Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Private foundation

Alliance Healthcare Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$9.4M
Granted FY2025still arriving
86
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$7.5M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Health$21MHuman Services$4.1MYouth Development$1.3MFood & Nutrition$1.3MCommunity Improvement$1.2MPhilanthropy$593kScience & Tech$557kHousing & Shelter$536kOther$0
02FY2025 · 86 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k32 grants · $116k
  • $10k–50k45 grants · $1.2M
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $630k
  • $250k+1 grant · $7.5M
$25,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$82M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
IMPERIAL VALLEY WELLNESS FUND$7,500,000
URBAN RESTORATION COUNSELING CENTER$170,000
PROMISES2KIDS FOUNDATION$105,000
CASA FAMILIAR$75,000
CATALYST OF SAN DIEGO & IMPERIAL COUNTIES$75,000
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO - LIVE WELL ADVANCE$55,396
UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO$50,000
SAN DIEGO ORGANIZING PROJECT$50,000
YOUTH EMPOWERMENTS FINEST$50,000
MUNDO GARDENS$40,000
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE$40,000
GLOBAL POLICY LEADERSHIP ACADEMY$35,000
YOUTH EMPOWERMENTS FINEST$30,000
REALITY CHANGERS$30,000
NORTH COUNTY LGBTQ RESOURCE CENTER$30,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $2.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CHICANO FEDERATION OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY: $25k → 11%CHICANO FEDERATION OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY: $25k → 11%CHICANO FEDERATION OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY: $25k → 11%SOMALI FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN DIEGO: $495k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF SAN DIEGO: $40k → 11%NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE ASSOCIATION: $100k → 11%NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE ASSOCIATION: $50k → 11%NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE ASSOCIATION: $25k → 11%NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE ASSOCIATION: $25k → 11%BAYSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER: $25k → 11%NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE ASSOCIATION: $25k → 11%CASA FAMILIAR: $75k → 11%NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE ASSOCIATION: $25k → 11%CASA FAMILIAR: $50k → 11%BAYSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER: $25k → 11%CASA FAMILIAR: $50k → 11%NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE ASSOCIATION: $25k → 11%CASA FAMILIAR: $30k → 11%CASA FAMILIAR: $30k → 11%SAN DIEGO OASIS: $25k → 11%PILLARS OF THE COMMUNITY: $25k → 11%MAAC PROJECT: $25k → 11%MAAC PROJECT: $25k → 11%ICF CENTER FOR CROSS BORDER PHILANTHROPY DBA OLIVEWOOD GARDENS AND LEARNING: $34k → 11%IMPERIAL BEACH NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $35k → 11%OCEANSIDE HOMELESS RESOURCE: $25k → 11%HARMONIUM: $25k → 11%HARMONIUM: $25k → 11%LICENSE TO FREEDOM: $50k → 11%LICENSE TO FREEDOM: $30k → 11%LICENSE TO FREEDOM: $30k → 11%LICENSE TO FREEDOM: $30k → 11%RISE UP INDUSTRIES: $25k → 11%RISE UP INDUSTRIES: $25k → 11%RISE UP INDUSTRIES: $25k → 11%NORTH COUNTY LIFELINE INC: $25k → 11%NORTH COUNTY LIFELINE INC: $25k → 11%SOMALI FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN DIEGO: $25k → 11%SERVING SENIORS: $25k → 11%SERVING SENIORS: $25k → 11%SERVING SENIORS: $25k → 11%SOMALI FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN DIEGO: $115k → 11%SOMALI FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN DIEGO: $90k → 11%SOMALI FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN DIEGO: $50k → 11%YMCA OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY DBA JACKIE ROBINSON FAMILY YMCA: $51k → 11%ELDERHELP OF SAN DIEGO: $34k → 11%GENERATEHOPE: $50k → 11%NILE SISTERS DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVE: $50k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MI
NY
NJ
CA
CO
HI
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 37% of Alliance Healthcare Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in CA; read by stated purpose it is 63% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Alliance Healthcare Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

57%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$15M · 82 repeat orgs$11M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.

