Skip to content
Greater Douglas United Way at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Greater Douglas United Way

To unite contributors, providers, and users of human services in a voluntary and cooperative effort to effectively meet community need.

$130k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$51k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Human Services$881kHealth$393kEducation$107kPublic Safety & Disaster$77kReligion$70kFood & Nutrition$67kCommunity Improvement$65kAnimals$57kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $88,379, the rows itemized in this filing. The $130,144 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $41,765 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $17k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $51k
$7,971
Median grant
2
States reached
$499k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHRISTMAS FOR KIDS - DOUGLAS COUNTY$51,231
RELAY FOR LIFE - AMERICAN CANCER SO$17,155
PHOENIX SCHOOL OF ROSEBURG$7,971
SALVATION ARMY$6,711
UNITED COMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK$5,311
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $821k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $55k → 14%CHRISTMAS FOR KIDS - DOUGLAS COUNTY: $125k → 17%CHRISTMAS FOR KIDS - DOUGLAS COUNTY: $116k → 17%CHRISTMAS FOR KIDS - DOUGLAS COUNTY: $95k → 17%CHRISTMAS FOR KIDS - DOUGLAS COUNTY: $85k → 17%CHRISTMAS FOR KIDS - DOUGLAS COUNTY: $51k → 17%UNITED COMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK: $33k → 17%UNITED COMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK: $27k → 17%UNITED COMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK: $20k → 17%UNITED COMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK: $20k → 17%UNITED COMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK: $15k → 17%PEACE AT HOME ADVOCACY CENTER: $14k → 17%FAMILY DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $13k → 17%FISH OF ROSEBURG: $11k → 17%PEACE AT HOME ADVOCACY CENTER: $10k → 17%PEACE AT HOME ADVOCACY CENTER: $10k → 17%BATTERED PERSON'S ADVOCACY: $9k → 17%FAMILY DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $9k → 17%FAMILY DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $9k → 17%FAMILY DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $9k → 17%FISH OF ROSEBURG: $9k → 17%PEACE AT HOME ADVOCACY CENTER: $9k → 17%UMPQUA VALLEY DISABILITIES NETWORK: $8k → 17%FISH OF ROSEBURG: $8k → 17%FAMILY DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $7k → 17%UMPQUA VALLEY DISABILITIES NETWORK: $7k → 17%FISH OF ROSEBURG: $7k → 17%FISH OF ROSEBURG: $7k → 17%UMPQUA VALLEY DISABILITIES NETWORK: $7k → 17%UMPQUA VALLEY DISABILITIES NETWORK: $6k → 17%ROSEBURG DREAM CENTER: $5k → 17%UNITED COMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
OR
CA
MO
VA
AZ
KS
NC
DC
LA
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 23 repeat orgs$199k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +28% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
13

Total granted

$1.6M
$199k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+16%

Still filing today

65%
77%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentAnimalsPublic BenefitReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UC
    UNITED COMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK
    7× · 2017–2025 · $119k · revenue +81%
  • PS
    PHOENIX SCHOOL OF ROSEBURG
    7× · 2017–2025 · $107k · revenue +313%
  • SG
    SAVING GRACE INC DBA SAVING GRACE HUMANE SOCIETY
    6× · 2017–2024 · $52k · revenue +164%

Funded once

  • GR
    GLIDE REVITALIZATION
    one grant, 2021 · $65k · revenue -5%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branchesgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $55k · revenue +27%
  • SF
    SUTHERLIN FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER
    2× · 2017–2019 · $12k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Douglas County Children's Center Inc

Douglas cares strives to eradicate child abuse and neglect in douglas county through effective, compassionate reponse and prevention, thereby protecting children and uplifting families. our vision: douglas county is a community full of…

Crime & Legal
2
Douglas County Visiting Nurses Association Inc

Improving quality of life through compassionate patient care, wherever you call home.

—
3
United Children's Services of Bennington County Inc

Children's services

Human Services
4
Saving Grace

Saving grace offers safety, hope, and healing to survivors of intimiate partner violence and sexual assault and engages central oregon to build life free from violence.

Human Services
5
Kids Crossing

Kids crossing's vision is to provide a safe and caring home for every child. our mission is to strengthen families so they may provide the best care for those children entrusted to them.

Human Services
6
Portland Adventist Medical Center

Living God's love by inspiring health, wholeness and hope.

Health
7
Adams County Pet Rescue

Rescue, care, and find homes for abandoned and/or abused animals.

Animals
8
Humane Society of Douglas County

To feed, shelter, and provide medical care to abandoned and lost animals

Animals
9
Union Rescue Mission

The union rescue mission serves the forgotten, abused, and addicted by providing an environment where the love and compassion of jesus christ helps people overcome life difficulties.

