· Public charity
The Country Friends
The organization's sole purpose is to raise money to support human care agencies with emphasis on those providing services to women, children, and the elderly for the purpose of helping people to help themselves.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 23 grants below total $247,793 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $302,793 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $55,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k5 grants · $35k
- $10k–50k18 grants · $213k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WALDEN FAMILY SERVICES | $18,000 |
| PROMISES 2 KIDS | $15,000 |
| VOICE FOR OUR CITY CHOIR | $15,000 |
| GIRLS RISING | $15,000 |
| RISE UP INDUSTRIES | $14,130 |
| BE A FRIEND-IMPACT A LIFE | $12,400 |
| RITECARE CHILDHOOD LANGUAGE | $12,000 |
| ARMED SERVICES YMCA | $11,763 |
| EMILIO NARES | $10,000 |
| MITCHELL THORP FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| OLIVE WOOD GARDENS & LEARNING | $10,000 |
| GENERATE HOPE | $10,000 |
| SOCIAL ADVOCATES FOR YOUTH | $10,000 |
| A STEP BEYOND | $10,000 |
| COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $346k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against +33% for the ones you funded once.
56 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 43 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $109k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- VHVISTA HILL FOUNDATION6× · 2018–2025 · $51k · revenue +24%
- CDCasa De Amparo5× · 2018–2022 · $37k · revenue +43%
- MTMitchell Thorp Foundation5× · 2018–2025 · $32k · revenue +445%
Funded once
- MRMAYA RELIEF FOUNDATIONone grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue -91%
- LCLA COLONIA DE EDEN GARDENS INCone grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue +10%
- RFREFUGE FOR WOMEN SOCALone grant, 2021 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Dreams for Change's mission is to respond to the needs of San Diegans by creating innovative and cost-effective programs to empower and stabilize the lives of under-served families and individuals.
The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.
To spark breakthrough community action that elevates every child and family toward a brighter future.
The purpose of providing legal representation and advocacy to foster children and youth in the San Diego County courts.
The mission of san diego volunteer lawyer program, inc. is to provide equal access to the justice system by serving as a bridge between indigent and other disadvantaged people in san diego county and the volunteer lawyers who are willing…
Promote Access to Health Care for all San Diegans
Jewish family service is a client-centered, impact-driven organization working to build a stronger, healthier, more resilient san diego.
Acquire, manage and protect land in perpetuity that supports sensitive habitats and species, and to educate and inspire people and communities as stewards and advocates of their natural environment.
Hannahs Family Center envisions a world where strong families enable children to thrive and communities to prosper. Since 1993, we have helped San Diego families navigate significant adverse changes, trauma and loss. As experts in…
Founded in 2012, urban street angels is a san diego native 501(c)3 attentive to supporting homeless youth through supportive housing, peer support, mentorship, mental health counseling, and job training initiatives, in order to develop a…
San diego kind corporation, a ca non profit organization, creates and develops housing and services for the low income elderly and also contributes to other low income senior service and housing projects.
To increase, preserve and improve quality affordable housing opportunities for working families.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Elderhelp of San Diego and the most unlike its peers is Maya Relief Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
97 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 97 of the 106 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds VISTA HILL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WOMENS RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds Casa De Amparo ↗
- Who funds GENERATEHOPE INC ↗
- Who funds Mitchell Thorp Foundation ↗
- Who funds GREATER LA JOLLA MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗
- Who funds REALITY CHANGERS ↗
- Who funds HELEN WOODWARD ANIMAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds PROMISES2KIDS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Rise Up Industries ↗
- Who funds SAN DIEGO RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds KITCHENS FOR GOOD ↗
- Who funds MAYA RELIEF FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS ↗
- Who funds SAN DIEGO BLOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA SCOTTISH RITE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds A Step Beyond ↗
- Who funds WALDEN ENVIRONMENT DBA WALDEN FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds Think Dignity ↗
- Who funds OLIVEWOODS GARDENS & LEARNING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds PALOMAR HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds VOICES OF OUR CITY CHOIR INC ↗
- Who funds LA COLONIA DE EDEN GARDENS INC ↗
- Who funds The Vision of Children ↗
- Who funds PROJECT CONCERN INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds PALOMAR FAMILY COUNSELING SERVICE INC ↗
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SAN DIEGO INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY CAMPERSHIP COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds YWCA OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY ↗
- Who funds SOLUTIONS FOR CHANGE INC ↗
- Who funds SUPPORT THE ENLISTED PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds SOCIAL ADVOCATES FOR YOUTH SAN DIEGO INC ↗
- Who funds LUCKY DUCK FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MIRACLE BABIES ↗
- Who funds WARRIORS LIVE ON ↗
- Who funds ARMED SERVICES YMCA OF THE USA ↗
- Who funds Emilio Nares Foundation ↗
- Who funds CONNECTMED INTERNATIONAL ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The San Diego Foundation · David C Copley Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · Rancho Santa Fe Foundation · The Cushman Foundation · Price Philanthropies Foundation · The Conrad Prebys Foundation · Pratt Memorial Fund · Walter J & Betty C Zable Foundation · The Nordson Corporation Foundation · Sempra Foundation · The Parker Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Country Friends funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.