82 repeat relationships — 42 still active in FY2025, 40 since wound down; 23 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

82
104

Total granted

$15M
$3.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+13%

Still filing today

83%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 17% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7.8M went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthCommunity ImprovementEducationYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UR
    Urban Restoration Counselling
    4× · 2022–2025 · $1.0M · revenue +203% · 51% of their budget
  • PN
    PROJECT NEW VILLAGE
    4× · 2019–2024 · $932k · revenue +413% · 69% of their budget
  • SF
    SOMALI FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN DIEGO
    5× · 2019–2023 · $850k · revenue +414% · 38% of their budget

Funded once

  • VI
    VIZER INC
    one grant, 2020 · $500k
  • MH
    MULTICULTURAL HEALTHCARE
    one grant, 2019 · $400k
  • SD
    SAN DIEGO HEALTHCARE QUALITY COLLABORATIVE (WELLNESS SAN DIEGO)
    one grant, 2019 · $323k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Design Forward Alliance

Advocating for Human-Centered Design as a regional approach to improve economic, social, and civic life in our community.Design Forward Alliance is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit dedicated to leveraging the power of design to drive social impact.…

Community Improvement
2
San Diego Regional Economic Development Foundation

To support and cultivate sustainable employment opportunities for San Diego County residents contributing to a prosperous local economy.

Community Improvement
3
San Diego Community Housing Corporation

To increase, preserve and improve quality affordable housing opportunities for working families.

Housing & Shelter
4
Community Information Exchange
Health
5
New Door Opportunities

Feeding the homeless population in san d

Food & Nutrition
6
Institute for Public Strategies

Institute of Public Strategies (IPS) is a nonprofit corporation that receives its funding from local and federal governmental agencies and private foundations, through long-term grants or contracts to provide community-level services…

Health
7
Urban League of San Diego County

Assist African Americans and other underserved people in San Diego County to acheive social and economic equality through advocacy, bridge building, program services and research.

—
8
The San Diego Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender Community Center

The san diego lgbt community center enhances and sustains the health & well-being of the lesbian, gay, bisexual, queer, transgender, nonbinary, immigrant, and hiv communities to the betterment of our entire san diego region.

Health
9
Imperial Beach Community Clinic

Operate clinics to providing primary healthcare to people of all ages in imperial beach and surrounding communities and southwest San Diego county place emphasis on patient satisfaction in a sensitive environment.

—
10
Consejo Counseling & Referral Service

Consejo brings healing, health, and hope to communities through holistic, culturally, and linguistically competent behavioral health services and advocacy.

Health
11
Instituto Familiar De La Raza

Instituto provides hiv related services and social service including health promotion, education, prevention, early intervention, case management and clinical and artistic mentoring services, psychological and psychiatric interventions as…

—
12
San Diego Hunger Coalition

San diego hunger coalition works collaboratively with community partners to create equitable access to food assistance through research, education, and advocacy.

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is San Diego Youth Services and the most unlike its peers is The Conrad Prebys Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadySan Diego Community SupportAffordable Housing Developm…Labor UnionsFaith-Based International M…Regional Business ChambersSan Diego Community Foundat…Residential Community Assoc…Biomedical Research Institu…Union Employee Health TrustsFamily Philanthropic Founda…Fraternal & Community Assoc…Performing & Visual Arts Or…Youth Sports LeaguesCommunity Health CentersRiver & Environmental Conse…Disability & Senior Support…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number25%1%<5yr16%18%5–10yr21%25%10–20yr16%25%20–35yr10%16%35–55yr12%14%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value25%1%<5yr16%16%5–10yr21%29%10–20yr16%26%20–35yr10%17%35–55yr12%12%55yr+

The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%2/162
the rest of the field
15%
2,127/14,599

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

154 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 154 of the 214 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

7
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
42
Early backer (in before they grew)
149/154
Grantees still filing
98/154
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

