Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Gladys and Ralph Lazarus Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$232k
Granted FY2020
36
Grants FY2020
10
States reached
$20k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Gladys and Ralph Lazarus Foundation’s FY2023 grant dollars went to Desert Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2023 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2020, the last year Gladys and Ralph Lazarus Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 25 organizations, $232k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

25
18
26
19
25
20
22
21
27
22
0
23

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182023.

Philanthropy$5.7MArts & Culture$239kEducation$227kEnvironment$132kInternational$131kHuman Services$114kYouth Development$46kHealth$28kOther$0
02FY2020 · 36 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k23 grants · $56k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $176k
$5,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE$20,000
SAN ANTONIO AREA FOUNDATION$20,000
DESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$17,000
SAN FRANCISCO OPERA ASSOCIATION$15,000
TEXAS PUBLIC RADIO$15,000
BARSHOP JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER$15,000
STANFORD UNIVERSITY$12,000
DARTMOUTH ALUMNI FUND$12,000
FIND FOOD BANK$10,000
PEACEWORKS NETWORK FOUNDATION$10,000
KEYSTONE SCHOOL$10,000
KQED$10,000
PARTNERS IN HEALTH$10,000
MIZZELL SENIOR CENTER$7,000
MEALS ON WHEELS SF$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–22, $89k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BARSHOP JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $15k → 16%EVERY CHILD'S HOPE: $500 → 11%BARSHOP JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $15k → 16%BARSHOP JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $15k → 16%BARSHOP JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $15k → 16%BARSHOP JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $15k → 16%EDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%EDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%EDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%BROADWAY ADVOCACY COALITION INC: $2k → 17%BROADWAY ADVOCACY COALITION INC: $2k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
NH
IL
NY
OH
CT
CA
NE
MO
VA
MD
NM
KS
DC
OK
AL
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$793k · 30 repeat orgs$157k to everyone else

30 repeat relationships — 23 still active in FY2020, 7 since wound down; 24 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call). Read against FY2020, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
16

Total granted

$793k
$57k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+70%

Still filing today

77%
88%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $51k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22
EducationInternationalHuman ServicesHealthAnimalsArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC
    5× · 2018–2022 · $100k · revenue +37%
  • BJ
    BARSHOP JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN ANTONIO
    5× · 2018–2022 · $75k · revenue +16%
  • KI
    KQED INC
    5× · 2018–2022 · $50k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • AL
    ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUEgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +47%
  • TL
    THE LAKE MOREY FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • Save The Children Federation Inc
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +11%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
2
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

3
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
4
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
5
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
6
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
7
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
8
Golden Gate University

Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…

Education
9
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

10
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

11
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
12
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Peaceworks Network Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Aim High. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsDevelopmental Disabilities …Community Arts OrganizationsCancer Support OrganizationsPublic Library SupportChristian Youth CampsAnimal Rescue and AdoptionWildlife Rehabilitation Cen…Land Conservation Organizat…Legal Aid & Immigration Ser…Independent K-8 SchoolsPublic School District Foun…Food Pantries & AssistancePregnancy Support ServicesYouth Development CentersChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Christian Missionary Organi…Classical Music EnsemblesFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Government Accountability R…Jewish Community Federations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%4%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%7%10–20yr16%28%20–35yr13%32%35–55yr16%26%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%0%10–20yr16%91%20–35yr13%3%35–55yr16%6%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%1/63
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,502

