Skip to content

· Private foundation

Haggerty Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$81k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0179% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$192kReligion$176kPhilanthropy$84kArts & Culture$41kHousing & Shelter$18kHealth$10kHuman Services$7kRecreation & Sports$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k20 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $66k
$779
Median grant
10
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LOURDES FOUNDATION$30,000
St Marys$26,000
UNIVERSITY OF ST THOMAS$10,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$2,700
Orange County Rescue Mission$2,000
Community Hope$1,478
CHRISTIAN CENTER$1,300
Individual grant recipient$1,000
BUCKHEAD CHRISTION MINISTRY$1,000
POINT FOUNDATION$1,000
PACE ACADEMY FOUNDATION$1,000
NATIONAL MS SOCIETY$779
Individual grant recipient$520
Individual grant recipient$514
Individual grant recipient$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $100) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Peace House: $100 → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
IA
OH
CT
CA
UT
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$460k · 27 repeat orgs$102k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

27 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
32

Total granted

$460k
$72k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+16%

Still filing today

30%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthReligionRecreation & SportsCrime & LegalAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    University of St Thomas
    5× · 2021–2025 · $65k · revenue +28%
  • BC
    BUCKHEAD CHRISTIAN MINISTRY INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $2k · revenue +33%
  • US
    UTAH SHERIFF'S ASSOCIATION IN
    6× · 2020–2025 · $525 · revenue +55%

Funded once

  • SM
    SAINT MARY CATHOLIC CHURCH
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $13k
  • ST
    ST THERESAS
    one grant, 2024 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Utah Partners for Health

Utah partners for health provides compassionate, comprehensive, quality care to empower underserved individuals, families, and communities in a patient-centered medical home.

Health
2
Utah Public Health Association

The Utah Public Health Association (UPHA) is a statewide membership organization dedicated to improving the health of Utah communities by supporting and representing the public health workforce. UPHA advances public health through…

Health
3
The Community Foundation of Utah

We are utah's partner in philanthropy, pioneering innovation and collaboration to invest in our community today for a brighter tomorrow.

Philanthropy
4
Utah Foundation

Utah foundation's mission is to produce objective, thorough and well- reasoned research and analysis that promotes the effective use of public resources, a thriving economy, a well-prepared workforce and a high quality of life for utahns.…

Public Benefit
5
Utah's Promise

Utah's promise (up) is committed to 100% of kids and families thriving. we unify leaders, partners, communities and systems to achieve that promise.

Philanthropy
6
University of Providence

As expressions of god's healing love, witnessed through the ministry of jesus, we are steadfast in serving all, especially those who are poor and vulnerable.

Education
7
Utah Geological Foundation
—
8
People Helping People

People helping people (php) is dedicated to reducing the number of children living in poverty by teaching low-income women, primarily single moms, how to earn a living wage. each year, 1,000 prospective clients enroll in our employment…

Human Services
9
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
10
Truman Medical Center Incorporated

University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.

Health
11
House of Hope

Treating substance use disorders, rebuilding lives, strengthening families, and empowering women.

—
12
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Park City Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 68 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
12/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST MARYS CATHOLIC CHURCH: $100,500 · OtherST MARYS CATHOLIC CHURCHINTERMOUNTAIN FOUNDATION: $80,000 · OtherINTERMOUNTAIN FOUNDATIONEGYPTIAN THEATER: $40,250 · OtherEGYPTIAN THEATERSt Marys: $26,000 · OtherSt MarysSAINT MARY CATHOLIC CHURCH: $25,000 · OtherSAINT MARY CATHOLIC CHURCHFULLER CENTER FOR HOUSING OF CACHE VALLEY INC: $16,465 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $12,500 · Other+49 more: $67,276 · Other+49 moreLOURDES FOUNDATION INC: $115,000 · EducationLOURDES FOUNDATION INCUniversity of St Thomas: $65,000 · EducationUniversity of St Thomas+1 more: $3,000 · EducationCHRISTIAN CENTER OF PARK CITY: $5,600 · ReligionBUCKHEAD CHRISTIAN MINISTRY INC: $2,000 · ReligionPARK CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $3,000 · PhilanthropyGENEVA NATIONAL FOUNDATION INC DAWN MALL: $250 · PhilanthropyOrange County Rescue Mission Inc: $2,000 · Housing & ShelterNATIONAL ABILITY CENTER: $900 · Recreation & SportsPeople's Health Clicnic: $470 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $100 · HealthPlaying For Life Foundation: $100 · Health
Other$367,991Education$183,000Religion$7,600Philanthropy$3,250Housing & Shelter$2,000Recreation & Sports$900Health$670

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLOURDES FOUNDATION INC: $115,000 over 5y, 3.0% of budgetUniversity of St Thomas: $65,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFULLER CENTER FOR HOUSING OF CACHE VALLEY INC: $16,465 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetCHRISTIAN CENTER OF PARK CITY: $5,600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPOINT FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPARK CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBUCKHEAD CHRISTIAN MINISTRY INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOrange County Rescue Mission Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ABILITY CENTER: $900 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUTAH SHERIFF'S ASSOCIATION IN: $525 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPeople's Health Clicnic: $470 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNTAIN TRAILS FOUNDATION: $450 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGENEVA NATIONAL FOUNDATION INC DAWN MALL: $250 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO AIDS FOUNDATION: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORKSHOPS FOR WARRIORS INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPeace House Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPlaying For Life Foundation: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUTAH FOOD BANK: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF UTAH: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPark City Performances: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LOURDES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds University of St Thomas ↗
  • Who funds FULLER CENTER FOR HOUSING OF CACHE VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN CENTER OF PARK CITY ↗
  • Who funds POINT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PARK CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BUCKHEAD CHRISTIAN MINISTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds Orange County Rescue Mission Inc ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ABILITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds UTAH SHERIFF'S ASSOCIATION IN ↗
  • Who funds People's Health Clicnic ↗
  • Who funds MOUNTAIN TRAILS FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Promontory FoundationUT13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Promontory Foundation · Sad Foundation Inc · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Haggerty Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Haggerty Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Haggerty Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Haggerty Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 68 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Haggerty Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph