· Private foundation
Hunt C Giles Char - Main
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k9 grants · $57k
- $10k–50k17 grants · $244k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LOWER UMPQUA HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| SUTHERLIN OAKLAND EMERGENCY FOOD PANTRY | $20,000 |
| THE FISH OF ROSEBURG | $20,000 |
| THE FRIENDLY KITCHEN | $20,000 |
| ST FRANCIS COMMUNITY KITCHEN | $20,000 |
| FAMILY DEVELOPMENT DOUGLAS CNTY RELIEF | $15,000 |
| SUTHERLIN LIBRARY FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| CITY OF ROSEBURG | $15,000 |
| THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND | $12,500 |
| ST JOSEPH COMMUNITY KITCHEN | $11,000 |
| LIGHTHOUSE OF GOD MISSION | $10,000 |
| THE REEDSPORT COLLECTIVE | $10,000 |
| ELKTON COMMUNITY EDUCATION CENTER | $10,000 |
| LOWER UMPQUA MINISTERIAL ASSN CHURCH GOD | $10,000 |
| SUTHERLIN SCHOOL DISTRICT | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $282k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +58% since the first grant, against +30% for the ones you funded once.
56 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2025, 40 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $112k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TFTHE FISH OF ROSEBURG8× · 2018–2025 · $149k · revenue +100%
- BGBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE UMPQUA VALLEY INC6× · 2018–2023 · $97k · revenue +40%
- TFTHE FRIENDLY KITCHEN6× · 2018–2025 · $73k · revenue +89%
Funded once
- GRGLIDE REVITALIZATIONone grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue -5%
- FDFAMILY DEVELOPMENT CENTER DOUGLAS COUNTone grant, 2024 · $15k
- SCSUTHERLIN COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTERone grant, 2018 · $12k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide South Lane County community members with basic needs resources, life skills, and resources toward self-sufficiency.
To conserve and enhance land in southern oregon to sustain our human and natural communities forever.
Oregon agricultural trust partners with farmers and ranchers to protect agricultural lands for the benefit of oregons economy, communities, and landscapes.
Assisting individuals with developmental disabilities to define, direct and pursue the life they choose through planning and coordination of services and resources.
Encourage and facilitate business and economic growth in douglas county, oregon
Increase sustainable food security in South Corvallis by providing emergency food and supplies.
To provide assistance and awareness of oregon jobs
To support public policies that will help oregon's economy and create new family supporting jobs in oregon.
Orla serves as the leading industry advocate, striving to protect, improve and promote oregon hospitality.
Saving grace offers safety, hope, and healing to survivors of intimiate partner violence and sexual assault and engages central oregon to build life free from violence.
Our mission is to grow organizing power and leaders for a more just and thriving Southern Oregon.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oregon Coast Community Action and the most unlike its peers is Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
54 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 54 of the 117 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE FISH OF ROSEBURG ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE UMPQUA VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds THE FRIENDLY KITCHEN ↗
- Who funds UNITED COMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK ↗
- Who funds Sutherlin Oakland Emergency Food Pantry ↗
- Who funds Elkton Community Education Center ↗
- Who funds SAFARI GAME SEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF FORDS POND ↗
- Who funds SAFE HAVEN MATERNITY HOME ↗
- Who funds SMART READING ↗
- Who funds ROSEBURG RESCUE MISSION LIGHTHOUSE OF GOD MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds HIV ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds CASA OF DOUGLAS COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds OREGON COAST COMMUNITY ACTION ↗
- Who funds Lower Umpqua Hospital Foundation ↗
- Who funds Source One Serenity ↗
- Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF OREGON ↗
- Who funds NORTH UMPQUA HOLIDAY FOOD & GIFT PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds FAMILY DEVELOPMENT CENTER ↗
- Who funds COBB CHILDREN'S LEARNING CENTER ↗
- Who funds Sutherlin Booster Club ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Ford Family Foundation · The Oregon Community Foundation · The Roundhouse Foundation · The Autzen Foundation · Greater Douglas United Way · Umpqua Bank Charitable Foundation · The Collins Foundation · Meyer Memorial Trust · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Dutch Bros Foundation · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · Noble B Goettel Charitable Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Hunt C Giles Char - Main funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Sunrise Enterprises of Roseburginc — 99% of income from government
- Glide Revitalization — 87% of income from government
- Oregon Coast Community Action — 85% of income from government
- United Community Action Network — 82% of income from government
- Family Development Center — 71% of income from government
- Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers Inc — 67% of income from government
- South Lane Family Nursery Inc — 58% of income from government
- Hiv Alliance — 54% of income from government
- Umpqua Watersheds — 41% of income from government
- Phoenix School of Roseburg — 41% of income from government
- Family Faith and Relationship Advocates — 40% of income from government
- Douglas County Children's Center Inc — 24% of income from government
- College Dreams Inc — 23% of income from government
- Oregon Coast School of Art — 19% of income from government
- A Smile for Kids — 19% of income from government
- Source One Serenity — 16% of income from government
- Onward Roseburg — 4% of income from government
- Smart Reading — 3% of income from government
- Elkton Community Education Center — 2% of income from government
- Casa of Douglas County Inc — 1% of income from government
- Safari Game Search Foundation — 1% of income from government
- Serenity Lane — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.