Skip to content
Greater Keller Womens Club Foundation Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Greater Keller Womens Club Foundation Inc

Charitable Community Aid

$252k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$17k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$239kHealth$229kFood & Nutrition$54kCrime & Legal$42kYouth Development$35kPhilanthropy$21kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 12 grants below total $108,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $251,512 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $143,512 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $39k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $69k
$8,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$21M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Victory Therapeutic Center Inc$17,000
Neuro Assistance Foundation$17,000
Safehaven of Tarrant County$15,000
Metroport Meals on Wheels Inc$10,000
Christs Haven for Children$10,000
Keller Community Senior Fund$8,000
I Can Still Shine Program$6,000
Ronald McDonald House of Fort Worth$5,000
Warm Foundation Inc dba The WARM Pl$5,000
Community Enrichment Center$5,000
Gill Children Services Inc$5,000
North Texas SNAP$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $108k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%North Texas SNAP: $5k → 11%North Texas SNAP: $5k → 11%Safehaven of Tarrant County: $16k → 11%Safehaven of Tarrant County: $16k → 11%Safehaven of Tarrant County: $15k → 11%Safehaven of Tarrant County: $8k → 11%Community Enrichment Center: $15k → 11%COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER: $8k → 11%Community Enrichment Center: $6k → 11%Community Enrichment Center: $5k → 11%Stepping Stones Foundation: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$683k · 16 repeat orgs$53k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +51% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
5

Total granted

$683k
$48k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+13%

Still filing today

81%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyArts & CultureCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NA
    NEURO ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION
    6× · 2018–2024 · $100k · revenue +218%
  • CH
    Christ's Haven for Children Inc
    6× · 2018–2024 · $59k · revenue +67%
  • SO
    SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY
    4× · 2020–2024 · $54k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • JP
    JUNIOR PLAYERS GUILD
    3× · 2022–2024 · $14k · revenue -27%
  • MS
    Me Squared Cancer Foundation
    3× · 2022–2024 · $12k · revenue -34%
  • SS
    Stepping Stones Foundationgraduated
    3× · 2022–2024 · $10k · revenue +55%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Katy Christian Ministries

See Schedule O.Katy Christian Ministries (KCM) is a social service non-profit that serves the Katy/West Houston area. KCM's Social Service Department offers emergency financial assistance, a Food Pantry, a Crisis Center that houses the…

Human Services
2
Respite Care of San Antonio Inc

Respite Care of San Antonio is dedicated to providing specialized care for children with special needs and complex medical conditions through a General Residential Operation (GRO), Developmental Childcare Center, and Community Programs for…

Human Services
3
Casa of Williamson County Texas

CASA of Williamson County, TX exists to empower community volunteers to advocate for children who have experienced abuse or neglect to find loving, safe, and permanent homes.

Crime & Legal
4
Central Texas Children's Home

To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.

Human Services
5
Ft Bend County Child Advocates Inc

Fort Bend County Child Advocates, Inc. provides a voice, heals the hurt and breaks the cycle of abuse and neglect for children in Fort Bend County.

Civil Rights
6
Trauma Support Services of North Texas

The mission of Trauma Support Services is to provide healing and resilience for individuals and communities affected by trauma through accessible mental health therapy and trauma-informed education.

Public Safety & Disaster
7
Starr of Hope

The mission of STARR of Hope, in collaboration with the community resources, is to provide prevention, intervention, and advocacy for women and children who experience domestic abuse or violence in Starr, Zapata and Jim Hogg Counties.

Housing & Shelter
8
Crisis Assistance Center Inc dba Community Assistance Center

To provide emergency assistance to people in Montgomery County, TX who are in an unexpected crisis.

Human Services
9
Casa of South Texas Inc

Child Advocacy

Human Services
10
Montgomery County Childrens Advocacy Center Inc

Serves abused children through a comprehensive approach to services for abused children and their families.

Crime & Legal
11
Womens Center of Brazoria County Inc

Comprehensive service to domestic violence and sexual assault victims

Human Services
12
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa

Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Casa of Tarrant County Inc; the most unlike its peers is I Can Still Shine Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
12/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $116,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientChrist's Haven for Children Inc: $58,500 · OtherChrist's Haven for Children IncMETROPORT MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $54,000 · OtherMETROPORT MEALS ON WHEELS INCWings of a Butterfly: $35,000 · OtherWings of a ButterflyI CAN STILL SHINE INC: $18,000 · OtherI CAN STILL SHINE INCSAFE HAVEN: $15,000 · OtherKELLER COMMUNITY SENIOR FUND INC: $14,000 · OtherMID-CITIES CARE CORPS: $13,500 · Other+2 more: $10,000 · OtherVICTORY THERAPEUTIC CENTER INC: $107,000 · HealthVICTORY THERAPEUTIC CENTER INCNEURO ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION: $100,350 · HealthNEURO ASSISTANCE FOUNDATIONMe Squared Cancer Foundation: $12,000 · HealthSUMMER SANTA: $11,000 · HealthSAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $54,000 · Human ServicesSAFEHAVEN OF TAR…COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER INC: $33,500 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY ENRICH…Stepping Stones Foundation: $10,000 · Human ServicesStepping Stones …NORTH TEXAS SNAP INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesNORTH TEXAS SNAP…GILL CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $22,500 · EducationWARM FOUNDATION: $21,000 · PhilanthropyJUNIOR PLAYERS GUILD: $14,000 · Arts & CultureCASA OF TARRANT COUNTY INC: $7,000 · Civil Rights
Other$334,000Health$230,350Human Services$107,500Education$22,500Philanthropy$21,000Arts & Culture$14,000Civil Rights$7,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVICTORY THERAPEUTIC CENTER INC: $107,000 over 7y, 5.0% of budgetNEURO ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION: $100,350 over 6y, 4.8% of budgetChrist's Haven for Children Inc: $58,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetSAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $54,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMETROPORT MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $54,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetWings of a Butterfly: $35,000 over 4y, 5.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER INC: $33,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetGILL CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $22,500 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetWARM FOUNDATION: $21,000 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetI CAN STILL SHINE INC: $18,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetJUNIOR PLAYERS GUILD: $14,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetMID-CITIES CARE CORPS: $13,500 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetMe Squared Cancer Foundation: $12,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetSUMMER SANTA: $11,000 over 3y, 6.7% of budgetStepping Stones Foundation: $10,000 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetNORTH TEXAS SNAP INC: $10,000 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetCASA OF TARRANT COUNTY INC: $7,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF FORT WORTH INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHRISTIAN COMMUNITY STOREHOUSE INC: $5,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundatio…Colleyville Woman's C…Bnsf Railway Foundati…Southlake Women's Clu…Ken W Davis FoundationThomas M Helen McKee …Textron Charitable Tr…Amon G Carter Foundat…Slocum Family Foundat…Coserv Charitable Fou…Sid W Richardson Foun…The Rees-Jones Founda…
Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX33.2× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Colleyville Woman's Club · Bnsf Railway Foundation · Southlake Women's Club Foundation · Ken W Davis Foundation · Thomas M Helen McKee & John P Ryan Fo John P Ryan Foundation Inc · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · Amon G Carter Foundation · Slocum Family Foundation · Coserv Charitable Foundation · Sid W Richardson Foundation · The Rees-Jones Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Greater Keller Womens Club Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Greater Keller Womens Club Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Greater Keller Womens Club Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Greater Keller Womens Club Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Greater Keller Womens Club’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home