· Public charity
Global Down Syndrome Foundation
To significantly improve the lives of people with down syndrome through research, medical care, education and advocacy.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 4 grants below total $729,464 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $789,464 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $60,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k2 grants · $15k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $214k
- $250k+1 grant · $500k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION | $500,000 |
| 5K AND UNDER GRANTS | $214,464 |
| BLACK DOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION | $8,000 |
| GOLD COAST DOWN SYNDROME ORGANIZATI | $7,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $100k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 73% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +76% since the first grant, against +33% for the ones you funded once.
14 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $229k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UOUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION8× · 2017–2025 · $4.4M · revenue +79%
- CHChildren's Hospital Colorado Foundation3× · 2018–2020 · $28k · revenue +37%
- CFCentral Florida Down Syndrome Assoc Inc2× · 2017–2024 · $20k · revenue +54%
Funded once
- HSHELEN SMITH SCHOLARSHIP FUND INCone grant, 2018 · $12k
- DSDOWN SYNDROME PARTNERSHIP OF NORTH TEXASgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $11k · revenue +67%
- ATARC THRIFT STORES INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $11k · revenue +26%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of the organization is to be a local advocate for the value, acceptance and inclusion of people in south central kentucky with down syndrome
A parent support organization dedicated to promoting the rights, dignity and potential of all individuals with down syndrome through advocacy, education, public awareness and support.
To provide information, advocacy and support concerning all aspects of life for individuals with down syndrome, their families, and our community.
Our mission is to build a positive connection between individuals with down syndrome, their families, and eastern idaho. we do this by providing education, advocacy, support, and resources to help facilitate inclusion within the local…
To be a resource and advocacy organization promoting public awareness and supporting lifelong opportunities for individuals with down syndrome and their families.
Providing information and support to individuals with down syndrome along with families, professionals, and the community through educational and social activities.
Enhance the quality of life of individuals with down syndrome by fostering family engagement, encouraging connections and providing information while promoting inclusion, acceptance and awareness of individuals with down syndrome.
1. Provide an understanding of down sysdrome (DS) through the dissemination of information to families, professionals and others interested in DS.2. Provide non-professional services, support and advocacy to individuals with DS and their…
The organization is a subsidiary organization of down syndrome association of wisconsin inc., a 501(c)(3). the mission at the down syndrome association of wisconsin (dsaw) is to provide support to wisconsin families and individuals with…
The Down Syndrome Association of Tallahassee supports individuals with Down Syndromes, their families and caregivers through education, support groups, community awareness and acceptance, conferences and assistance with therapy services.
We empower individuals with down syndrome and their communities through education, resources, outreach and advocacy. we are committed to amplifying our collective voices and broader needs to drive meaningful change.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Down Syndrome Association of Brazos Valley and the most unlike its peers is Hearts2Honduras Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
45 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 45 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Children's Hospital Colorado Foundation ↗
- Who funds Central Florida Down Syndrome Assoc Inc ↗
- Who funds DOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION OF DELAWARE INC ↗
- Who funds DOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION OF NORTHEAST OHIO ↗
- Who funds DOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE ↗
- Who funds DOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION OF GREATER ST LOUIS ↗
- Who funds GRACESIGNS ↗
- Who funds DOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION OF JACKSONVILLE INC ↗
- Who funds INCLUSION CONNECTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds DOWN SYNDROME PARTNERSHIP OF NORTH TEXAS ↗
- Who funds ARC THRIFT STORES INC ↗
- Who funds NORTH CAROLINA DOWN SYNDROME ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds DOWN SYNDROME CONNECTION OF THE BAY AREA ↗
- Who funds Down Syndrome Network of Montgomery County Inc ↗
- Who funds DOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION OF CONNEC ↗
- Who funds The Cedars of Marin ↗
- Who funds GREEN OAKS EDUCATION AND SUPPORT INC ↗
- Who funds LITTLE LEAF LEARNING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds DOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION OF GREATER CINCINNATI ↗
- Who funds DOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
- Who funds VIRGINIA DOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds DOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION FOR FAMILIES ↗
- Who funds Black Down Syndrome Association ↗
- Who funds BUDDY UP FOR LIFE INC ↗
- Who funds DOWN SYNDROME ALABAMA ↗
- Who funds GOLD COAST DOWN SYNDROME ORG INC ↗
- Who funds DOWN SYNDROME INDIANA INC ↗
- Who funds ACDS INC ↗
- Who funds Coastal Bringing up Down Syndrome of Southeastern ↗
- Who funds SHARING DOWN SYNDROME ARIZONA INC ↗
- Who funds DOWN SYNDROME ASSN OF CENTRAL TEXAS ↗
- Who funds DEVELOPMENTAL PATHWAYS INC ↗
- Who funds DOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL NEW JERSEY INC ↗
- Who funds Down Syndrome Guild of Dallas ↗
- Who funds Alaska Chapter Down Syndrome Congress ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Tony R Wells Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · McKesson Foundation Inc · Dollar General Literacy Foundation · Down Syndrome Diagnosis Network · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Network for Good · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Global Down Syndrome Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Down Syndrome Association of Connec — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Global Down Syndrome Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Global Down Syndrome Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.