Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Fresno Area Workforce Investment Corporation

To oversee the optimal administration of workforce innovation and opportunity act (wioa) funds in fresno county.

$18M
Granted FY2025still arriving
29
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$3.5M
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 75% of FRESNO AREA WORKFORCE INVESTMENT CORPORATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 29 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 29 grants below total $10,960,507 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $18,431,109 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $7,470,602 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $204k
  • $50k–250k11 grants · $1.8M
  • $250k+9 grants · $9.0M
$135,094
Median grant
4
States reached
$5.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
APM EQUUS HOLDINGS CORP$3,527,417
CENTRAL LABOR COUNCIL PTRSHP$1,853,997
FRESNO COUNTY EOC$1,165,608
AMERICA WORKS OF CALIFORNIA$859,666
PROTEUS INC$363,734
YOSEMITE COMMUNITY COLLEGE DI$351,227
KERN INYO & MONO COUNTIES$293,365
MOTHER LODE JOB TRAINING$287,044
VALLEY ROP$275,584
COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN$249,440
SAN JOAQUIN BUILDING & CONST$248,461
COUNTY OF KERN$242,324
CENTRO LA FAMILIA ADVOCACY SE$240,727
STATE CENTER COMMUNITY COLLEG$156,175
JOINT ELECTRICAL INDUSTRY TRA$135,094
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $9.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%VALLEY ONWARD: $40k → 19%VALLEY ONWARD: $28k → 19%FRESNO COUNTY EOC: $1.2M → 19%FRESNO COUNTY EOC: $1.2M → 19%FRESNO COUNTY EOC: $1.1M → 19%FRESNO COUNTY EOC: $1.1M → 19%FRESNO COUNTY EOC: $1.1M → 19%FRESNO COUNTY EOC: $1.0M → 19%FRESNO COUNTY EOC: $994k → 19%FRESNO COUNTY EOC: $920k → 19%FRESNO COUNTY EOC: $906k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$70M · 30 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

30 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
6

Total granted

$70M
$160k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+67%

Still filing today

37%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $947k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EmploymentHuman ServicesEducationCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    AMERICAN FEDERATION OF LABOR & CONGRESS OF INDUSTRIAL ORG
    9× · 2017–2025 · $20M · revenue +177%
  • FC
    Fresno County Economic Opportunities Commission
    9× · 2017–2025 · $9.4M · revenue +49%
  • KM
    KERNINYO & MONO COUNTIES BCTC AFL-CIO BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION
    4× · 2022–2025 · $828k · revenue +110% · 60% of their budget

Funded once

  • CB
    CSU BAKERSFIELD AUXILIARY FOR SPONSORED PROGRAMS ADMINISTRATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue +67%
  • TW
    THE WATER SCHOOL
    one grant, 2018 · $34k
  • MV
    MOUNTAIN VIEW ELEMENTARY
    one grant, 2017 · $32k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Building and Protecting Californias Future

Part III, Q1 To Further awareness of jobs, education and training.

2
California Workforce Association

To promote, enhance and serve the interests of local workforce development partnerships.

3
Saew-Lmcc Industry Labor Management Cooperation Trust

To represent promote & enhance the management interest of it's electrical contractor mbrs through labor relations,education, management skills improvement,apprentice & journeyman training, marketing, service, public relations,

Employment
4
California Alliance for Jobs

To actively participate in the enhancement and development of unionized construction work in the Northern California area, and to promote public awareness of the importance of construction as an economic factor in the continued growth and…

5
Central Valley Partnership

The Central Valley Partnership (CVP) conducts and collaborates in training initiatives, including community organizer training, education on labor history and issues, messaging workshops, etc., aimed at fostering the establishment of new…

Civil Rights
6
California State Council of Service Employees

The council coordinated the efforts of affiliated local unions and assisted their organizations work, bettering the working conditions of their members.

7
Santa Clara and San Benito Counties Building and Construction Trades Council

The btc is instrumental in promoting union jobs, union labor and apprenticeship programs within the communities where they work and throughout the construction industry as a whole.

8
Water Education for Latino Leaders

Well educates and trains local latino elected officials about california water policy to promote timely and equitable actions that serve to develop a robust economy, healthy communities, and a resilient environment for all californians.

Human Services
9
California Employers Association

Provide all member employers with current human resource and California labor law information.

10
San Joaquin and Calaveras Counties Electrical Training and Educational Trust

To provide a program for the education of apprentices and supplemental education of journeymen in the electrical industry.

