How much did HAHL PROCTOR CHARITABLE TRUST grant in FY2025?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 58% of HAHL PROCTOR CHARITABLE TRUST’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

midland

2020

—

2021

westmidland

2022

equine therapy

2023

teenmidland

2024

midland

2025

midlandchildren

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k3 grants · $15k
$10k–50k16 grants · $270k

$15,000

Median grant

States reached

$6.3M

Total assets

Largest grants

MIDLAND CHILDREN'S REHABILITATION$30,000
HILLCREST SCHOOL INC$30,000
HOSPICE OF MIDLAND INC$25,000
MARC INC$20,000
CASA OF WEST TEXAS$20,000
HIGH SKY CHILDREN'S RANCH INC$20,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MIDLAND INC$20,000
SIBLEY ENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING$15,000
MIDLAND HISTORICAL SOCIETY$15,000
SAFE PLACE OF THE PERMIAN BASIN$15,000
SAMARITAN COUNSELING CENTER$10,000
COMMUNITY CHILDREN'S MINISTRY$10,000
MIDLAND TEEN COURT INC$10,000
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS$10,000
CENTERS FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC$10,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$1.6M · 21 repeat orgs$180k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +44% since the first grant, against -39% for the ones you funded once.

21 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$1.6M

$145k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%

-39%

Still filing today

62%

50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Arts & CultureHealthEnvironmentHuman ServicesCivil RightsYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

MC
MIDLAND CHILDREN'S REHABILITATION
6× · 2019–2025 · $200k · revenue +14%
HS
HILLCREST SCHOOL INC
7× · 2019–2025 · $165k · revenue +66%
SE
SIBLEY ENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING
6× · 2019–2025 · $120k · revenue +84%

Funded once

MT
MIDLAND TENNIS CENTER INC
one grant, 2020 · $50k
WC
WI COOK FOUNDATION INC
one grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue -39%
FE
FIELDS EDGEgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue +894%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Midland Childrens Rehabilitation

To provide rehabilitation services to every child in the permian basin with a neurologic or orthopedic need at little or no cost.

Health

Museum of East Texas

Developing and maintaining a museum devoted to the procurement, care, and display of objects of lasting historical and cultural interest. The museum offers a variety of public programs throughout the year and is committed to visual arts…

Arts & Culture

Casa of the Permian Basin Inc

CASA trains volunteers to advocate for the best interests of abused and neglected children in the court system to ensure that each child is placed in a safe, permanent, and healthy environment.

Civil Rights

Mymichigan Medical Center Midland

Creating healthy communities together by providing excellent health services to improve the quality of life for people in our communities.

Health

Mission Health Care Inc

The organization operates an adult day care facility in midland, texas which offers a multi-disciplinary, comprehensive health and activity program for frail and impaired elderly and disabled residents.

Health

Midland Community Development Corp

The organization assists qualified first time homebuyers with credit report review, counseling, and down payment assistance to be "mortgage ready" in the puchase of their first home. in partnership with the city of midland, the…

Human Services

Helping Our Riders Succeed in Education

The H.O.R.S.E Center strives to enhance individual, family and group functioning by providing opportunities to develop skills for solving problems, overcoming obstacles, and reaching individual or group goals.

Human Services

Bush Tennis Center

The mission of the Center is to give everyone the opportunity to experience the game of tennis regardless of physical, financial or geographical barriers.

—

Midlands Mediation Center

midlands Mediation Center promotes the voluntary resolution of disputes through the process of mediation conducted by volunteers. MMC also provides training to community members on conflict management including mediator training as…

Community Improvement

Permian Basin - Be the Change

To inspire and strengthen the Permian Basin community by creating and implementing experiential workshops in schools, which shall develop the capacity of students, faculty, and staff to effectively address social problems often found in…

Youth Development

Midland County Child Protection Council

To prevent child abuse and neglect and improve the quality of life for children and families.

—

Midland County Public Library Foundation

To support and enhance the operations, acquisitions, and funding of projects and programs that encourage lifelong learning through the Midland County Public Library System.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Centers for Children and Families Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Field's Edge. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

20 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

20/20

Grantees still filing

14/20

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$1,080,000Health$225,000Environment$125,000Civil Rights$115,000Human Services$85,000Youth Development$77,500Arts & Culture$77,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Permian Basin Area FoundationTX45.8× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Permian Basin Area Foundation · Scharbauer Foundation Inc · Abell-Hanger Foundation · Helen Greathouse Charitable Trust · Pevehouse Family Foundation · Beal Foundation · Fmh Foundation · The Henry Foundation · Bryant Family Foundation · The Fasken Foundation · Warren Charitable Foundation · Rea Charitable Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation HAHL PROCTOR CHARITABLE TRUST funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: MIDLAND HISTORICAL SOCIETY.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 811226056 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on MIDLAND HISTORICAL SOCIETY, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 14% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Hahl Proctor Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to Hahl Proctor Charitable Trust through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

HAHL PROCTOR CHARITABLE TRUST

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

20 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Hahl Proctor Charitable Trust?

More from the funding graph

HAHL PROCTOR CHARITABLE TRUST

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

20 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Hahl Proctor Charitable Trust?

More from the funding graph