Skip to content
George H Campbell Lillian S Campbell And at a glance

· Private foundation

George H Campbell Lillian S Campbell And

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$733k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$215k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$3.2MPhilanthropy$2.0MReligion$615kHousing & Shelter$405kHealth$165kArts & Culture$155kCrime & Legal$60kCommunity Improvement$40kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $165k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $555k
$25,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LUTHERAN SENIORLIFE FOUNDATION$215,000
CONCORDIA LUTHERAN MINISTRIES$180,000
PRESBYTERIAN SENIOR CARE NETWORK$60,000
CARNEGIE INSTITUTE$50,000
LIGHT OF LIFE MINISTRIES INC$50,000
SHEPHERDS HEART FELLOWSHIP$25,000
ST EDMUNDS ACADEMY$25,000
KIDSVOICE$25,000
ASBURY FOUNDATION$20,000
BAPTIST HOMES FOUNDATION$20,000
FIRST LUTHERAN CHURCH$20,000
WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA VNA$15,000
LUTHERAN SERVICE SOCIETY OF WESTERN$15,000
RANKIN CHRISTIAN CENTER$7,500
SERVING OUR SENIORS$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WASHINGTON CITY MISSION: $15k → 12%SERVING OUR SENIORS: $5k → 11%PRESBYTERIAN SENIOR CARE NETWORK: $70k → 11%PRESBYTERIAN SENIOR CARE NETWORK: $60k → 11%PRESBYTERIAN SENIOR CARE NETWORK: $60k → 11%PRESBYTERIAN SENIOR CARE NETWORK: $50k → 11%PRESBYTERIAN SENIOR CARE NETWORK: $25k → 11%PRESBYTERIAN SENIOR CARE NETWORK: $20k → 11%LIGHT OF LIFE MINISTRIES INC: $50k → 11%LIGHT OF LIFE MINISTRIES INC: $50k → 11%LIGHT OF LIFE MINISTRIES INC: $50k → 11%PASSAVANT RETIREMENT & HEALTH CTR: $140k → 9%LIGHT OF LIFE MINISTRIES INC: $50k → 11%LIGHT OF LIFE MINISTRIES INC: $25k → 11%Light of Life Ministries Inc: $25k → 11%LIGHT OF LIFE MINISTRIES INC: $25k → 11%LIGHT OF LIFE MINISTRIES INC: $25k → 11%Light of Life Ministries Inc: $20k → 11%BAPTIST HOMES FOUNDATION: $50k → 11%BAPTIST HOMES FOUNDATION: $50k → 11%BAPTIST HOMES FOUNDATION: $50k → 11%BAPTIST HOMES FOUNDATION: $50k → 11%BAPTIST HOMES FOUNDATION: $50k → 11%BAPTIST HOMES FOUNDATION: $20k → 11%RANKIN CHRISTIAN CENTER: $20k → 11%RANKIN CHRISTIAN CENTER: $15k → 11%RANKIN CHRISTIAN CENTER: $10k → 11%Kidsvoice Pennsylvania Inc: $15k → 11%RANKIN CHRISTIAN CENTER: $10k → 11%RANKIN CHRISTIAN CENTER: $8k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.0M · 17 repeat orgs$660k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
17

Total granted

$6.0M
$560k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+4%
+25%

Still filing today

82%
59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthArts & CulturePhilanthropyHousing & ShelterCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CL
    CONCORDIA LUTHERAN MINISTRIES
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +190%
  • LO
    LIGHT OF LIFE MINISTRIES INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $320k · revenue +85%
  • PS
    Presbyterian SeniorCare
    6× · 2020–2025 · $285k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • VS
    VILLA ST JOSEPH OF BADEN INC
    one grant, 2017 · $150k · revenue -99%
  • PR
    PASSAVANT RETIREMENT AND HEALTH CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $140k · revenue +30%
  • EL
    EAST LIBERTY FAMILY HEALTH CARE CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $50k · revenue +93%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Presbyterian Medical Center of Washington Pennsylvania Inc

An esteemed short-stay & long-term skilled nursing facility with rehabilitation, dementia & hospice services that serves persons of all incomes & is committed to excellence & person-centered care.