IMPERIAL VALLEY WELLNESS FUND — $7,500,000 · OtherIMPERIAL VALLEY WELLNESS FUNDCOUNTY OF SAN DIEGO - LIVE WELL ADVANCE — $546,856 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE — $520,400 · OtherVIZER INC — $500,000 · Other+103 more — $5,442,860 · Other+103 moreImperial Valley Wellness Foundation — $1,671,474 · HealthImperial Valley Wel…Urban Restoration Counselling — $1,031,000 · HealthUrban Restoration C…SAN DIEGO HEALTHCARE QUALITY COLLABORATIVE — $565,000 · HealthSAN DIEGO HEALTHCAR…MULTICULTURAL HEALTH FOUNDATION — $415,000 · HealthMULTICULTURAL HEALT…ALLIANCE HEALTH CLINIC INC — $211,098 · Health+18 more — $523,730 · Health+18 moreSOMALI FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN DIEGO — $849,999 · Human ServicesSOMALI FAMILY …INFO LINE OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY — $560,000 · Human ServicesINFO LINE OF S…NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE ASSN — $275,000 · Human ServicesNEIGHBORHOOD H…CASA FAMILIAR INC — $246,000 · Human ServicesCASA FAMILIAR …LICENSE TO FREEDOM — $147,000 · Human ServicesSERVING SENIORS — $125,000 · Human ServicesCHICANO FEDERATION OF SAN DIEGO — $115,000 · Human Services+30 more — $1,090,729 · Human Services+30 moreCatalyst of San Diego & Imperial Counties — $650,500 · PhilanthropyTHE SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION — $337,500 · Philanthropy+5 more — $107,000 · PhilanthropyPROJECT NEW VILLAGE — $932,098 · Food & NutritionMEALS-ON-WHEELS GREATER SAN DIEGO INC — $60,000 · Food & Nutrition+6 more — $100,743 · Food & NutritionJUST IN TIME FOR FOSTER YOUTH — $279,065 · Youth DevelopmentYOUTH EMPOWERMENTS FINEST — $216,000 · Youth DevelopmentCesar Chavez Service Clubs Inc — $151,298 · Youth DevelopmentACCESS YOUTH ACADEMY — $75,000 · Youth DevelopmentMENDING MATTERS — $60,000 · Youth DevelopmentRainbow Spaces — $50,000 · Youth Development+2 more — $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentMONARCH SCHOOL PROJECT — $181,100 · EducationREALITY CHANGERS — $165,000 · EducationMANA DE SAN DIEGO — $100,000 · EducationFIRST GEN SCHOLARS — $55,000 · EducationBARRIO LOGAN COLLEGE INSTITUTE — $50,000 · EducationHANNAHS FAMILY CENTER — $34,065 · EducationACCE Institute — $34,065 · EducationtranscenDANCE Youth Arts Project — $25,000 · Education+2 more — $23,000 · Education
Other$14,510,116Health$4,417,302Human Services$3,408,728Philanthropy$1,095,000Food & Nutrition$1,092,841Youth Development$851,363Education$667,230

