Skip to content
H Chase Stone Trust B Xxxxx5009 at a glance

· Private foundation

H Chase Stone Trust B Xxxxx5009

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$190k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$55k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$1.2MPhilanthropy$85kEducation$40kAnimals$40kCivil Rights$38kHuman Services$7k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k8 grants · $135k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $55k
$18,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL MUSEUM OF WORLD WARII AVIATION$55,000
COLORADO SPRINGS CONSERVATORY$25,000
Colorado Springs Philharmonic$20,000
COLORADO SPRINGS PIONEERS MUSEUM$20,000
ART SONG COLORADO$18,000
COLORADO SPRINGS YOUTH SYMPHONY$15,000
CONCRETE COUCH$15,000
YOUTH DOCUMENTARY ACADEMY$12,458
MANITOU ART THEATER$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%COLORADO SPRINGS CHILD NURSERY CENTERS I: $7k → 9%PIKES PEAK PRIDE: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 15 repeat orgs$291k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +25% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
19

Total granted

$1.0M
$236k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+18%

Still filing today

73%
74%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $55k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesCivil RightsYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CS
    COLORADO SPRINGS CONSERVATORY FOUNDATION
    7× · 2019–2025 · $235k · revenue +101%
  • CS
    Colorado Springs Community Ventures Inc
    7× · 2018–2024 · $218k · revenue +31% · 26% of their budget
  • CS
    COLORADO SPRINGS PIONEERS MUSEUM
    5× · 2019–2025 · $105k · revenue +80%

Funded once

  • CM
    CHEYENNE MOUNTAIN ZOO
    one grant, 2021 · $40k
  • CS
    Colorado Springs Philharmonic Orchestragraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $28k · revenue +27%
  • RM
    ROCKY MOUNTAIN PUBLIC BROADCASTING
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fort Collins Symphony Association

Providing entertainment and education through the production of high-quality orchestral music.

—
2
Colorado Jazz Ambassadors
Arts & Culture
3
Colorado Springs Philharmonic Foundation

To raise funds and acquire assets, both real and personal, that will provide financial assistance to the Colorado Springs Philharmonic Orchestra.

Arts & Culture
4
The Center for the Arts

The center for arts, a home for arts and culture, offers engaging opportunities and educational experiences to enrich and expand the life of our community.

Arts & Culture
5
Canyon Concert Ballet

Promotion of ballet and other types of dance throughout the community, by offering dance classes and performances.

Arts & Culture
6
Colorado Springs Convention and Visitors Bureau

Colorado Springs Convention and Visitors Bureau's, now doing business as Visit Colorado Springs (VCOS), primary exempt purpose is promotion of the Pikes Peak Region. VCOS is designed to stimulate the visitor industry in the Pikes Peak…

—
7
Colorado Children's Chorale

The mission of the colorado children's chorale is to share professional choral music with the global community by training excellent young performers.

Arts & Culture
8
Boulder Philharmonic Orchestra

The mission of the boulder philharmonic orchestra is to enrich connections and communities through the power of orchestral music. the boulder philharmonic orchestra presents performances that reflect our community's values, creativity, and…

Arts & Culture
9
Colorado Press Association

Promote the general interest of daily, weekly, and monthly newspapers and online publications, improve editorials and business methods of daily and weekly newspapers, and advance those newspapers' usefulness and influence in the public…

—
10
Colorado Music Festival & Center for Musical Arts

To inspire and connect community members of all ages by providing access to the best of the world's music through education and performance.

Arts & Culture
11
Cincinnati Chamber Orchestra

Cincinnati Chamber Orchestra (CCO) creates intimate, transformative experiences that connect the musically curious.

Arts & Culture
12
Colorado Chamber Players Incorporated

The Colorado Chamber Players presents public private and outreach concerts as well as education through coaching and classroom instruction

