9.9M · 3% · 11 grants

Stated purpose: MEDICAL ASSISTANCE

South Asia$9.2M · 3% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: MEDICAL ASSISTANCE

East Asia and the Pacific$2.2M · 1% · 8 grants

Stated purpose: MEDICAL ASSISTANCE

Middle East and North Africa$652k · 0% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: MEDICAL ASSISTANCE

South America$38k · 0% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: MEDICAL ASSISTANCE

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

39%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$877k · 5 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +52% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
8

Total granted

$877k
$1.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
0%

Still filing today

100%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’24’25
HealthInternationalEducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WM
    WATER MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL
    4× · 2018–2022 · $246k · revenue +36%
  • CE
    Casa El Buen Samaritano
    2× · 2017–2018 · $128k · revenue +171%
  • CI
    COMMUNITY INITIATIVES INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $51k · revenue +52%

Funded once

  • HT
    HEART TO HEART INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $1.0M · revenue -93% · 100% of their budget
  • HT
    HEART TO HEART INTERNATIONAL INCgraduated
    6× · 2017–2023 · $200k · revenue +151%
  • TL
    TRINIDAD LIFE COMMUNITY
    3× · 2019–2021 · $57k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Shared Christian Ministries

Our mission is to provide quality comprehensive free or low cost medical care for the uninsured, whatever their race or religion. The Clinic's services are available to any uninsured adult, 18 years old or older.

Health
2
Open Cities Health Center Inc

Open Cities Health Center is a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) whose mission is to provide culturally competent primary and preventive healthcare services to a largely underserved population in the Twin Cities metropolitan area.

Health
3
Jonesboro Church Health Center Inc

Our purpose is to address health disparities reduce barriers to care by offering essential medical services to those most in need. Our vision is that every person in our community has access to healthcare regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
4
Grace Health Inc

To provide patient-centered healthcare with excellence in quality, service and access.

Health
5
Health Ministries Clinic Inc

To promote and improve the quality of life by providing integrated healthcare services to the entire community in the name and spirit of Christ

Religion
6
Christian Community Health Center

To provide high quality primary health care and related services to the community regardless of the ability to pay, in a manner which demonstrates in work and deed the love of Jesus Christ.

Philanthropy
7
Hope Clinic and Care Center Inc

To provide health care services in a holistic manner to patients who meet the clinic's eligibility requirements, currently income less than 300% of the federal poverty level.

Human Services
8
Fredericksburg Community Health Center

The mission of the Good Samaritan Center is to provide a safe, Christ- Centered environment that gives our patients quality, coordinated and affordable healthcare.

Health
9
Community Health Center of Northeast Oklahoma

We recognize the diversity of the communities we serve and we are guided by our vision and commitment towards providing excellent primary care to our patients and their families. see schedule o for more information.

Health
10
Crossover Health Services Inc

Crossover health services (chs) envisions a christian healthcare movement where faith, strong relationships, and shared resources drive community restoration and eliminate health disparities. we believe that healthcare is a right, not a…

Health
11
Macon Volunteer Clinic Inc

Macon Volunteer Clinic (MVC)provides free primary medical and dental care, as well as medication assistance, to uninsured, working adult residents of Middle Georgia. All patients live at or below 200% of federal poverty level.

Health
12
Community Health Centers Inc

The mission of community health centers is to provide quality and compassionate primary healthcare services to central florida's diverse communities.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Health and Hope Clinic Inc; the most unlike its peers is Garden of Eden Health Resort Corp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

300 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
55
Early backer (in before they grew)
294/300
Grantees still filing
195/300
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HEART TO HEART INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $1,000,000 · OtherHEART TO HEART INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATIONTRINIDAD LIFE COMMUNITY: $56,950 · Other+2 more: $12,144 · OtherCORPORACION DE SERVICIOS DE SALUD Y DESARROLLO SOCIOECONOMICO EL OTOAO: $439,046 · HealthCORPORACION DE SERVICIOS DE SAL…Casa El Buen Samaritano: $128,307 · HealthCasa El Buen SamaritanoLone Star Assoc Charitable Clinics: $30,000 · Health+3 more: $27,758 · HealthWATER MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL: $246,350 · InternationalWATER MISSIONS INTERNAT…HEART TO HEART INTERNATIONAL INC: $200,000 · InternationalHEART TO HEART INTERNAT…+1 more: $10,000 · InternationalCOMMUNITY INITIATIVES INC: $51,490 · Human ServicesPONCE MEDICAL SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · Education
Other$1,069,094Health$625,111International$456,350Human Services$51,490Education$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHEART TO HEART INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $1,000,000 over 1y, 100% of budgetCORPORACION DE SERVICIOS DE SALUD Y DESARROLLO SOCIOECONOMICO EL OTOAO: $439,046 over 3y, 43% of budgetWATER MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL: $246,350 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetHEART TO HEART INTERNATIONAL INC: $200,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCasa El Buen Samaritano: $128,307 over 2y, 21% of budgetCOMMUNITY INITIATIVES INC: $51,490 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetPONCE MEDICAL SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCARE BEYOND THE BOULEVARD INC: $11,619 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetOCEANA COMMUNITY HEALTH INC: $11,216 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Americares Foundation…National Association …Direct ReliefHealth Forward Founda…American Academy of F…United Way of Greater…Sostento IncDelta Dental of Misso…Oppenstein Brothers F…The Sunderland Founda…Menorah Heritage Foun…MAP International Inc
Americares Foundation IncCT138.4× affinity123 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Americares Foundation Inc · National Association of Free and Charitable Clinics Inc · Direct Relief · Health Forward Foundation · American Academy of Family Physicians Fdn · United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc · Sostento Inc · Delta Dental of Missouri · Oppenstein Brothers Foundation · The Sunderland Foundation · Menorah Heritage Foundation · MAP International Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Heart to Heart International Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Heart to Heart International Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Oceana Community Health Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Heart to Heart International’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home