· Private foundation
Hanna Family Perpetual Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SOUTH UMPQUA HIGH SCHOOL | $5,000 |
| BUSHNELL UNIVERSITY | $4,960 |
| DCL FOUNDATION | $4,000 |
| RIDDLE ACTIVITY CENTER | $3,450 |
| COMMUNITY CANCER CENTER | $3,360 |
| ROSEBURG HIGH SCHOOL | $3,000 |
| DOERNBECHER FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB | $2,160 |
| BIDWELL FOUNDATION | $2,000 |
| SAFE HAVEN MATERNITY HOME | $1,500 |
| FAMILY DEVELOPMENT CENTER | $1,250 |
| CASA OF DOUGLAS COUNTY | $1,250 |
| SUTHERLIN HIGH SCHOOL | $1,080 |
| YONCALLA HIGH SCHOOL | $1,080 |
| DAYS CREEK CHARTER SCHOOL | $1,080 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +52% since the first grant, against +35% for those funded once.
73 repeat relationships: 33 still active in FY2025, 40 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- BUBUSHNELL UNIVERSITY FKA NORTHWEST CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY5× · 2021–2025 · $11k · revenue +12%
- UCUMPQUA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION5× · 2018–2022 · $10k · revenue +141%
- CCCOMMUNITY CANCER FOUNDATION9× · 2017–2025 · $10k · revenue +31%
Funded once
- NLNW LINEMAN COLLEGEone grant, 2023 · $5k
- RBROSEBURG BOYS & GIRLS CLUBone grant, 2024 · $2k
- SHSCIO HIGH SCHOOLone grant, 2024 · $1k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The aclu foundation of oregon is dedicated to preserving and defending civil liberties and civil rights.
We believe that the freedoms of press, speech, assembly, and religion, and the rights to due process, equal protection and privacy, are fundamental to a free people. We advance civil liberties and civil rights by activities that include…
Our mission is to empower, strengthen and sustain those impacted by cancer in our community through education, support and financial assistance.
The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…
The mission of The Oregon Community Foundation is to improve lives of all Oregonians through the power of philanthropy.
The dfo is dedicated to advancing oral health education, providing charitable care, and coordinating resources for oregon's children and vulnerable communities.
Oregon journalism project's mission is to inform, engage, and empower oregonians with the kind of data-driven and solution-seeking investigative reporting that makes a significant impact at the state and local levels - serving no agenda…
The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…
Connecting people across oregon and the pacific northwest through the power of a shared story.
Partnering with parents to provide a rich, innovative, and effective home- based education that nurtures academic success and personal growth.
As directed by oregon voters in 1984, the oregon citizens' utility board (cub) represents the interests of oregon's residential utility customers before administrative, judicial, and legislative bodies. cub works at the intersection of…
Moral compass federation facilitates collaboration among multiple veteran-led nonprofit organizations, individuals, and businesses who came together during the fall of kabul, afghanistan to evacuate and resettle afghan allies who were in…
How this is measured
36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 102 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BUSHNELL UNIVERSITY FKA NORTHWEST CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds UMPQUA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds A SMILE FOR KIDS ↗
- Who funds SAFE HAVEN MATERNITY HOME ↗
- Who funds ROSEBURG RESCUE MISSION LIGHTHOUSE OF GOD MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds CASA OF DOUGLAS COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY DEVELOPMENT CENTER ↗
- Who funds JOSH BIDWELL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE FRIENDLY KITCHEN ↗
- Who funds UMPQUA VALLEY CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds GOOD NEWS INC ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Ford Family Foundation · The Oregon Community Foundation · The Autzen Foundation · John & Jean Loosley Charitable Foundation · Hunt C Giles Char - Main · The Roundhouse Foundation · Noble B Goettel Charitable Trust · Briggs Loosley Foundation · The Bluestone Foundation · Juan Young Trust · Greater Douglas United Way · Umpqua Bank Charitable Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Hanna Family Perpetual Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hanna Family Perpetual Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
- Family Development Center: 71% of income from government
- Willamette Riverkeeper: 42% of income from government
- Oregon Food Bank: 21% of income from government
- A Smile for Kids: 19% of income from government
- Bushnell University Fka Northwest Christian University: 3% of income from government
- Casa of Douglas County Inc: 1% of income from government
- Southern Oregon Public Television Inc: 1% of income from government
- Food for the Poor Inc: 0% of income from government
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Hanna Family Perpetual Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Hanna Family Perpetual Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Hanna Family Perpetual’s filings →