Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Grace Roberti Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$102k
Granted FY2024still arriving
28
Grants FY2024still arriving
11
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What you fund
0190% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

Health$102kHousing & Shelter$83kHuman Services$69kReligion$65kRecreation & Sports$54kYouth Development$48kPublic Safety & Disaster$46kEducation$34kOther$0
02FY2024 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k27 grants · $90k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
$3,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LIVNGSTON ICE HOCKEY$12,000
ROBERTI COMMUNITY HOUSE$9,500
SOUTHGATE CHURCH$8,500
BIG LIFE FOUNDATION$5,667
LURIE CHILDRENS HOSP FOUNDATION$5,000
ZACHARIAHS ACRES$5,000
UNIV OF DELAWARE OFFICE OF CONTROL$5,000
VOLUNTEER FLORIDA FOUNDATION$5,000
SOUTH BREVARD SHARING CENTER$5,000
CIA OFFICERS MEM FD$4,000
NANAS CHILDRENS HOME$4,000
MERCY HOME FOR BOYS GIRLS$4,000
YOUNG AT HEART$3,667
THE MORGAN PROJECT$3,000
THIRD OPTION FOUNDATION$3,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $127k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 14% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SOUTH BREVARD SHARING CENTER: $5k → 10%ZACHARIAHS ACRES: $6k → 5%ROBERTI COMMUNITY HOUSE: $13k → 8%LOUDOUN ABUSED WOMENS SHELTER: $1k → 4%SOUTH BREVARD SHARING CENTER: $4k → 10%ZACHARIAHS ACRES: $5k → 5%ROBERTI COMMUNITY HOUSE: $13k → 8%LOUDOUN ABUSED WOMENS SHELTER: $1k → 4%SOUTH BREVARD SHARING CENTER: $1k → 10%ZACHARIAHS ACRES: $5k → 5%ROBERTI COMMUNITY HOUSE: $12k → 8%LOUDOUN ABUSED WOMENS SHELTER: $500 → 4%ZACHARIAHS ACRES: $5k → 5%ROBERTI COMMUNITY HOUSE: $11k → 8%LOUDOUN ABUSED WOMENS SHELTER: $500 → 4%SOUTH BREVARD WOMENS CENTER: $6k → 10%ZACHARIAHS ACRES: $4k → 5%ROBERTI COMMUNITY HOUSE: $11k → 8%LOUDOUN ABUSED WOMENS SHELTER: $500 → 4%ZACHARIAHS ACRES: $2k → 5%ROBERTI COMMUNITY HOUSE: $10k → 8%ZACHARIAHS ACRES: $2k → 5%ROBERTI COMMUNITY HOUSE: $7k → 8%MISERICORDIA HOME: $1k → 14%MOTHERS TRUST FDN: $1k → 8%TURNING POINT: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
IL
WI
NY
PA
NJ
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
DC
AL
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$592k · 39 repeat orgs$72k to everyone else

39 repeat relationships — 25 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

39
24

Total granted

$592k
$62k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+48%

Still filing today

41%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterPublic Safety & DisasterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ZA
    ZACHARIAH'S ACRES INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $29k · revenue +164%
  • BL
    BIG LIFE FOUNDATION USA
    5× · 2020–2024 · $27k · revenue +101%
  • RU
    Rush University Medical Center
    7× · 2018–2024 · $23k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • JD
    JUVENILE DIABETES ESEARCH FDN
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • HL
    HAPPY LANDINGS HOMES INC
    one grant, 2019 · $7k · revenue -99%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Livingston Memorial Visiting Nurse Association

Livingston provides a variety of home health services ranging from rehabilitative care to hospice care of the highest quality in the most cost-effective manner to residents of ventura county.

Health
2
Livingston Family Foundation
Philanthropy
3
Livingston Memorial Foundation co Musick Peeler & Garrett Llp
4
Livingston Hospital Foundation Inc

Promote the improvement of the facilities and services of the hospital with financial support

Health
5
Fire Department of Liberty Township

Firefighting and emergency medical services

6
Lurie Children's Surgical Foundation Inc

Provide pediatric and subspecialty surgical, research, and educational services.

7
Hibiscus Children's Center Inc

To provide temporary shelter for abused and neglected children and support families at risk of abuse.

Housing & Shelter
8
Livingston Community Health

To provide comprehensive primary and preventive health care services to all patients regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
9
South East Livingston Co Ambulance Serv

Provide ambulance services to residents of south eastern livingston county, illinois and surrounding areas.

10
Chicago Survivors Inc

Offer crisis intervention, supportive counseling and comprehensive referral services to surviving family members throughout chicago following homicide; provide training in sensitive and effective communication with and treatment of…

Youth Development
11
Licking Memorial Hospital

Licking memorial hospital exists to improve the health of the community.