Education
11
Construction Trades Workforce Initiative

We support economic justice by connecting underrepresented communities to union construction careers.

Education
12
Southern California Contractors Association

To promote and represent union contractors, inform them about issues affecting the industry and provide the members with support services and peer networks that will help them to succeed.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fresno County Economic Opportunities Commission and the most unlike its peers is American Federation of Labor & Congress of Industrial Org. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
11/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

AMERICAN FEDERATION OF LABOR & CONGRESS OF INDUSTRIAL ORG — $20,206,428 · OtherAMERICAN FEDERATION OF LABOR & CONGRESS OF INDUSTRIAL ORGEquus Workforce Services — $7,779,553 · OtherEquus Workforce ServicesAPM EQUUS HOLDINGS CORP — $7,022,394 · OtherAPM EQUUS HOLDINGS CORPEQUUS WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS — $5,229,340 · OtherEQUUS WORKFORCE SOLUTIONSWEST HILLS COMMUNITY COLLEGE — $4,433,532 · OtherWEST HILLS COMMUNITY COLLEGE+28 more — $8,012,760 · Other+28 moreFresno County Economic Opportunities Commission — $9,395,225 · Human ServicesFresno County E…+1 more — $67,705 · Human ServicesProteus Inc — $7,435,963 · EmploymentProteus Inc+3 more — $200,142 · EmploymentCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY FRESNO FOUNDATION — $408,876 · EducationCSU BAKERSFIELD AUXILIARY FOR SPONSORED PROGRAMS ADMINISTRATION — $50,000 · EducationTradeswomen Incorporated — $368,506 · Community ImprovementCALIFORNIA MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY CONSULTING — $50,000 · Community ImprovementREADING AND BEYOND — $5,101 · Youth Development
Other$52,684,007Human Services$9,462,930Employment$7,636,105Education$458,876Community Improvement$418,506Youth Development$5,101

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFresno County Economic Opportunities Commission — $9,395,225 over 9y, 1.0% of budgetProteus Inc — $7,435,963 over 9y, 4.4% of budgetKERNINYO & MONO COUNTIES BCTC AFL-CIO BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION — $827,758 over 4y, 60% of budgetAMER FED OF LABOR & SAN JOAQUIN BLDG CONSTR TRADES — $588,288 over 5y, 25% of budgetCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY FRESNO FOUNDATION — $408,876 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTradeswomen Incorporated — $368,506 over 4y, 12% of budgetJOINT ELECTRICAL INDUSTRY TRAINING FUND — $135,094 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetASSOCIATED CALIFORNIA LOGGERS — $90,054 over 4y, 7.4% of budgetValley Onward — $67,705 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetMadera County Workforce Investment Corporation — $59,431 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetCALIFORNIA MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY CONSULTING — $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCSU BAKERSFIELD AUXILIARY FOR SPONSORED PROGRAMS ADMINISTRATION — $50,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetFRESNO BUSINESS COUNCIL — $14,273 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetCENTER FOR EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES INC — $5,617 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREADING AND BEYOND — $5,101 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN FEDERATION OF LABOR & CONGRESS OF INDUSTRIAL ORG
  • Who funds Fresno County Economic Opportunities Commission
  • Who funds Proteus Inc
  • Who funds KERNINYO & MONO COUNTIES BCTC AFL-CIO BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION
  • Who funds AMER FED OF LABOR & SAN JOAQUIN BLDG CONSTR TRADES
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY FRESNO FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Tradeswomen Incorporated
  • Who funds Centro La Familia Advocacy Services INC
  • Who funds JOINT ELECTRICAL INDUSTRY TRAINING FUND
  • Who funds PIPE TRADES DISTRICT COUNCIL #36 APPRENTICE TRAINING FUND
  • Who funds ASSOCIATED CALIFORNIA LOGGERS
  • Who funds Valley Onward
  • Who funds Madera County Workforce Investment Corporation
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY CONSULTING
  • Who funds CSU BAKERSFIELD AUXILIARY FOR SPONSORED PROGRAMS ADMINISTRATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Foundation for California Community CollegesCA29.8× affinity12 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Foundation for California Community Colleges · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Public Health Institute · California Fire Safe Council Inc · The California Endowment · California Humanities · Sierra Health Foundation Center for Health Program Management · Best Friends Animal Society · Jobs for the Future Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Fresno Area Workforce Investment Corporation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph