· Private foundation
George H Campbell Lillian S Campbell And
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k2 grants · $13k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $165k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $555k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LUTHERAN SENIORLIFE FOUNDATION | $215,000 |
| CONCORDIA LUTHERAN MINISTRIES | $180,000 |
| PRESBYTERIAN SENIOR CARE NETWORK | $60,000 |
| LIGHT OF LIFE MINISTRIES INC | $50,000 |
| CARNEGIE INSTITUTE | $50,000 |
| SHEPHERDS HEART FELLOWSHIP | $25,000 |
| ST EDMUNDS ACADEMY | $25,000 |
| KIDSVOICE | $25,000 |
| ASBURY FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| BAPTIST HOMES FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| FIRST LUTHERAN CHURCH | $20,000 |
| WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA VNA | $15,000 |
| LUTHERAN SERVICE SOCIETY OF WESTERN | $15,000 |
| RANKIN CHRISTIAN CENTER | $7,500 |
| SERVING OUR SENIORS | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
17 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CLCONCORDIA LUTHERAN MINISTRIES9× · 2017–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +190%
- LOLIGHT OF LIFE MINISTRIES INC9× · 2017–2025 · $320k · revenue +85%
- PSPresbyterian SeniorCare6× · 2020–2025 · $285k · revenue +32%
Funded once
- VSVILLA ST JOSEPH OF BADEN INCone grant, 2017 · $150k · revenue -99%
- PRPASSAVANT RETIREMENT AND HEALTH CENTERgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $140k · revenue +30%
- ELEAST LIBERTY FAMILY HEALTH CARE CENTER INCgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $50k · revenue +93%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
An esteemed short-stay & long-term skilled nursing facility with rehabilitation, dementia & hospice services that serves persons of all incomes & is committed to excellence & person-centered care.
An esteemed short-stay & long-term skilled nursing facility with rehabilitation, dementia & hospice services that serves persons of all incomes & is committed to excellence & person-centered care.
Continuing care retirement community providing a full range of quality amenities & support including an accredited LifeCare model that provides priority access to future healthcare services.
The mission of saint joseph villa is rooted in the mission of the sisters of st. joseph who founded and sponsor the villa. the sisters' mission of uniting people with god and with one another is the primary focus of the staff at the villa.…
To be a compassionate, inclusive faith-inspired network of communities and services committed to enhancing the quality of life of older adults.Presbyterian Homes is a part of the Presbyterian SeniorCare network of facilities.
Wrc pennsylvania memorial home's mission is to provide choices for generations. built on a not-for-profit foundation of caring, the organization offers residential and personal care, home and community-based services, skilled and…
Vincentian home is part of the larger vincentian collaborative system ministries, whose mission statement is: "compelled by the love of christ, vincentian collaborative system nurtures and sustains a ministry of compassionate care that…
"luthercare reflects christ's love through service to others." our mission is to enhance the quality of life through creative senior living opportunities, family life through quality child care and early learning centers, appropriate…
Life pittsburgh offers an alternative to nursing home placement for frail, indigent residents of allegheny county. we manage the acute and chronic medical needs of our enrollees, as well as, provide a social environment to combat the…
Concordia Lutheran Ministries of Pittsburgh strives to serve our aging community with a continuum of high quality care-giving options, provided in a Christian environment, and to serve those with limited funds to the best of our ability.…
Marian manor is part of the larger vincentian collaborative system ministries, whose mission statement is: "compelled by the love of christ, vincentian collaborative system nurtures and sustains a ministry of compassionate care that…
Compelled by the love of christ, vincentian charitable foundation nurtures and sustains a ministry of compassionate care that preserves the human dignity of persons within a diverse and changing society. vcf exists to be a catalyst for…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lutheran Seniorlife Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Little Sisters of the Poor. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 44 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 16% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LUTHERAN SENIORLIFE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CONCORDIA LUTHERAN MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds ST JOHN LUTHERAN CARE CENTER ↗
- Who funds LIGHT OF LIFE MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds Presbyterian SeniorCare ↗
- Who funds BAPTIST HOMES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds VILLA ST JOSEPH OF BADEN INC ↗
- Who funds VIECARE BUTLER LLC ↗
- Who funds PASSAVANT RETIREMENT AND HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds CARNEGIE INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds THE COMMUNITY AT HOLY FAMILY MANOR ↗
- Who funds ST MARGARET FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds RANKIN CHRISTIAN CENTER ↗
- Who funds EAST LIBERTY FAMILY HEALTH CARE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR ↗
- Who funds KIDSVOICE ↗
- Who funds THE FORBES FUNDS ↗
- Who funds ST EDMUND'S ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds ASBURY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON CITY MISSION ↗
- Who funds KIDSVOICE PENNSYLVANIA INC ↗
- Who funds WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR HEARING & DEAF SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds VINCENTIAN COLLABORATIVE SYSTEM ↗
- Who funds HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds ELIZABETH SETON CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds SERVING OUR SENIORS INC ↗
- Who funds ANCHORPOINT COUNSELING MINISTRY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Pittsburgh Foundation · Hillman Family Foundations · The United Way of Southwestern Pennsylvania · McKinney Charitable Foundation · Snee-Reinhardt Charitable Foundation · Eden Hall Foundation · The Jack Buncher Foundation · Richard King Mellon Foundation · Howard & Nell E Miller Foundat · John R McCune Dec'D Charitable · Centimark Foundation · Aj and Sigismunda Palumbo Charitable Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization George H Campbell Lillian S Campbell And funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to George H Campbell Lillian S Campbell And?
Find your warmest path to George H Campbell Lillian S Campbell And through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.