Health
12
Medical Dental Staff of Morristown Mem Hospital

The mission of the organization is to facilitate and develop an environment of patient-oriented care that serves the health needs of morristown medical center patients. the organization maintains physicians committed to the excellence of…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Loudoun Citizens for Social Justice and the most unlike its peers is The Roberti Community House. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyWildlife Rehabilitation Cen…Food Pantries & AssistanceVolunteer Fire DepartmentsClassical Music EnsemblesChristian Missionary Organi…Veteran Support ServicesCommunity Health CentersDomestic Violence Crisis Se…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%3%<5yr14%9%5–10yr19%18%10–20yr16%24%20–35yr13%30%35–55yr16%15%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%5%<5yr14%20%5–10yr19%20%10–20yr16%12%20–35yr13%23%35–55yr16%20%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/35
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,530

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/30
Grantees still filing
21/30
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CIA OFFICERS MEM FD — $29,000 · OtherCIA OFFICERS MEM FDBREVARD SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC — $28,000 · OtherBREVARD SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INCMISSION OF OUR LADY OF MERCY — $26,000 · OtherMISSION OF OUR LADY OF MERCYSOUTHGATE CHURCH — $25,500 · OtherSOUTHGATE CHURCHST PATRICK CHURCH — $25,166 · OtherST PATRICK CHURCHYOUNG AT HEART — $21,834 · OtherYOUNG AT HEARTUNIV OF DELAWARE OFFICE OF CONTROL — $21,000 · OtherUNIV OF DELAWARE OFFICE OF CONTROLLIVINGSTON FIRST AID SQUAD INC — $17,000 · OtherIAMRA — $14,167 · Other+37 more — $181,333 · Other+37 moreThe Roberti Community House — $76,000 · Human ServicesThe Roberti Community…ZACHARIAH'S ACRES INC — $28,500 · Human ServicesZACHARIAH'S ACRES INCSOUTH BREVARD SHARING CENTER INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesSOUTH BREVARD SHARING…SOUTH BREVARD WOMEN'S CENTER INC — $6,000 · Human Services+4 more — $6,500 · Human ServicesLivingston Ice Hockey Inc — $22,000 · Recreation & SportsKINNELON HOCKEY CLUB INC — $20,000 · Recreation & SportsKINNELON SOCCER CLUB INC — $6,000 · Recreation & SportsLIVINGSTON SOCCER CLUB INC — $2,000 · Recreation & SportsBIG LIFE FOUNDATION USA — $27,000 · AnimalsNANA'S CHILDREN'S HOME INC — $20,000 · Housing & ShelterHAPPY LANDINGS HOMES INC — $7,000 · Housing & ShelterRush University Medical Center — $23,000 · HealthHORIZONS FOR THE BLIND — $1,000 · HealthFace the Future Foundation — $1,000 · HealthDONOR OUTREACH FOR VETERANS CORP — $1,000 · HealthLIVINGSTON FIRE DEPARTMENT INC — $17,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$389,000Human Services$127,000Recreation & Sports$50,000Animals$27,000Housing & Shelter$27,000Health$26,000Public Safety & Disaster$17,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetThe Roberti Community House — $76,000 over 7y, 2.1% of budgetZACHARIAH'S ACRES INC — $28,500 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetBREVARD SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC — $28,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetBIG LIFE FOUNDATION USA — $27,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetRush University Medical Center — $23,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetLivingston Ice Hockey Inc — $22,000 over 2y, 49% of budgetKINNELON HOCKEY CLUB INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetNANA'S CHILDREN'S HOME INC — $20,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetLIVINGSTON FIRE DEPARTMENT INC — $17,000 over 4y, 5.4% of budgetLIVINGSTON FIRST AID SQUAD INC — $17,000 over 3y, 4.7% of budgetSOUTH BREVARD SHARING CENTER INC — $10,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetHAPPY LANDINGS HOMES INC — $7,000 over 1y, 6.9% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC — $6,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetKINNELON SOCCER CLUB INC — $6,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetSOUTH BREVARD WOMEN'S CENTER INC — $6,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetVOLUNTEER FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHADLEY INSTITUTE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED — $4,750 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLOUDOUN CITIZENS FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE — $3,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSPOOKSTOCK FOUNDATION — $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MORGAN PROJECT — $3,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHORIZONS FOR THE BLIND — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTravis Manion Foundation — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFace the Future Foundation — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTurning Point Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDONOR OUTREACH FOR VETERANS CORP — $1,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetMISERICORDIA HOME — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA CLARITA MASTER CHORALE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Roberti Community House
  • Who funds ZACHARIAH'S ACRES INC
  • Who funds BREVARD SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds BIG LIFE FOUNDATION USA
  • Who funds Rush University Medical Center
  • Who funds Livingston Ice Hockey Inc
  • Who funds KINNELON HOCKEY CLUB INC
  • Who funds NANA'S CHILDREN'S HOME INC
  • Who funds LIVINGSTON FIRE DEPARTMENT INC
  • Who funds LIVINGSTON FIRST AID SQUAD INC
  • Who funds SOUTH BREVARD SHARING CENTER INC
  • Who funds HAPPY LANDINGS HOMES INC
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC
  • Who funds KINNELON SOCCER CLUB INC
  • Who funds SOUTH BREVARD WOMEN'S CENTER INC
  • Who funds VOLUNTEER FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Raymond James Charitable Endowment FundFL11× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Grace Roberti Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 90%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 45%
  • South Brevard Women's Center Inc45% of income from government
  • Volunteer Florida Foundation Inc2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
9get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Grace Roberti Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Grace Roberti Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 66 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph