· Private foundation
John & Jean Loosley Charitable Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 95% of JOHN & JEAN LOOSLEY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k4 grants · $16k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $125k
- $250k+1 grant · $1.0M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000,000 |
| UNITED WAYUMPQUA VALLEY TENNIS CENTER INC | $125,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| CAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST | $10,000 |
| THE FRIENDLY KITCHEN | $7,500 |
| UMPQUA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,500 |
| YMCA | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $33k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
26 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $125k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UCUMPQUA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION6× · 2017–2025 · $2.8M · revenue +141%
- CTCOMMISSION TO EVERY NATION5× · 2017–2023 · $49k · revenue +27%
- TFTHE FRIENDLY KITCHEN6× · 2017–2025 · $41k · revenue +113%
Funded once
- UCUMPQUA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +63%
- RRROSEBURG ROTARY FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +209%
- DCDOUGLAS COUNTY LIBRARY FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $500 · revenue +54%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Douglas cares strives to eradicate child abuse and neglect in douglas county through effective, compassionate reponse and prevention, thereby protecting children and uplifting families. our vision: douglas county is a community full of…
Partnering with parents to provide a rich, innovative, and effective home- based education that nurtures academic success and personal growth.
To develop the character, essential skills, and special gifts of each student for a fruitful life of godly impact on the world. to be a community of christian scholarship and discipleship that nurtures our students' growth in faith,…
To facilitate investigation and prosecution of child abuse perpetrators; provide services to victimized children and families; and educate the community.
Work to improve the economic well-being of agriculture and enrich the quality of farm family
Minnesota family council (mfc) is a non-profit christian organization that is dedicated to strengthening minnesota families by advancing biblical principles in the public arena, for the glory of the lord jesus christ and the good of…
The organization provides students with a rigorous education and the foundations of virtue and character, while building cultural literacy through a content-rich curriculum in an encouraging environment.
The mission is to exalt the name of jesus christ by partnering with christian families and local bible believing churches in providing a christ-centered, academically-challenged, and college-preparatory education. it is also the aim to…
To create educational and economic development programs to strengthen the roxbury community.
See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…
Rockbridge seminary is an accredited degree-granting institution of higher learning that exists to develop servant leaders for christian ministry through quality distance educational experiences that allow them to study and practice…
The mission of Roseville Community Charter School is to prepare every student for academic excellence in high school, college, and beyond. We firmly believe that college readiness begins as early as Kindergarten. By focusing on character…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Umpqua Community Health Center and the most unlike its peers is Hillsdale College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UMPQUA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UMPQUA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds COMMISSION TO EVERY NATION ↗
- Who funds THE FRIENDLY KITCHEN ↗
- Who funds GENEVA ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds UMPQUA VALLEY YOUTH FOR CHRIST ↗
- Who funds FAMILY DEVELOPMENT CENTER ↗
- Who funds UMPQUA VALLEY CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds THE FISH OF ROSEBURG ↗
- Who funds ROSEBURG RESCUE MISSION LIGHTHOUSE OF GOD MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds PEACE AT HOME ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE UMPQUA VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds CASA OF DOUGLAS COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds Pacific Legal Foundation ↗
- Who funds MERCY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SMART READING ↗
- Who funds ROSEBURG ROTARY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DOUGLAS COUNTY LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Ford Family Foundation · Briggs Loosley Foundation · The Oregon Community Foundation · Noble B Goettel Charitable Trust · Hanna Family Perpetual Foundation · Greater Douglas United Way · Hunt C Giles Char - Main · The Autzen Foundation · The Roundhouse Foundation · US Family Foundation Inc · The Avista Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization John & Jean Loosley Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Family Development Center — 71% of income from government
- Umpqua Community Health Center — 20% of income from government
- Smart Reading — 3% of income from government
- Casa of Douglas County Inc — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to John & Jean Loosley Charitable Foundation?
Find your warmest path to John & Jean Loosley Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.