Skip to content
Plinth
Funding

Illinois · Nonprofit

HORIZONS FOR THE BLIND

HORIZONS FOR THE BLIND (Illinois) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $379,995 to it, the largest being FOGLIA FAMILY FOUNDATION ($265,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$3.1M
Revenue FY2025
7
Funders on record
$380k
Grants received
$7.1M
Net assets
3/7 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 4%

Against its field

HORIZONS FOR THE BLIND runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 3,968 health nonprofits its size.

Operating margin38% · top quartile
Months of reserve10.5mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)4% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 3,968 health nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($2.3M) Expenses 100 ($1.7M) Net assets 100 ($1.7M)2018 Revenue 93 ($2.2M) Expenses 111 ($1.9M) Net assets 117 ($2.0M)2019 Revenue 87 ($2.0M) Expenses 105 ($1.8M) Net assets 133 ($2.3M)2020 Revenue 74 ($1.7M) Expenses 84 ($1.4M) Net assets 152 ($2.6M)2021 Revenue 99 ($2.3M) Expenses 84 ($1.4M) Net assets 211 ($3.6M)2022 Revenue 82 ($1.9M) Expenses 82 ($1.4M) Net assets 237 ($4.0M)2023 Revenue 104 ($2.4M) Expenses 91 ($1.5M) Net assets 292 ($5.0M)2024 Revenue 103 ($2.4M) Expenses 101 ($1.7M) Net assets 336 ($5.7M)2025 Revenue 135 ($3.1M) Expenses 116 ($1.9M) Net assets 418 ($7.1M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (135)Expenses (116)Net assets (418)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2021 17%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

2% of HORIZONS FOR THE BLIND’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (51% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 8,590 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 0 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$645k
17
$292k
18
$267k
19
$326k
20
$878k
21
$532k
22
$904k
23
$703k
24
$1.2M
25
11
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2018 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 2 funders, grant income rose $1k → $50k.

3 of 7 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)30% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of HORIZONS FOR THE BLIND’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

HORIZONS FOR THE BLIND leans on a few funders — its largest provides 70% of grant income and the top three 99%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

30% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund HORIZONS FOR THE BLIND.

70%
largest funder
99%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2018 100% · 2019 100% · 2020 80% · 2021 50% · 2022 100% · 2023 100%broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of HORIZONS FOR THE BLIND's grant income comes from Illinois funders.

IL
NY

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

18
19
21
23
Illinois out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $113k arriving through sponsors registered in 3 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 7 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like HORIZONS FOR THE BLIND

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Illinois

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

93% of spending goes to programs.

Program 93%Management 6%Fundraising 1%

Governance

7
board members
86%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

33%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

IL

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for HORIZONS FOR THE BLIND: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds HORIZONS FOR THE BLIND?
HORIZONS FOR THE BLIND (Illinois) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $379,995 to it, the largest being FOGLIA FAMILY FOUNDATION ($265,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does HORIZONS FOR THE BLIND have?
IRS filings report 7 organizations giving $379,995 in grants to HORIZONS FOR THE BLIND, 3 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of HORIZONS FOR THE BLIND?
FOGLIA FAMILY FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $265,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like HORIZONS FOR THE BLIND find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Illinois. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 7funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing