· Private foundation
Hanna Family Perpetual Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SOUTH UMPQUA HIGH SCHOOL | $5,000 |
| BUSHNELL UNIVERSITY | $4,960 |
| DCL FOUNDATION | $4,000 |
| RIDDLE ACTIVITY CENTER | $3,450 |
| COMMUNITY CANCER CENTER | $3,360 |
| ROSEBURG HIGH SCHOOL | $3,000 |
| DOERNBECHER FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB | $2,160 |
| BIDWELL FOUNDATION | $2,000 |
| SAFE HAVEN MATERNITY HOME | $1,500 |
| FAMILY DEVELOPMENT CENTER | $1,250 |
| CASA OF DOUGLAS COUNTY | $1,250 |
| GLIDE HIGH SCHOOL | $1,080 |
| YONCALLA HIGH SCHOOL | $1,080 |
| GLENDALE HIGH SCHOOL | $1,080 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +52% since the first grant, against +35% for the ones you funded once.
73 repeat relationships — 33 still active in FY2025, 40 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BUBUSHNELL UNIVERSITY FKA NORTHWEST CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY5× · 2021–2025 · $11k · revenue +12%
- UCUMPQUA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION5× · 2018–2022 · $10k · revenue +141%
- CCCOMMUNITY CANCER FOUNDATION9× · 2017–2025 · $10k · revenue +31%
Funded once
- NLNW LINEMAN COLLEGEone grant, 2023 · $5k
- RBROSEBURG BOYS & GIRLS CLUBone grant, 2024 · $2k
- SHSCIO HIGH SCHOOLone grant, 2024 · $1k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The aclu foundation of oregon is dedicated to preserving and defending civil liberties and civil rights.
We believe that the freedoms of press, speech, assembly, and religion, and the rights to due process, equal protection and privacy, are fundamental to a free people. We advance civil liberties and civil rights by activities that include…
Our mission is to empower, strengthen and sustain those impacted by cancer in our community through education, support and financial assistance.
The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…
The mission of The Oregon Community Foundation is to improve lives of all Oregonians through the power of philanthropy.
The dfo is dedicated to advancing oral health education, providing charitable care, and coordinating resources for oregon's children and vulnerable communities.
Oregon journalism project's mission is to inform, engage, and empower oregonians with the kind of data-driven and solution-seeking investigative reporting that makes a significant impact at the state and local levels - serving no agenda…
The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…
Connecting people across oregon and the pacific northwest through the power of a shared story.
Partnering with parents to provide a rich, innovative, and effective home- based education that nurtures academic success and personal growth.
As directed by oregon voters in 1984, the oregon citizens' utility board (cub) represents the interests of oregon's residential utility customers before administrative, judicial, and legislative bodies. cub works at the intersection of…
Moral compass federation facilitates collaboration among multiple veteran-led nonprofit organizations, individuals, and businesses who came together during the fall of kabul, afghanistan to evacuate and resettle afghan allies who were in…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation and the most unlike its peers is The National World War Ii Museum Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 44 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 102 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BUSHNELL UNIVERSITY FKA NORTHWEST CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds UMPQUA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds A SMILE FOR KIDS ↗
- Who funds SAFE HAVEN MATERNITY HOME ↗
- Who funds ROSEBURG RESCUE MISSION LIGHTHOUSE OF GOD MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds CASA OF DOUGLAS COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY DEVELOPMENT CENTER ↗
- Who funds JOSH BIDWELL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE FRIENDLY KITCHEN ↗
- Who funds UMPQUA VALLEY CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds GOOD NEWS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Ford Family Foundation · The Oregon Community Foundation · The Autzen Foundation · John & Jean Loosley Charitable Foundation · Hunt C Giles Char - Main · The Roundhouse Foundation · Noble B Goettel Charitable Trust · Briggs Loosley Foundation · The Bluestone Foundation · Juan Young Trust · Greater Douglas United Way · Umpqua Bank Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Hanna Family Perpetual Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Family Development Center — 71% of income from government
- Willamette Riverkeeper — 42% of income from government
- Oregon Food Bank — 21% of income from government
- A Smile for Kids — 19% of income from government
- Bushnell University Fka Northwest Christian University — 3% of income from government
- Casa of Douglas County Inc — 1% of income from government
- Southern Oregon Public Television Inc — 1% of income from government
- Food for the Poor Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Hanna Family Perpetual Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Hanna Family Perpetual Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.