· Private foundation
Hahl Proctor Charitable Trust
Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2026.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2026
- Under $10k1 grant · $5k
- $10k–50k16 grants · $297k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MIDLAND CHILDREN'S REHABILITATION | $30,000 |
| HILLCREST SCHOOL INC | $30,000 |
| SENIOR LIFE MIDLAND INC | $25,000 |
| CASA OF WEST TEXAS | $25,000 |
| MIDLAND RAPE CRISIS & CHILDREN'S | $20,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MIDLAND INC | $20,000 |
| SHARING HANDS A RESPITE | $20,000 |
| MARC INC | $20,000 |
| WEST TEXAS FOOD BANK | $20,000 |
| HOSPICE OF MIDLAND INC | $15,000 |
| SAFE PLACE OF THE PERMIAN BASIN | $15,000 |
| SIBLEY ENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING | $15,000 |
| CASA DE AMIGOS OF MIDLAND | $12,000 |
| COMMUNITY CHILDREN'S MINISTRY | $10,000 |
| COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.
24 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2026, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2026, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MCMIDLAND CHILDRENS REHABILITATION CENTER INC8× · 2017–2026 · $255k · revenue +40%
- HSHillcrest School Inc9× · 2017–2026 · $206k · revenue +12%
- COCASA OF WEST TEXAS7× · 2017–2026 · $185k · revenue +77%
Funded once
- BTBUSH TENNIS CENTERgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +47%
- MOMUSEUM OF THE SOUTHWESTone grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue -21%
- TFThe Fields Edgeone grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue -9%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The organization operates an adult day care facility in midland, texas which offers a multi-disciplinary, comprehensive health and activity program for frail and impaired elderly and disabled residents.
To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.
The Organizations mission is to bring unity and efficiency to investigations of child abuse through the use of a multi-disciplinary team and, thereby, to provide the best possible services to victims of child abuse and their families.
The H.O.R.S.E. Center is an established, multi-faceted equine facility committed to deepening the strength of emotional, physical, and conceptual connections utilizing diverse modalities to to elevate our clients to better themselves.
Midland community healthcare services provides affordable, comprehensive, accessible, culturally appropriate, cost-effect, primary healthcare services to residents mainly in midland county.
The Family Guidance & Outreach Center of Lubbock is dedicated to the prevention of child abuse and neglect and supporting, mentoring, and educating parents.
To provide comprehensive primary care and preventive care to all persons regardless of their ability to pay.
The organization assists qualified first time homebuyers with credit report review, counseling, and down payment assistance to be "mortgage ready" in the puchase of their first home. in partnership with the city of midland, the…
Meals on Wheels of Odessa enables people to live with dignity by offering community support and sustenance through coordinated services and enable older adults to live in their own homes safely and independently as long as they are able.
To entertain, educate and inspire a diverse and expanding regional audiences in the arts, sciences and humanities.
To prevent child abuse and neglect and improve the quality of life for children and families.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Midland Community Theatre Inc and the most unlike its peers is Hillcrest School Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MIDLAND CHILDRENS REHABILITATION CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Hillcrest School Inc ↗
- Who funds CASA OF WEST TEXAS ↗
- Who funds SIBLEY ENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING CENTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF MIDLAND INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY CHILDREN'S MINISTRY ↗
- Who funds SAFE PLACE OF THE PERMIAN BASIN ↗
- Who funds HIGH SKY CHILDRENS RANCH INC ↗
- Who funds HOSPICE OF MIDLAND INC ↗
- Who funds WEST TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds SENIOR LIFE MIDLAND INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF GREATER WICHITA FALLS AREA ↗
- Who funds BUSH TENNIS CENTER ↗
- Who funds MIDLAND HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds MARC INC ↗
- Who funds WI Cook Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds MIDLAND TEEN COURT INC ↗
- Who funds CENTERS FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC ↗
- Who funds HISPANIC CULTURAL CENTER OF MIDLAND ↗
- Who funds MUSEUM OF THE SOUTHWEST ↗
- Who funds The Fields Edge ↗
- Who funds STARLIGHT THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds TEEN CHALLENGE-ADULT CENTERS OF TEXAS INC ↗
- Who funds MIDLAND COMMUNITY THEATRE INC ↗
- Who funds I-20 WILDLIFE PRESERVE & JENNA WELCH NATURE STUDY CENTER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Scharbauer Foundation Inc · Abell-Hanger Foundation · Pevehouse Family Foundation · Permian Basin Area Foundation · Helen Greathouse Charitable Trust · Beal Foundation · The Henry Foundation · Fmh Foundation · Warren Charitable Foundation · Bryant Family Foundation · Yarborough Foundation · The Fasken Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Hahl Proctor Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Hahl Proctor Charitable Trust?
Find your warmest path to Hahl Proctor Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.