Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Global Health Corps Inc

The organization's mission is to develop a strong and diverse network of young changemakers to transform health systems.

$802k
Granted FY2022
7
Grants FY2022
5
States reached
$71k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2022.

International$1.8MHealth$1.6MHuman Services$183kEducation$120kCommunity Improvement$63kYouth Development$45kRecreation & Sports$6k
02FY2022 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 7 grants below total $234,982 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $802,224 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $567,242 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2022

  • $10k–50k6 grants · $164k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $71k
$25,009
Median grant
5
States reached
$3.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CLINTON HEALTH ACCESS INIT$71,023
LIFENET INTERNATIONAL$44,871
PARTNERS IN HEALTH$40,907
AMREF HEALTH AFRICA INC$25,009
MASS DESIGN GROUP LTD$24,045
ELIZABETH GLASER PEDIATRIC AIDS FOUNDATION$16,197
PATH$12,930
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–19, $317k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 84% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FOUND FOR COMM DEVEL & EMPOW: $26k → 7%FOUND FOR COMM DEVEL & EMPOW: $17k → 7%FOUNDATION FOR COMMUNITY DEVE: $9k → 7%HIPS: $62k → 14%COVENANT HOUSE: $78k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $70k → 17%HIPS: $20k → 14%COVENANT HOUSE: $35k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
ID
MI
NY
MA
NJ
CA
MO
VA
MD
AZ
NC
DC
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.2M · 32 repeat orgs$573k to everyone else

32 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2022, 26 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
19

Total granted

$3.2M
$548k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+41%

Still filing today

88%
79%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
InternationalHealthEducationHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    CLINTON HEALTH ACCESS INITIATIVE INC
    5× · 2018–2022 · $347k · revenue +40%
  • PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION
    6× · 2017–2022 · $282k · revenue +120%
  • CH
    COVENANT HOUSE
    3× · 2017–2019 · $183k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • ID
    INTERAMERICAN DEVELOP BANK
    one grant, 2018 · $47k
  • TB
    THE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NEWARK INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $45k · revenue +123%
  • BG
    BUSH GLOBAL HEALTH INITIATIVE
    one grant, 2018 · $42k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pathfinder International

Pathfinder expands access to sexual and reproductive health services, opening the door to opportunities for women and all individuals to thrive-economically, educationally, and civically. driven by our country-led leadership and local…

International
2
Engenderhealth Inc

Engenderhealth envisions a gender-equal world where all people have the agency, resources, and opportunities to live healthy lives.(see schedule o)

International
3
Women in Global Health Inc

Women in global health (wgh) is a global movement and organization that brings together all genders and backgrounds to achieve gender equality in global health leadership.

Public Benefit
4
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
5
Project Hope - the People-to-People Health Foundation Inc

To conduct and support programs and activities aimed at solving some of the world's greatest public health challenges, with a specific focus on enabling health workers to have the greatest possible impact on the health of the people they…

International
6
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
7
Mali Health Organizing Project Inc

Mali Health improves maternal and child health by supporting women, communities, and the community health system to develop local solutions that ensure every mother and child has access to quality primary care. We aim to end preventable…

Community Improvement
8
MRIGlobal

To improve the lives of people through innovative scientific and engineering research.

Science & Tech
9
HDIInc

HDI`s mission is to advance world public health and human dignity, especially the health and socioeconomic situation of under-served populations which more others are significantly constrained by preventable, degrading disease.

International
10
Intealth

See schedule oto serve the public by:- assuring the qualifications of health care professionals- providing primary-source verification of credentials of health careprofessionals, as they serve throughout the world- supporting international…

Education
11
Health Care Without Harm

The mission of health care without harm (hcwh) is to transform health care worldwide so that it reduces its environmental footprint, becomes a community anchor for sustainability and a leader in the global movement for environmental health…

Environment
12
Public Health Institute

Public health institute generates and promotes research, leadership and partnerships to build capacity for strong public health policy, programs, systems and practices.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Evidence Action and the most unlike its peers is Build Health International Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyChristian Missionary Organi…Affordable Housing Developm…Pregnancy Support ServicesUrban Agriculture & Food Ac…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Youth Development CentersChild and Family ServicesCommunity Health Centers
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%48%10–20yr16%19%20–35yr13%12%35–55yr16%21%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%49%10–20yr16%21%20–35yr13%15%35–55yr16%15%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%1/52
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,513

