Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Public charity

Delta Dental of Missouri

The organization's primary purpose is to improve the dental health of the public by promoting preventive dentistry and providing comprehensive dental care and maintenance on a prepaid basis.

$1.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
42
Grants FY2024still arriving
—
States reached
$70k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$7.8MHuman Services$844kPhilanthropy$624kEducation$489kPublic Benefit$292kArts & Culture$166kCommunity Improvement$160kEnvironment$135kOther$0
02FY2024 · 42 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 42 grants below total $1,157,867 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,253,514 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $95,647 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k31 grants · $757k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $375k
$25,000
Median grant
—
States reached
$229M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Ozarks Community Health Center$70,000
Prisma Health Midlands Foundation$55,000
Kansas City University$50,000
Rural Parish Clinic of the Archdiocese of St Louis$50,000
Care Beyond the Boulevard$50,000
Regional Healthcare Clinic Inc$50,000
Medical University of South Carolina$50,000
Swope Health Services$45,000
Edward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine$42,099
HNC Living Foundation$40,000
Healthy Smiles of Spartanburg$40,000
Delta Dental Plans Association$32,295
Missouri Coalition for Oral Health$30,000
Give Kids a Smile$30,000
St Louis Children's Hospital Foundation$26,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–23, $392k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Mission Dental South Carolina Inc: $25k → 15%Senior Resources Inc: $25k → 16%Youth In Need: $25k → 5%Ozark Action Inc: $20k → 19%Epworth Children's Home: $10k → 16%EAST COOPER COMMUNITY OUTREACH: $50k → 12%Healthy Learners: $50k → 16%East Cooper Community Outreach: $40k → 12%Healthy Learners: $50k → 16%Healthy Learners: $25k → 16%Neighbors Together: $25k → 12%Hope House Inc: $17k → 15%Hope House Inc: $15k → 15%Hope House Inc: $15k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
WI
CO
MO
MD
KS
SC
AL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$8.0M · 56 repeat orgs$2.2M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.

56 repeat relationships — 26 still active in FY2024, 30 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

56
56

Total granted

$8.0M
$1.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+19%

Still filing today

93%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $458k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureFood & NutritionPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HS
    HEALTHY SMILES OF SPARTANBURG INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $289k · revenue +31%
  • SL
    ST LOUIS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    5× · 2017–2024 · $252k · revenue +100%
  • GT
    GATEWAY TO ORAL HEALTH FOUNDATION
    2× · 2017–2021 · $233k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • RM
    RICHLAND MEDICAL CENTER D/B/A CENTRAL OZARKS MEDICAL CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +6%
  • MC
    MISSOURI COALITION FOR PRIMARY HEALTH CAREgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +38%
  • CT
    COMMUNITY TREATMENT INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $100k · revenue +28%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Health Center of Central Missouri

To provide improved access to primary care, behavioral healthcare and oral health care services for medically underserved individuals in central missouri regardless of their ability to pay. our vision is embracing people and inspiring…

Human Services
2
Healthcore Clinic Inc

The mission of healthcore clinic, inc is to provide quality family healthcare through improved access and a heightened and unrelenting focus on education and prevention.

Health
3
Charles River Community Health Inc

To partner with individuals and families so they can thrive and lead healthier lives by delivering the comprehensive, integrated, and equitable primary healthcare that matters most to them.

Health
4
Community Health Center of Se Kansas Inc

To provide quality, affordable, accessible medical, dental and behavioral health care to anyone regardless of ability to pay.

Health
5
Community Health Centers of Southeastern Iowa Inc

To provide primary health care to residents of the greater se iowa region, especially those individuals/families with limited resources or with other barriers to health care. see schedule o for additional information.

Health
6
Heartland Medical Clinic Inc

Heartland offers high-quality, affordable, behavior ally-enhanced primary care to all community members regardless of income or insurance status. heartland is dedicated to practicing holistic, integrated health care in a model that focuses…

Health
7
Community Health Care Inc

Community health care provides the communities we serve with excellence in patient-centered medical, dental, and behavioral health care that is compassionate, affordable, and accessible.

—
8
Heartland Community Health Clinic D/B/a Heartland Health Services

Provide affordable, high-quality health services and remove inequities to improve the lives of all.

Health
9
Northeast Missouri Health Council Inc

The ne mo health council, inc. was established to meet the primary healthcare needs of the residents of ne mo through a not-for-profit community-responsible approach. see schedule o for details.