—
2
Presbyterian Medical Center of Oakmont Pennsylvania Inc

An esteemed short-stay & long-term skilled nursing facility with rehabilitation, dementia & hospice services that serves persons of all incomes & is committed to excellence & person-centered care.

Health
3
Longwood at Oakmont Inc

Continuing care retirement community providing a full range of quality amenities & support including an accredited LifeCare model that provides priority access to future healthcare services.

Human Services
4
Saint Joseph Villa

The mission of saint joseph villa is rooted in the mission of the sisters of st. joseph who founded and sponsor the villa. the sisters' mission of uniting people with god and with one another is the primary focus of the staff at the villa.…

—
5
Presbyterian Homes in the Presbytery of Lake Erie

To be a compassionate, inclusive faith-inspired network of communities and services committed to enhancing the quality of life of older adults.Presbyterian Homes is a part of the Presbyterian SeniorCare network of facilities.

—
6
Wrc Pennsylvania Memorial Home

Wrc pennsylvania memorial home's mission is to provide choices for generations. built on a not-for-profit foundation of caring, the organization offers residential and personal care, home and community-based services, skilled and…

Health
7
Vincentian Home

Vincentian home is part of the larger vincentian collaborative system ministries, whose mission statement is: "compelled by the love of christ, vincentian collaborative system nurtures and sustains a ministry of compassionate care that…

Health
8
Luthercare

"luthercare reflects christ's love through service to others." our mission is to enhance the quality of life through creative senior living opportunities, family life through quality child care and early learning centers, appropriate…

Human Services
9
Living Independence for the Elderly

Life pittsburgh offers an alternative to nursing home placement for frail, indigent residents of allegheny county. we manage the acute and chronic medical needs of our enrollees, as well as, provide a social environment to combat the…

Human Services
10
Concordia Lutheran Ministries of Pittsburgh

Concordia Lutheran Ministries of Pittsburgh strives to serve our aging community with a continuum of high quality care-giving options, provided in a Christian environment, and to serve those with limited funds to the best of our ability.…

Housing & Shelter
11
Marian Manor Corporation

Marian manor is part of the larger vincentian collaborative system ministries, whose mission statement is: "compelled by the love of christ, vincentian collaborative system nurtures and sustains a ministry of compassionate care that…

