· Private foundation
The Bluestone Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k72 grants · $227k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $51k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| KLCC PUBLIC RADIO FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| WHYY INC | $11,000 |
| HORIZONS AT SPRINGSIDE CHESTNUT HILL ACADEMY | $10,000 |
| NATURE CONSERVANCY (BLOCK ISLAND CONSERVANCY) | $10,000 |
| FOOD FOR LANE COUNTY | $9,000 |
| PHILABUNDANCE | $8,000 |
| RHODE ISLAND NATURAL HISTORY SURVEY (RINHS) | $8,000 |
| FISH OF ROSEBERG (FRIENDS IN SERVICE TO HUMANITY) | $7,500 |
| APPLEGATE HOUSE HERITAGE ARTS AND EDUCATION INC | $6,000 |
| PROJECT HOME | $5,000 |
| ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED | $5,000 |
| ACLU FOUNDATION (AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION) | $5,000 |
| BLOCK ISLAND HEALTH SERVICES INC | $5,000 |
| COVENANT HOUSE | $5,000 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY PHILADELPHIA | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $144k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
103 repeat relationships — 69 still active in FY2025, 34 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
WHYY INC9× · 2017–2025 · $79k · revenue +20%- RIRHODE ISLAND NATURAL HISTORY SURVEY9× · 2017–2025 · $72k · revenue +15%
- FFFOOD FOR LANE COUNTY9× · 2017–2025 · $41k · revenue +49%
Funded once
AMERICARES FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue -22%- NWNATIONAL WOMEN'S HALL OF FAME INCone grant, 2024 · $1k · revenue 0%
- GHGLENN H CURISS MUSEUMone grant, 2024 · $1k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Founded in 1827, the pennsylvania horticultural society (phs) uses horticulture to advance the health and well-being of the greater philadelphia region. (continued in sch o)phs's work focuses on four impact priorities: creating healthy…
To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.
The western pennsylvania conservancy protects and restores exceptional places to provide our region with clean waters and healthy forests, wildlife and natural areas for the benefit of present and future generations. the conservancy…
The pinchot institute for conservation is a public benefit non-profit corporation. we are passionate about protecting nature and creating breakthroughs that result in more sustaianable ecosystems and economies. the institute is…
Glen foerd stewards an eclectic riverfront estate for the enjoyment and educational benefit of the community. drawing from the estate's architecture, art, material culture, and history-as well as its gardens and waterways-glen foerd…
Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.
We improve quality of life by enhancing and stewarding pittsburgh's parks in partnership with the community.
The new york botanical garden is a museum of plants and a scientific research center devoted to the study of plants and their uses. it is the garden's mission to improve public understanding of the natural world, horticulture, and the…
The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.
The museum is an educational corporation formed to ignite a life-long passion for exploring, discovering, and valuing nature and science.
Natural History Institute is organized to provide leadership and resources for a revitalized practice of natural history that integrates art, science, and humanities to promote the health and well-being of humans and the rest of the…
The adirondack council ensures the ecological integrity (clean water and air, wildlife habitat, etc.), wild character (solitude, scenic beauty, etc.), and vibrant communities of new york's six-million-acre adirondack park. the adirondack…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Schuylkill Center for Environmental Education and the most unlike its peers is Friends Peace Teams Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
94 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 94 of the 116 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WHYY INC ↗
- Who funds RHODE ISLAND NATURAL HISTORY SURVEY ↗
- Who funds FOOD FOR LANE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds SPRINGSIDE CHESTNUT HILL ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds CASA OF DOUGLAS COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds THE FISH OF ROSEBURG ↗
- Who funds Chestnut Hill Conservancy ↗
- Who funds UMPQUA VALLEY ARTS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds Philabundance ↗
- Who funds BLOCK ISLAND HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds PRESERVATION ALLIANCE FOR GREATER PHILADELPHIA ↗
- Who funds BLOCK ISLAND HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds DOUGLAS COUNTY CHILDREN'S CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds BLOCK ISLAND CONSERVANCY INC ↗
- Who funds CLOVIS BOTANICAL GARDEN ↗
- Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds KLCC PUBLIC RADIO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds McKenzie River Trust ↗
- Who funds FAMILY DEVELOPMENT CENTER ↗
- Who funds PROJECT HOME ↗
- Who funds BUDUDA AMERICA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds CALDERA ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY PHILADELPHIA INC ↗
- Who funds WILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds WOODMERE ART MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds Block Island Volunter Fire & Rescue Department (Inc) ↗
- Who funds The Schuylkill Center For Environmental Education ↗
- Who funds WILDAID INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY SUPPORTED SHELTERS ↗
- Who funds MARY D FUND INC ↗
- Who funds UMPQUA LOW-COST VETERINARY SERVICE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a loosely connected circle, clustered around a few shared anchors.
Open a dossier: The Ford Family Foundation · The Oregon Community Foundation · The Philadelphia Foundation · The William Penn Foundation · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · Henry Dolfinger 2 Trust Uw · The Roundhouse Foundation · Hunt C Giles Char - Main · The Autzen Foundation · Independence Foundation · The Collins Foundation · William C Young Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Bluestone Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Sunrise Enterprises of Roseburginc — 99% of income from government
- Family Development Center — 71% of income from government
- Hiv Alliance — 54% of income from government
- Umpqua Watersheds — 41% of income from government
- Douglas County Children's Center Inc — 24% of income from government
- McKenzie River Trust — 8% of income from government
- Food for Lane County — 5% of income from government
- Cradles to Crayons Inc — 2% of income from government
- Klcc Public Radio Foundation — 2% of income from government
- Umpqua Valley Arts Association — 1% of income from government
- Casa of Douglas County Inc — 1% of income from government
- Caldera — 1% of income from government
- Jasper Mountain — 0% of income from government
- Sandy Hook Promise Foundation — 0% of income from government
- Americares Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Community Supported Shelters — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.