—
10
Community Health Center of Central Wyoming Inc

To maintain a high quality patient care delivery system that provides access to comprehensive health care services, regardless of ability to pay. it is the desire of chccw to treat all patients with the dignity and respect they deserve…

Health
11
Advance Community Health Inc

To deliver quality, compassionate primary health care. every patient. every time. in response to the needs of our communities.

Health
12
Community Dental Care

Our mission is to provide culturally sensitive community oral health care, preventive education, professional training, and to advocate for access for all. our vision is that all people will have access to high quality, affordable dental…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Advocates for a Healthy Community Inc and the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsCancer Support ServicesSenior Support ServicesAffordable Housing Developm…United Way AffiliatesElementary Literacy TutoringSchool District FoundationsYouth Development ServicesCommunity College Foundatio…Food Banks and PantriesPublic Library OperationsHealth Access Advocacy and …Community Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 24. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%2%<5yr12%5%5–10yr16%7%10–20yr15%26%20–35yr16%31%35–55yr24%28%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%3%<5yr12%2%5–10yr16%9%10–20yr15%32%20–35yr16%32%35–55yr24%22%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%3/133
the rest of the field
12%
4,543/39,358

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

103 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 103 of the 133 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
20
Early backer (in before they grew)
100/103
Grantees still filing
73/103
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION & WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT — $708,465 · OtherMISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION & WORKF…GIVE KIDS A SMILE INC — $443,000 · OtherGIVE KIDS A SMILE INCPHI CHI MEDICAL FRATERNITY INC — $350,000 · OtherPHI CHI MEDICAL FRATERNITY INCMISSOURI DENTAL ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION — $350,000 · OtherMISSOURI DENTAL ASSOCIATION FOUNDATIONOUR LADY OF MERCY COMMUNITY OUTREACH SERVICES — $185,000 · OtherDELTA AREA ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY CORPORATION — $150,000 · Other+57 more — $2,263,278 · Other+57 moreHEALTHY SMILES OF SPARTANBURG INC — $288,800 · HealthHEALTHY SMILES OF SPARTANBURG INCST LOUIS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $251,500 · HealthST LOUIS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONGATEWAY TO ORAL HEALTH FOUNDATION — $232,617 · HealthGATEWAY TO ORAL HEALTH FOUNDATIONPRISMA HEALTH MIDLANDS FOUNDATION F/K/A PALMETTO HEALTH FOUNDATION — $211,396 · HealthPRISMA HEALTH MIDLANDS FOUNDATION F/K/A …MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA FOUNDATION — $199,633 · HealthHNC LIVING FOUNDATION — $185,000 · HealthNorth Charleston Dental Outreach Inc — $175,000 · HealthRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF THE OZARKS INC — $154,250 · HealthBLUFFTON-JASPER COUNTY VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE INC — $150,000 · HealthSWOPE HEALTH SERVICES — $149,483 · HealthDENTAL LIFELINE NETWORK — $149,000 · HealthCASS COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION — $148,972 · HealthTRUMAN MEDICAL CENTER CHARITABLE FOUNDATION — $148,099 · Health+29 more — $1,345,573 · Health+29 moreTHE DENTAL HEALTH THEATRE INC — $725,000 · EducationTHE DENTAL H…GREENVILLE TECH FOUNDATION INC — $117,100 · EducationGREENVILLE T…ST LOUIS UNIVERSITY — $90,596 · EducationST LOUIS UNI…MIDLANDS TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $61,400 · EducationST LOUIS COUNTY LIBRARY FOUNDATION — $50,648 · EducationKansas City University — $50,000 · EducationEDWARD VIA VIRGINIA COLLEGE OF OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE — $42,099 · Education+3 more — $80,000 · Education+3 moreCENTRAL CAROLINA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $200,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE OZARKS INC — $140,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF THE MIDLANDS — $104,100 · PhilanthropyST LOUIS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 · PhilanthropyGreater Kansas City Community Foundation — $40,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL MO — $40,000 · PhilanthropyHEALTHY LEARNERS — $150,000 · Human ServicesEast Cooper Community Outreach — $90,000 · Human ServicesHOPE HOUSE INC — $62,410 · Human ServicesMISSION DENTAL SOUTH CAROLINA INC — $49,450 · Human ServicesNeighbors Together Inc — $25,000 · Human ServicesYOUTH IN NEED — $25,000 · Human ServicesSenior Resources Inc — $25,000 · Human ServicesOZARK ACTION INC — $19,635 · Human Services+1 more — $10,000 · Human ServicesST LOUIS REGIONAL PUBLIC MEDIA INC — $70,000 · Arts & CultureEdventure Inc — $20,500 · Arts & CultureBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC — $35,000 · Youth Development