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetImperial Valley Wellness Foundation — $1,671,474 over 6y, 93% of budgetUrban Restoration Counselling — $1,031,000 over 4y, 51% of budgetPROJECT NEW VILLAGE — $932,098 over 4y, 69% of budgetSOMALI FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN DIEGO — $849,999 over 5y, 38% of budgetCatalyst of San Diego & Imperial Counties — $650,500 over 7y, 5.6% of budgetSAN DIEGO HEALTHCARE QUALITY COLLABORATIVE — $565,000 over 4y, 31% of budgetINFO LINE OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY — $560,000 over 6y, 3.0% of budgetMULTICULTURAL HEALTH FOUNDATION — $415,000 over 2y, 22% of budgetTHE SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION — $337,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetJUST IN TIME FOR FOSTER YOUTH — $279,065 over 7y, 2.6% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE ASSN — $275,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCASA FAMILIAR INC — $246,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetYOUTH EMPOWERMENTS FINEST — $216,000 over 4y, 6.2% of budgetALLIANCE HEALTH CLINIC INC — $211,098 over 5y, 17% of budgetMONARCH SCHOOL PROJECT — $181,100 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetInterfaith Community Services Inc — $174,100 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetPROMISES2KIDS FOUNDATION — $165,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetREALITY CHANGERS — $165,000 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetCesar Chavez Service Clubs Inc — $151,298 over 5y, 9.5% of budgetINTERFAITH SHELTER NETWORK OF SAN DIEGO — $151,003 over 4y, 6.6% of budgetHOME START INC — $150,400 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetLICENSE TO FREEDOM — $147,000 over 6y, 12% of budgetNorth County LGBTQ Resource Center — $145,000 over 5y, 3.1% of budgetKITCHENS FOR GOOD — $140,065 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SAN MARCOS — $140,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetSAN DIEGO COUNTY MEDICAL SOCIETY FOUNDATION DBA CHAMPIONS FOR HEALTH — $125,000 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetSERVING SENIORS — $125,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetSAN DIEGO RESCUE MISSION INC — $125,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFREE TO THRIVE — $124,065 over 4y, 4.4% of budgetCHICANO FEDERATION OF SAN DIEGO — $115,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetPAVING GREAT FUTURES — $107,000 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetUnited Women of East Africa Support Team — $100,000 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetMANA DE SAN DIEGO — $100,000 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetWORKFORCE VENTURES — $100,000 over 1y, 31% of budgetCENTER FOR EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES INC — $90,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEnvironmental Health Coalition — $89,065 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetNORTH COUNTY LIFELINE INC DBA LIFELINE COMMUNITY SERVICES — $79,240 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $76,098 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetURBAN CORPS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY — $75,205 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetRise Up Industries — $75,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetSAN DIEGO AMERICAN INDIAN HEALTH CENTER — $75,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetMID-CITY COMMUNITY ADVOCACY NETWORK — $75,000 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetACCESS YOUTH ACADEMY — $75,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetSomali Bantu Association of America — $75,000 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetMetropolitan Area Advisory Committee on Anti-Poverty of San Diego County Inc — $73,784 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYMCA OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY — $71,098 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetA Reason To Survive — $70,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO — $70,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Imperial Valley Wellness Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Urban Restoration Counselling ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT NEW VILLAGE ↗
  • Who funds SOMALI FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN DIEGO ↗
  • Who funds Catalyst of San Diego & Imperial Counties ↗
  • Who funds SAN DIEGO HEALTHCARE QUALITY COLLABORATIVE ↗
  • Who funds INFO LINE OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds MULTICULTURAL HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JUST IN TIME FOR FOSTER YOUTH ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE ASSN ↗
  • Who funds CASA FAMILIAR INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH EMPOWERMENTS FINEST ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE HEALTH CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds MONARCH SCHOOL PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds Interfaith Community Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds PROMISES2KIDS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds REALITY CHANGERS ↗
  • Who funds Cesar Chavez Service Clubs Inc ↗
  • Who funds INTERFAITH SHELTER NETWORK OF SAN DIEGO ↗
  • Who funds HOME START INC ↗
  • Who funds LICENSE TO FREEDOM ↗
  • Who funds North County LGBTQ Resource Center ↗
  • Who funds KITCHENS FOR GOOD ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SAN MARCOS ↗
  • Who funds SAN DIEGO COUNTY MEDICAL SOCIETY FOUNDATION DBA CHAMPIONS FOR HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds SERVING SENIORS ↗
  • Who funds SAN DIEGO RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds FREE TO THRIVE ↗
  • Who funds CHICANO FEDERATION OF SAN DIEGO ↗
  • Who funds PAVING GREAT FUTURES ↗
  • Who funds United Women of East Africa Support Team ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Price Philanthropies …The San Diego Foundat…The Conrad Prebys Fou…Jewish Community Foun…David C Copley Founda…The Parker FoundationCatalyst of San Diego…Rancho Santa Fe Found…Leichtag FoundationThe Cushman FoundationWalter J & Betty C Za…The Nordson Corporati…
Price Philanthropies FoundationCA138.4× affinity70 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Price Philanthropies Foundation · The San Diego Foundation · The Conrad Prebys Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · David C Copley Foundation · The Parker Foundation · Catalyst of San Diego & Imperial Counties · Rancho Santa Fe Foundation · Leichtag Foundation · The Cushman Foundation · Walter J & Betty C Zable Foundation · The Nordson Corporation Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Alliance Healthcare Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    63report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 214 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home