Health
12
Vincentian Collaborative System Charitable Foundation

Compelled by the love of christ, vincentian charitable foundation nurtures and sustains a ministry of compassionate care that preserves the human dignity of persons within a diverse and changing society. vcf exists to be a catalyst for…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lutheran Seniorlife Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Little Sisters of the Poor. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/28
Grantees still filing
16/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST JOHN LUTHERAN CARE CENTER: $625,000 · OtherST JOHN LUTHERAN CARE CENTERSHEPHERDS HEART FELLOWSHIP: $570,000 · OtherSHEPHERDS HEART FELLOWSHIPSISTERS OF ST FRANCIS NEUMANN COMMUNITY: $180,000 · OtherSISTERS OF ST FRANCIS NEUMANN COMMU…VILLA ST JOSEPH OF BADEN INC: $150,000 · OtherVILLA ST JOSEPH OF BADEN INCTHE COMMUNITY AT HOLY FAMILY MANOR: $125,000 · OtherTHE COMMUNITY AT HOLY FAMILY MANOREPISCOPAL DIOCESE OF PITTSBURGH: $110,000 · Other+17 more: $315,000 · Other+17 moreLUTHERAN SENIORLIFE FOUNDATION: $1,956,797 · PhilanthropyLUTHERAN SENIORLIFE FOUNDATIONCONCORDIA LUTHERAN MINISTRIES: $1,055,000 · HealthCONCORDIA LUTHERAN M…ST MARGARET FOUNDATION: $100,000 · HealthST MARGARET FOUNDATI…EAST LIBERTY FAMILY HEALTH CARE CENTER INC: $50,000 · HealthLIGHT OF LIFE MINISTRIES INC: $320,000 · Human ServicesLIGHT OF LIFE MINI…Presbyterian SeniorCare: $285,000 · Human ServicesPresbyterian Senio…BAPTIST HOMES FOUNDATION: $270,000 · Human ServicesBAPTIST HOMES FOUN…PASSAVANT RETIREMENT AND HEALTH CENTER: $140,000 · Human ServicesPASSAVANT RETIREME…RANKIN CHRISTIAN CENTER: $62,500 · Human ServicesRANKIN CHRISTIAN C…+3 more: $35,000 · Human ServicesVIECARE BUTLER LLC: $145,000 · Housing & ShelterCARNEGIE INSTITUTE: $135,000 · Arts & CultureHISTORICAL SOCIETY OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA: $10,000 · Arts & CultureKIDSVOICE: $45,000 · Crime & LegalWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA CONSERVANCY: $15,000 · Environment
Other$2,075,000Philanthropy$1,956,797Health$1,205,000Human Services$1,112,500Housing & Shelter$145,000Arts & Culture$145,000Crime & Legal$45,000Environment$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLUTHERAN SENIORLIFE FOUNDATION: $1,956,797 over 9y, 39% of budgetCONCORDIA LUTHERAN MINISTRIES: $1,055,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetST JOHN LUTHERAN CARE CENTER: $625,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetLIGHT OF LIFE MINISTRIES INC: $320,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetPresbyterian SeniorCare: $285,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetBAPTIST HOMES FOUNDATION: $270,000 over 6y, 4.7% of budgetVILLA ST JOSEPH OF BADEN INC: $150,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetVIECARE BUTLER LLC: $145,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetPASSAVANT RETIREMENT AND HEALTH CENTER: $140,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCARNEGIE INSTITUTE: $135,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY AT HOLY FAMILY MANOR: $125,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetST MARGARET FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetRANKIN CHRISTIAN CENTER: $62,500 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetEAST LIBERTY FAMILY HEALTH CARE CENTER INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $45,000 over 2y, 48% of budgetKIDSVOICE: $45,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetTHE FORBES FUNDS: $40,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetST EDMUND'S ACADEMY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCENTER FOR HEARING & DEAF SERVICES INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA CONSERVANCY: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON CITY MISSION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetKIDSVOICE PENNSYLVANIA INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHISTORICAL SOCIETY OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetELIZABETH SETON CENTER INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetVINCENTIAN COLLABORATIVE SYSTEM: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetANCHORPOINT COUNSELING MINISTRY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSERVING OUR SENIORS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pittsburgh Founda…Hillman Family Founda…The United Way of Sou…McKinney Charitable F…Snee-Reinhardt Charit…Eden Hall FoundationThe Jack Buncher Foun…Richard King Mellon F…Howard & Nell E Mille…John R McCune Dec'D C…Centimark FoundationAj and Sigismunda Pal…
The Pittsburgh FoundationPA28.8× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pittsburgh Foundation · Hillman Family Foundations · The United Way of Southwestern Pennsylvania · McKinney Charitable Foundation · Snee-Reinhardt Charitable Foundation · Eden Hall Foundation · The Jack Buncher Foundation · Richard King Mellon Foundation · Howard & Nell E Miller Foundat · John R McCune Dec'D Charitable · Centimark Foundation · Aj and Sigismunda Palumbo Charitable Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization George H Campbell Lillian S Campbell And funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from George H Campbell Lillian S Campbell And. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to George H Campbell Lillian S Campbell And?

    Find your warmest path to George H Campbell Lillian S Campbell And through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on George H Campbell Lillian S Campbell And’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home