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

49 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 49 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
44/49
Grantees still filing
29/49
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CLINTON HEALTH ACCESS INITIATIVE INC — $347,375 · InternationalCLINTON HEALTH ACCESS INITIATIVE INCTHE POPULATION COUNCIL INC — $188,552 · InternationalTHE POPULATION COUNCIL INCGARDENS FOR HEALTH INTERNATIONAL — $119,765 · InternationalGARDENS FOR HEALTH INTERNATIONALLIFENET INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION — $114,325 · InternationalLIFENET INTERNATIONAL CORPORATIONMASS DESIGN GROUP LTD — $88,131 · InternationalMASS DESIGN GROUP LTDGlobal Health Council — $82,859 · InternationalGlobal Health CouncilTOGETHER FOR GIRLS — $73,179 · InternationalHEALTH BUILDERS INTERNATIONAL — $72,682 · InternationalPATH — $71,236 · InternationalSPARK MICROGRANTS INC — $67,791 · InternationalDays For Girls International — $48,747 · International+5 more — $121,902 · International+5 morePARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $281,544 · HealthPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROF…ELIZABETH GLASER PEDIATRIC AIDS FOUNDATION — $111,432 · HealthELIZABETH GLASER PEDIATRIC A…INTRAHEALTH INTERNATIONAL INC — $109,373 · HealthINTRAHEALTH INTERNATIONAL IN…Greater Newark Health Care Coalition — $83,992 · HealthGreater Newark Health Care C…GRASSROOTS HEALTH — $82,671 · HealthGRASSROOTS HEALTHPUBLIC HEALTH SOLUTIONS — $65,707 · HealthPUBLIC HEALTH SOLUTIONSTIP Global Health — $65,664 · HealthTIP Global Health+6 more — $147,023 · Health+6 moreBoston Public Health Commission — $125,689 · OtherBoston Public Healt…The Children's Health Fund — $82,162 · OtherThe Children's Heal…CENTER FOR HEALTH AND GENDER EQUITY INC — $75,285 · OtherCENTER FOR HEALTH A…CIDRZ FOUNDATION — $52,438 · OtherCIDRZ FOUNDATIONJHPIEGO CORPORATION — $48,696 · OtherJHPIEGO CORPORATIONINTERAMERICAN DEVELOP BANK — $46,990 · OtherINTERAMERICAN DEVEL…DIGNITAS INTERNATIONAL USA INC — $46,119 · OtherDIGNITAS INTERNATIO…BUSH GLOBAL HEALTH INITIATIVE — $41,709 · OtherBUSH GLOBAL HEALTH …MINISTRY HEALTH CARE INC — $38,340 · OtherMINISTRY HEALTH CAR…william j CLINTON foundation — $29,122 · OtherTHE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NEWARK INC — $44,856 · OtherTHE BOYS & GIRLS CL…+2 more — $27,193 · OtherCOVENANT HOUSE — $182,657 · Human ServicesCOVENANT …HIPS — $82,075 · Human ServicesHIPSFOUNDATION FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & EMPOWERMENT — $52,189 · Human ServicesFOUNDATIO…Emory University — $129,845 · EducationWomen Deliver Inc — $75,285 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $29,609 · EducationHOUSING WORKS INC — $63,167 · Community ImprovementDHMSC REALTY INC — $35,305 · Community ImprovementTHE VECNA CARES CHARITABLE TRUST — $62,908 · PhilanthropyBUILD HEALTH INTERNATIONAL INC — $34,306 · Philanthropy
International$1,396,544Health$947,406Other$658,599Human Services$316,921Education$234,739Community Improvement$98,472Philanthropy$97,214

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCLINTON HEALTH ACCESS INITIATIVE INC — $347,375 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $281,544 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE POPULATION COUNCIL INC — $188,552 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE — $182,657 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetEmory University — $129,845 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGARDENS FOR HEALTH INTERNATIONAL — $119,765 over 3y, 10% of budgetLIFENET INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION — $114,325 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetELIZABETH GLASER PEDIATRIC AIDS FOUNDATION — $111,432 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetINTRAHEALTH INTERNATIONAL INC — $109,373 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMASS DESIGN GROUP LTD — $88,131 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetGreater Newark Health Care Coalition — $83,992 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetGlobal Health Council — $82,859 over 2y, 5.7% of budgetGRASSROOTS HEALTH — $82,671 over 2y, 8.4% of budgetThe Children's Health Fund — $82,162 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetHIPS — $82,075 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetWomen Deliver Inc — $75,285 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCENTER FOR HEALTH AND GENDER EQUITY INC — $75,285 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetTOGETHER FOR GIRLS — $73,179 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetHEALTH BUILDERS INTERNATIONAL — $72,682 over 2y, 6.8% of budgetPATH — $71,236 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSPARK MICROGRANTS INC — $67,791 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetPUBLIC HEALTH SOLUTIONS — $65,707 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTIP Global Health — $65,664 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetHOUSING WORKS INC — $63,167 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE VECNA CARES CHARITABLE TRUST — $62,908 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & EMPOWERMENT — $52,189 over 3y, 11% of budgetDays For Girls International — $48,747 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetJHPIEGO CORPORATION — $48,696 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NEWARK INC — $44,856 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetBUSH GLOBAL HEALTH INITIATIVE — $41,709 over 1y, 8.7% of budgetMINISTRY HEALTH CARE INC — $38,340 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDHMSC REALTY INC — $35,305 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBUILD HEALTH INTERNATIONAL INC — $34,306 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $29,609 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WOMEN'S BAKERY INC — $28,396 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetPOPULATION ACTION INTERNATIONAL — $27,485 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDOTHOUSE HEALTH INC — $27,485 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER — $27,484 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMREF HEALTH AFRICA INC INC (AMREF) — $25,009 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetEVIDENCE ACTION — $23,293 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $22,214 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOTHERS2MOTHERS UNITED STATES INC — $22,025 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE ARCHIVE INSTITUTE A NJ NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $20,836 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetTeam Heart Inc — $20,330 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetCONCERN WORLDWIDE (US) INC — $10,350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNYAKA INC — $6,357 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gates FoundationPathConrad N Hilton Found…Segal Family Foundati…Wellspring Philanthro…The Ford FoundationThe David and Lucile …Globalgiving Foundati…United Nations Founda…Imago Dei FundJsi Research & Traini…Boston Foundation Inc
Gates FoundationWA21.4× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gates Foundation · Path · Conrad N Hilton Foundation · Segal Family Foundation Inc · Wellspring Philanthropic Fund Inc · The Ford Foundation · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · Globalgiving Foundation Inc · United Nations Foundation Inc · Imago Dei Fund · Jsi Research & Training Institute Inc · Boston Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Global Health Corps Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Jhpiego Corporation — 65% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
  • Dothouse Health Inc — 11% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home