Other$4,449,743Health$3,789,323Education$1,216,843Philanthropy$624,100Human Services$456,495Arts & Culture$90,500Youth Development$35,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE DENTAL HEALTH THEATRE INC — $725,000 over 5y, 51% of budgetGIVE KIDS A SMILE INC — $443,000 over 7y, 47% of budgetMISSOURI DENTAL ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION — $350,000 over 3y, 50% of budgetHEALTHY SMILES OF SPARTANBURG INC — $288,800 over 7y, 9.8% of budgetST LOUIS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $251,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetGATEWAY TO ORAL HEALTH FOUNDATION — $232,617 over 2y, 13% of budgetPRISMA HEALTH MIDLANDS FOUNDATION F/K/A PALMETTO HEALTH FOUNDATION — $211,396 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetCENTRAL CAROLINA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $200,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA FOUNDATION — $199,633 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOUR LADY OF MERCY COMMUNITY OUTREACH SERVICES — $185,000 over 5y, 2.6% of budgetHNC LIVING FOUNDATION — $185,000 over 5y, 9.0% of budgetNorth Charleston Dental Outreach Inc — $175,000 over 3y, 27% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF THE OZARKS INC — $154,250 over 8y, 2.4% of budgetBLUFFTON-JASPER COUNTY VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE INC — $150,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetHEALTHY LEARNERS — $150,000 over 4y, 3.2% of budgetDELTA AREA ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY CORPORATION — $150,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSWOPE HEALTH SERVICES — $149,483 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetDENTAL LIFELINE NETWORK — $149,000 over 6y, 2.6% of budgetCASS COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION — $148,972 over 6y, 3.3% of budgetTRUMAN MEDICAL CENTER CHARITABLE FOUNDATION — $148,099 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE OZARKS INC — $140,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetRURAL PARISH CLINIC — $135,000 over 4y, 6.0% of budgetHEARTLAND OUTREACH PROVIDERS — $124,812 over 3y, 16% of budgetBIG SPRINGS MEDICAL ASSOCIATION INC — $119,086 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCARESTL HEALTH — $118,614 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetGREENVILLE TECH FOUNDATION INC — $117,100 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetAdvocates For a Healthy Community Inc — $107,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE MIDLANDS — $104,100 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetRICHLAND MEDICAL CENTER D/B/A CENTRAL OZARKS MEDICAL CENTER — $100,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetVIVENT HEALTH INC — $100,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetST LOUIS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHELPING HANDS OF GEORGETOWN INC — $100,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetMISSOURI COALITION FOR PRIMARY HEALTH CARE — $99,999 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY TREATMENT INC — $99,724 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetST LOUIS UNIVERSITY — $90,596 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEast Cooper Community Outreach — $90,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetCHILDRENS SMILE CENTER CSC — $85,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetWe Care Dental Foundation — $75,000 over 3y, 27% of budgetLEVELUP KIDS INC — $70,000 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetUPWARD SMILES INC — $70,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetOzarks Resource Group — $70,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN ST LOUIS — $69,443 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetMERCY MEDICAL FREE CLINICS — $67,857 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetCatholic Charities of South Carolina — $65,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetLITTLE RIVER MEDICAL CENTER INC — $63,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHOPE HOUSE INC — $62,410 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetMIDLANDS TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $61,400 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetGREENVILLE FREE MEDICAL CLINIC INC — $60,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Heart to Heart Intern…Health Forward Founda…Sisters of Charity Fo…Commerce Bancshares F…The Leon Levine Found…Central Carolina Comm…Centene FoundationUnited Way of Greater…BlueCross BlueShield …Community Foundation …Youthbridge Community…Employees Community F…
Heart to Heart International IncKS40.2× affinity18 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Heart to Heart International Inc · Health Forward Foundation · Sisters of Charity Foundation of South Carolina · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · The Leon Levine Foundation · Central Carolina Community Foundation · Centene Foundation · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · BlueCross BlueShield of South Carolina Foundation · Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc · Youthbridge Community Foundation · Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Delta Dental of Missouri funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    22report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 133 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines