· Private foundation
Dusty and Katherine Loo Foundation Dba Bloom Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k14 grants · $41k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $160k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $325k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Kansas University Endowment Association | $150,000 |
| Penrose-St Francis Health Foundation | $125,000 |
| Early Connections Learning Centers | $50,000 |
| Red Lodge Area Community Foundation | $30,000 |
| Broadmoor Community Church | $30,000 |
| Trust for Public Land | $25,000 |
| Telluride Science and Research Center | $25,000 |
| Foundation for Colorado Springs Future | $20,000 |
| Colorado Springs Philharmonic | $10,000 |
| Indygive | $10,000 |
| Colorado Springs Downtown Ventures | $10,000 |
| UCCS | $7,000 |
| Rocky Mountain Field Institute | $5,000 |
| Gazette Charities | $5,000 |
| Colorado Springs Pioneers Museum | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $326k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +17% since the first grant, against -9% for the ones you funded once.
36 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 22 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $121k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TKThe Kansas University Endowment Association4× · 2021–2024 · $600k · revenue +24%
- PEPeak Education6× · 2018–2024 · $423k · revenue ×12 · 58% of their budget
- APAtlas Preparatory School Inc2× · 2018–2020 · $125k · revenue +233%
Funded once
- TSTHE SPRINGS RESCUE MISSIONone grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue -9%
- BBBig Brothers Big Sisters of Colorado - Pikeone grant, 2018 · $25k
- GBGreen Box Artsone grant, 2022 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Colorado Springs Convention and Visitors Bureau's, now doing business as Visit Colorado Springs (VCOS), primary exempt purpose is promotion of the Pikes Peak Region. VCOS is designed to stimulate the visitor industry in the Pikes Peak…
Be a catalyst! Ignite our community's passion for nature and science.
Promote the general interest of daily, weekly, and monthly newspapers and online publications, improve editorials and business methods of daily and weekly newspapers, and advance those newspapers' usefulness and influence in the public…
The Center for Nonprofit Excellence strengthens Southern Colorado's nonprofit sector through leadership and resource development, advocacy and collaboration. Together, with our partners, we are co-creating a vibrant community in the Pikes…
AIA Colorado,is the voice of the architecture profession in Colorado. Through advocacy, leadership development, education and resources for architects, the organization supports architecture professionals in designing a better world where…
The mission of the Colorado Physician Health Program Corporation is to promote the health and well-being of physicians and physician assistants through evaluation, treatment referral, support education and research.
To raise funds and acquire assets, both real and personal, that will provide financial assistance to the Colorado Springs Philharmonic Orchestra.
Community radio for northern colorado's (crnc) mission is to strengthen our community by cultivating the mind and spirit - informing, inspiring, and entertaining. crnc strives to meet its mission by operating two public media services -…
The mission of the colorado springs conservatory is to inspire, motivate, and challenge all students to aspire to their highest potential as artists and as human beings through arts immersion studies and community arts advocacy.
Providing entertainment and education through the production of high-quality orchestral music.
To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.
Colorado nonprofit association strengthens colorado's nonprofits through education, connection and advocacy.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pikes Peak Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Old Colorado City Partnership. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
51 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 51 of the 76 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds The Kansas University Endowment Association ↗
- Who funds Peak Education ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC HEALTH INITIATIVES COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COLORADO SPRINGS FINE ARTS CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds United States Olympic and Paralympic Museum ↗
- Who funds PIKES PEAK COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Atlas Preparatory School Inc ↗
- Who funds Cheyenne Village ↗
- Who funds AH HAA SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS ↗
- Who funds PUBLIC BROADCASTING OF COLORADO INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds RAISE THE FUTURE ↗
- Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN PUBLIC MEDIA INC ↗
- Who funds THE SPRINGS RESCUE MISSION ↗
- Who funds COLORADO SPRINGS CHILD NURSERY CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds FOOD TO POWER (FKA COLORADO SPRINGS FOOD RESCUE) ↗
- Who funds THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND ↗
- Who funds INDYGIVE DBA Give Pikes Peak ↗
- Who funds WILLIAM J PALMER PARKS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE COLORADO COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds CONCRETE COUCH ↗
- Who funds RED LODGE AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FII - NATIONAL ↗
- Who funds The Catamount Institute ↗
- Who funds CULTURAL OFFICE OF THE PIKES PEAK REGION ↗
- Who funds Rocky Mountain Field Institute Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Joseph Henry Edmondson Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · Pikes Peak Community Foundation · Colorado Springs Health Foundation · INDYGIVE DBA Give Pikes Peak · Bee Vradenburg Foundation · The John E and Margaret L Lane Foundation · Ent Credit Union · Esther M & Freeman E Everett Charitable · G E Johnson Foundation · The Myron Stratton Home · Pikes Peak United Way
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Dusty and Katherine Loo Foundation Dba Bloom Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Vermont Folklife Center — 90% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Dusty and Katherine Loo Foundation Dba Bloom Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Dusty and Katherine Loo Foundation Dba Bloom Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.