Skip to content

· Private foundation

H Auerbach Est H Auerbach Mem Fd Tr #2

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$244k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$56k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$563kFood & Nutrition$190kHuman Services$173kAnimals$130kEnvironment$123kHealth$85kHousing & Shelter$66kPhilanthropy$40kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $156k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $56k
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SEATUCK ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATION$56,000
LIL DUDES INSECT ACADEMY$46,000
STAIRWAY TO STEM FOUNDATION$40,000
ALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK$20,000
REFUGEE TRANSITIONS$10,000
MOMI MUSEUM OF IMAGINATION AND INNOVATIO$10,000
ST MARYS CENTER$10,000
FOOD BANK OF NEVADA COUNTY INC$10,000
THE FRIENDS OF THE OAKLAND PUBLIC$10,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$8,000
YMCA$7,615
SOUTH YUBA RIVER CITIZENS LEAGUE$6,000
BEAR YUBA LAND TRUST$4,000
NORTH SAN JUAN LIBRARY$3,000
ALAMED POINT COLLABORATIVE INC$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $56k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%EVERYONE HOME: $5k → 14%ALAMED POINT COLLABORATIVE INC: $15k → 10%ALAMED POINT COLLABORATIVE INC: $5k → 10%EVERYONE HOME: $5k → 14%ALAMED POINT COLLABORATIVE INC: $5k → 10%ALAMED POINT COLLABORATIVE INC: $5k → 10%EVERYONE HOME: $5k → 14%ALAMEDA POINT COLLABORATIVE: $5k → 10%ALAMED POINT COLLABORATIVE INC: $3k → 10%ALAMED POINT COLLABORATIVE INC: $3k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
WA
NY
MA
OH
NJ
CT
CA
CO
NE
TN
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 27 repeat orgs$224k to everyone else

27 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
16

Total granted

$1.3M
$174k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+71%
+78%

Still filing today

44%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEnvironmentYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK
    7× · 2019–2025 · $135k · revenue +112%
  • SE
    Seatuck Environmental Association Inc
    3× · 2022–2025 · $86k · revenue +21%
  • RI
    Refugee & Immigrant Transitions
    7× · 2019–2025 · $76k · revenue +136%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $35k · revenue +78%
  • NC
    NEVADA COUNTY FOOD BANK
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Climate Center

The Climate Center is a climate and energy policy nonprofit working to rapidly reduce climate pollution at scale, starting in California.

Education
2
Alameda Emergency Food Dba Alameda Food Bank

Founded in 1977, The Alameda Food Bank is a non-profit organization that helps Alameda residents in need by providing nourishing food in compassionate and respectful manner with the support of dedicated volunteers and local partners.

Food & Nutrition
3
Alameda County Homeless Action Center

HAC assists homeless and mentally ill clients in the long and difficult process of becoming eligible for SSI and MediCal benefits. HAC provides assistance with other public benefits that clients need in the interim to survive until their…

Housing & Shelter
4
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
5
Community Legal Services in East Palo Alto Inc

To provide transformative legal services that enable diverse communities in East Palo Alto and beyond to achieve a secure and thriving future.

Crime & Legal
6
Family Violence Law Center

FVLC helps diverse communities in Alameda County heal from domestic violence and sexual assault, advocating for justice and healthy relationships. We provide survivor-centered legal and crisis intervention services, offer prevention for…

Crime & Legal
7
Alzheimers Services of the East Bay

The mission of Alzheimer's Services of the East Bay is to provide services to individuals with Alzheimer's disease and other related dementia; provide support for their caregivers; and educate and inform the general community about issues…

Health
8
East Bay Community Law Center

East bay community law center's mission is to promote justice and build a more healthy, secure, productive and hopeful community by providing: 1) legal services and policy advocacy that responds to the needs of low-income communities,…

Crime & Legal
9
Bay Area Community Services Housing Corp

Improve the quality of life for individuals in Alameda County, Contra Costa County, Solano County, Monterey County, Sacramento County and the surrounding area in the State of California.

Housing & Shelter
10
East Bay Agency for Children

For more than 70 years, East Bay Agency for Children continues to improve the well-being of children, youth and families by reducing the impact of trauma and social inequalities.

Health
11
Eviction Defense Collaborative Inc

The Eviction Defense Collaborative strives to prevent homelessness, preserveaffordable housing, and protect the diversity of San Francisco. We work toward thesegoals by providing emergency rental assistance and by helping low-income…

Housing & Shelter
12
Sonoma Applied Village Services

Address the homeless crisis in California.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Mary's Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Food Bank of Nevada County. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
14/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BALDWIN UNION SCHOOL DIST: $429,100 · OtherBALDWIN UNION SCHOOL DISTALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $134,681 · OtherALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANKLIL DUDES INSECT ACADEMY: $96,000 · OtherLIL DUDES INSECT ACADEMYIndividual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherSTAIRWAY TO STEM FOUNDATION: $40,000 · Other+32 more: $391,768 · Other+32 moreSeatuck Environmental Association Inc: $86,000 · EnvironmentBear Yuba Land Trust: $17,500 · EnvironmentST MARY'S CENTER INC: $45,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $35,000 · HealthRefugee & Immigrant Transitions: $76,000 · Youth DevelopmentALAMEDA POINT COLLABORATIVE: $41,000 · Human ServicesEveryone Home DC: $15,000 · Human ServicesFood Bank of Nevada County: $45,000 · Food & NutritionWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $16,000 · International
Other$1,141,549Environment$103,500Health$80,000Youth Development$76,000Human Services$56,000Food & Nutrition$45,000International$16,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $134,681 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSeatuck Environmental Association Inc: $86,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetRefugee & Immigrant Transitions: $76,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetFood Bank of Nevada County: $45,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetST MARY'S CENTER INC: $45,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetALAMEDA POINT COLLABORATIVE: $41,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $35,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FRIENDS OF THE OAKLAND PUBLIC LIBRARY: $29,000 over 2y, 8.4% of budgetST MARY'S CENTER: $25,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSOUTH YUBA RIVER CITIZENS LEAGUE: $19,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBear Yuba Land Trust: $17,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $16,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEveryone Home DC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCharlotte Maxwell Clinic: $5,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEAST OAKLAND COMMUNITY PROJECT: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetElders Action Network Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetBROOKSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PTO: $1,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds Seatuck Environmental Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds Refugee & Immigrant Transitions ↗
  • Who funds Food Bank of Nevada County ↗
  • Who funds ST MARY'S CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ALAMEDA POINT COLLABORATIVE ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FRIENDS OF THE OAKLAND PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds ST MARY'S CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH YUBA RIVER CITIZENS LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds Bear Yuba Land Trust ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds Everyone Home DC ↗
  • Who funds THE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Charlotte Maxwell Clinic ↗
  • Who funds SOCIAL GOOD FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds EAST OAKLAND COMMUNITY PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds Elders Action Network Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

East Bay Community FoundationCA16.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: East Bay Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Sunlight Giving · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Network for Good · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization H Auerbach Est H Auerbach Mem Fd Tr #2 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from H Auerbach Est H Auerbach Mem Fd Tr #2. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on H Auerbach Est H Auerbach Mem Fd Tr #2’s filings →

    More from the funding graph