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Colorado Springs Conservatory Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Chamber Music With the Veronika String Quartet Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/28
Grantees still filing
21/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COLORADO SPRINGS CONSERVATORY FOUNDATION: $234,700 · Arts & CultureCOLORADO SPRINGS CONSERVATORY FOUNDATIONColorado Springs Community Ventures Inc: $217,500 · Arts & CultureColorado Springs Community Ventures IncCOLORADO SPRINGS PIONEERS MUSEUM: $105,000 · Arts & CultureCOLORADO SPRINGS PIONEERS MUSEUMMANITOU ART THEATRE: $55,000 · Arts & CultureMANITOU ART THEATRENATIONAL MUSEUM OF WORLD WAR II AVIATION INC: $55,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL MUSEUM OF WORLD WAR II AVIATION INCHistoric Manitou Springs Inc: $40,000 · Arts & CultureCONCRETE COUCH: $30,000 · Arts & Culture+10 more: $114,226 · Arts & Culture+10 moreCOLORADO SPRINGS PHILHARMONIC: $90,000 · OtherCOLORADO SPRINGS PHILHARMON…The Chamber Orchestra of the Springs: $65,000 · OtherThe Chamber Orchestra of th…CHEYENNE MOUNTAIN ZOO: $40,000 · OtherCHEYENNE MOUNTAIN ZOOART SONG COLORADO: $36,000 · OtherART SONG COLORADOCOLORADO SPRINGS YOUTH SYMPHONY: $25,000 · OtherCOLORADO SPRINGS YOUTH SYMP…ROCKY MOUNTAIN PUBLIC BROADCASTING: $25,000 · OtherROCKY MOUNTAIN PUBLIC BROAD…GRANTMAKERS IN THE ARTS: $20,000 · OtherGRANTMAKERS IN THE ARTS+5 more: $35,000 · Other+5 morePIKES PEAK COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $85,000 · PhilanthropyYouth Documentary Academy: $32,458 · Youth DevelopmentUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $25,000 · EducationTHE COLORADO COLLEGE: $5,000 · EducationCASA of the Pikes Peak Region: $27,500 · Civil RightsPIKES PEAK PRIDE: $10,000 · Human ServicesCOLORADO SPRINGS CHILD NURSERY CENTERS INC: $6,500 · Human Services
Arts & Culture$851,426Other$336,000Philanthropy$85,000Youth Development$32,458Education$30,000Civil Rights$27,500Human Services$16,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOLORADO SPRINGS CONSERVATORY FOUNDATION: $234,700 over 7y, 3.9% of budgetColorado Springs Community Ventures Inc: $217,500 over 7y, 26% of budgetCOLORADO SPRINGS PIONEERS MUSEUM: $105,000 over 5y, 6.0% of budgetPIKES PEAK COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $85,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetThe Chamber Orchestra of the Springs: $65,000 over 3y, 6.6% of budgetMANITOU ART THEATRE: $55,000 over 3y, 7.2% of budgetHistoric Manitou Springs Inc: $40,000 over 4y, 18% of budgetYouth Documentary Academy: $32,458 over 2y, 5.2% of budgetCONCRETE COUCH: $30,000 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetColorado Springs Philharmonic Orchestra: $28,226 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCASA of the Pikes Peak Region: $27,500 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOTTONWOOD ARTISTS' SCHOOL: $25,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetGRANTMAKERS IN THE ARTS: $20,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCHAMBER MUSIC WITH THE VERONIKA STRING QUARTET INC: $10,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetCOLORADO SPRINGS CHILDREN'S CHORALE: $10,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetPIKES PEAK PRIDE: $10,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetCULTURAL OFFICE OF THE PIKES PEAK REGION: $10,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetColorado Vocal Arts Ensemble: $10,000 over 2y, 7.3% of budgetOpera Theatre of the Rockies: $10,000 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetCOLORADO SPRINGS CHILD NURSERY CENTERS INC: $6,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWESTERN MUSEUM OF MINING & INDUSTRY: $6,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCOLORADO SPRINGS CHORAL SOCIETY: $5,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetTHE COLORADO COLLEGE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHEYENNE MOUNTAIN PUBLIC BROADCAST HOUSE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Bee Vradenburg Founda…El Pomar FoundationThe Joseph Henry Edmo…Pikes Peak Community …INDYGIVE DBA Give Pik…The Buettner Family F…Dusty and Katherine L…Colorado Springs Heal…The Hester E & Edwin …Ent Credit UnionKirkpatrick Family Af…Colorado Gives Founda…
Bee Vradenburg FoundationCO39× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Bee Vradenburg Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · The Joseph Henry Edmondson Foundation · Pikes Peak Community Foundation · INDYGIVE DBA Give Pikes Peak · The Buettner Family Foundation · Dusty and Katherine Loo Foundation Dba Bloom Foundation · Colorado Springs Health Foundation · The Hester E & Edwin W Giddings Foundation · Ent Credit Union · Kirkpatrick Family Affiliated Fund of Occf Inc · Colorado Gives Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization H Chase Stone Trust B Xxxxx5009 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from H Chase Stone Trust B Xxxxx5009. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on H Chase Stone Trust B Xxxxx5009’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home