Housing & Shelter
10
Mid-Columbia Medical Center

Living God's love by inspiring health, wholeness, and hope.

Health
11
Crossnore Communities for Children

Crossnore communities for children champions the well being of children and families by fostering innovative change that weaves a fabric of resilience in homes, schools, and communities.

Health
12
Oregon Casa Network

To lead oregon's casa programs to provide a strong voice for every abused and neglected child

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Doernbecher Children's Hospital Group Return; the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/34
Grantees still filing
23/34
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Christmas for Kids of Douglas County: $472,664 · Human ServicesChristmas for Kids of Douglas CountyUNITED COMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK: $119,449 · Human ServicesUNITED COMMUNITY ACTION NETWORKAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $55,030 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapter…PEACE AT HOME ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $51,178 · Human ServicesPEACE AT HOME ADVOCACY CENTER INCFAMILY DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $47,334 · Human ServicesFAMILY DEVELOPMENT CENTERTHE FISH OF ROSEBURG: $41,530 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $37,619 · Human Services+2 more: $33,387 · Human ServicesTHE SALVATION ARMY: $84,953 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYDOERNBECHER CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL GROUP RETURN: $74,807 · OtherDOERNBECHER CHILDREN'S H…GLIDE HELPING HANDS: $72,000 · OtherGLIDE HELPING HANDSST JOSEPH CHURCH: $25,443 · OtherST JOSEPH CHURCHUPLIFT MINISTY INC: $24,119 · OtherUPLIFT MINISTY INCHARVEST CHRISTIAN ASSEMBLY: $18,150 · OtherBEREAN FUNDAMENTAL CHURCH OF WEED CALIFORNIA: $16,078 · OtherTHE CHRISTIAN RELIEF FUND: $14,501 · Other+8 more: $72,061 · Other+8 moreAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $243,554 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER S…SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $24,548 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITAL…American Diabetes Association: $15,092 · Health+1 more: $7,428 · HealthPHOENIX SCHOOL OF ROSEBURG: $107,168 · EducationGLIDE REVITALIZATION: $65,000 · Public BenefitSAVING GRACE INC DBA SAVING GRACE HUMANE SOCIETY: $51,838 · AnimalsANIMAL SHELTER PARTNERS: $5,223 · AnimalsPACIFIC CREST COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $40,642 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS OF OREGON & SW WASHINGTON INC: $6,365 · Youth DevelopmentFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $5,950 · Youth Development
Human Services$858,191Other$402,112Health$290,622Education$107,168Public Benefit$65,000Animals$57,061Youth Development$52,957

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetChristmas for Kids of Douglas County: $472,664 over 5y, 78% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $243,554 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED COMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK: $119,449 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetPHOENIX SCHOOL OF ROSEBURG: $107,168 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetGLIDE REVITALIZATION: $65,000 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $55,030 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAVING GRACE INC DBA SAVING GRACE HUMANE SOCIETY: $51,838 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetPEACE AT HOME ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $51,178 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetFAMILY DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $47,334 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetTHE FISH OF ROSEBURG: $41,530 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetPACIFIC CREST COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $40,642 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $37,619 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUMPQUA VALLEY DISABILITIES NETWORK: $27,979 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $24,548 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $15,092 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHRISTIAN RELIEF FUND: $14,501 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCASA OF DOUGLAS COUNTY INC: $11,407 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetThe Against Malaria Foundation: $7,428 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF OREGON & SW WASHINGTON INC: $6,365 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUMPQUA VALLEY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $6,350 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $5,950 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROSEBURG DREAM CENTER INC: $5,408 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $5,194 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ford Family Found…The Oregon Community …Hunt C Giles Char - M…John & Jean Loosley C…Umpqua Bank Charitabl…The Roundhouse Founda…Briggs Loosley Founda…First Interstate Banc…Meyer Memorial TrustThe Autzen FoundationNoble B Goettel Chari…Hanna Family Perpetua…
The Ford Family FoundationOR33.5× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ford Family Foundation · The Oregon Community Foundation · Hunt C Giles Char - Main · John & Jean Loosley Charitable Foundation · Umpqua Bank Charitable Foundation · The Roundhouse Foundation · Briggs Loosley Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Meyer Memorial Trust · The Autzen Foundation · Noble B Goettel Charitable Trust · Hanna Family Perpetual Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Greater Douglas United Way funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Greater Douglas United Way. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 41%
  • Umpqua Valley Disabilities Network: 89% of income from government
  • Glide Revitalization: 87% of income from government
  • United Community Action Network: 82% of income from government
  • Family Development Center: 71% of income from government
  • Phoenix School of Roseburg: 41% of income from government
  • Girl Scouts of Oregon & Sw Washington Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Casa of Douglas County Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
4rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Greater Douglas United Way’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home