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

61 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 61 of the 75 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
59/61
Grantees still filing
47/61
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SAN ANTONIO AREA FOUNDATION — $1,952,746 · PhilanthropySAN ANTONIO AREA FOUNDATIONDESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $1,918,746 · PhilanthropyDESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $1,772,746 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC+1 more — $2,500 · PhilanthropyTEXAS PUBLIC RADIO — $75,000 · Arts & CultureSAN FRANCISCO OPERA ASSOCIATION — $70,000 · Arts & CultureKQED INC — $50,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $3,000 · Arts & CultureTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $77,000 · EducationEASTSIDE COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC — $26,000 · EducationTrustees of Dartmouth College — $20,000 · EducationWILDWOOD SCHOOL INC — $10,500 · EducationTHE ARMAND HAMMER UNITED WORLD COLLEGE OF THE AMER — $10,250 · EducationKEYSTONE SCHOOL — $10,000 · EducationLAS LOMITAS EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $7,500 · EducationBROOKLYN PUBLIC LIBRARY — $6,250 · Education+1 more — $2,500 · EducationDARTMOUTH ALUMNI FUND — $42,000 · OtherPBS SOCAL — $17,000 · OtherKCRW — $16,000 · OtherTHE PEACEWORKS NETWORK FOUNDATION — $30,000 · OtherMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $16,000 · OtherJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF OKI PARTNERS — $15,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF VENICE — $45,000 · OtherPOPULATION CONNECTION — $22,000 · OtherOMAHA ZOO FOUNDATION — $15,000 · Other+36 more — $157,600 · OtherNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $100,000 · EnvironmentAmerican Forests — $20,000 · Environment+1 more — $2,500 · EnvironmentBARSHOP JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN ANTONIO — $75,000 · Human ServicesEDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATION — $10,500 · Human ServicesAIM HIGH — $5,000 · Human Services+2 more — $3,500 · Human ServicesPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $40,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $27,000 · HealthACKNOWLEDGE ALLIANCE — $16,500 · Health+2 more — $900 · Health
Philanthropy$5,646,738Arts & Culture$198,000Education$170,000Other$375,600Environment$122,500Human Services$94,000Health$84,400

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSAN ANTONIO AREA FOUNDATION — $1,952,746 over 6y, 2.6% of budgetDESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $1,918,746 over 6y, 17% of budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $1,772,746 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $100,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $77,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS PUBLIC RADIO — $75,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetBARSHOP JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN ANTONIO — $75,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO OPERA ASSOCIATION — $70,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetKQED INC — $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF VENICE — $45,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $40,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PEACEWORKS NETWORK FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $27,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetEASTSIDE COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC — $26,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPOPULATION CONNECTION — $22,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTrustees of Dartmouth College — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Forests — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetACKNOWLEDGE ALLIANCE — $16,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $16,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF OKI PARTNERS — $15,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetOMAHA ZOO FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAFRICARE — $12,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATE OF ORANGE COUNTY — $12,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetEDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATION — $10,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWILDWOOD SCHOOL INC — $10,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ARMAND HAMMER UNITED WORLD COLLEGE OF THE AMER — $10,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKEYSTONE SCHOOL — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGRACE — $10,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetFOOD IN NEED OF DISTRIBUTION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC — $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBROOKLYN PUBLIC LIBRARY — $6,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAIM HIGH — $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE VINTAGE CLUB — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBROADWAY ADVOCACY COALITION INC — $3,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSOCIETY FOR MARTIAL ARTS INSTRUCTION INC — $3,000 over 1y, 9.2% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum — $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJANE GOODALL INSTITUTE FOR WILDLIFE RESEARCH EDUCATION AND CONSERVATION — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIODESIGN CHALLENGE INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWILDAID INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFIRST AMENDMENT COALITION — $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL WORKING GROUP — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCRISTOSAL INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTOMORROW'S WOMEN — $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Albuquerque Community FoundationNM13.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Albuquerque Community Foundation · San Antonio Area Foundation · Open Society Institute · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The San Francisco Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Tides Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Shell USA Company Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Gladys and Ralph Lazarus Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc30% of income from government
  • Feed the Children Inc1% of income from government
  • Sandy Hook Promise Foundation0% of income from government
  • Farm and Wilderness Foundation Inc0% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Gladys and Ralph Lazarus Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Gladys and Ralph Lazarus Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 75 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph