Skip to content
Fremont Bank Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Fremont Bank Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.4M
Granted FY2025still arriving
88
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$6.2MEducation$2.8MHuman Services$1.1MFood & Nutrition$1.0MAnimals$821kReligion$778kYouth Development$710kScience & Tech$585kOther$0
02FY2025 · 88 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k47 grants · $230k
  • $10k–50k25 grants · $448k
  • $50k–250k13 grants · $961k
  • $250k+3 grants · $810k
$7,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$14M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Washington Hospital Foundation$300,000
Abode Housing Develpoment$260,000
City of Fremont$250,000
Mission Action$150,000
Moreau Catholic High School$150,000
Tri-City Economic Development Corp$100,000
Hayward Unified School District$75,000
Dominican Sisters of Mission San Jo$72,215
La Familia$62,100
SOSMeals on Wheels$52,000
Chabot Space and Science Center$50,000
Alameda Health System Foundation$50,000
Serra Residential Center Inc$50,000
Silicon Valley Education Foundation$50,000
Stanford University School of Medic$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $964k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%Trinity Center Walnut Creek: $15k → 9%Gateway Center of Monterey County I: $5k → 12%Trinity Center Walnut Creek: $5k → 9%Sacred Heart Community Services: $20k → 8%Martha's Kitchen: $10k → 8%Trinity Center Walnut Creek: $5k → 9%Martha's Kitchen: $5k → 8%Martha's Kitchen: $5k → 8%Martha's Kitchen: $5k → 8%Martha's Kitchen: $5k → 8%Trinity Center Walnut Creek: $5k → 9%Martha's Kitchen: $5k → 8%Martha's Kitchen: $5k → 8%Martha's Kitchen: $5k → 8%Davis Street Community Center: $10k → 10%Sacred Heart Community Services: $5k → 8%Davis Street Community Center: $10k → 10%California Community Opportunities: $25k → 8%Youth Homes: $25k → 9%Community Services Agency: $20k → 8%Community Services Agency: $8k → 8%Community Services Agency: $8k → 8%Village Community Resource Center: $11k → 9%City Serve of the Tri-Valley: $12k → 10%Cardea Health: $30k → 10%Deaf Plus Adult Community: $20k → 10%Deaf Plus Adult Community: $20k → 10%Kidango Inc: $100k → 10%LIFE ElderCare: $20k → 10%Safe Alternatives to Violent Enviro: $10k → 10%LIFE ElderCare: $10k → 10%Kidango Inc: $10k → 10%Kidango: $10k → 10%Safe Alternatives to Violent Enviro: $9k → 10%Kidango Inc: $8k → 10%Tri-City Volunteers: $20k → 10%Tri-City Volunteers: $8k → 10%Spectrum Community Services Inc: $20k → 10%Spectrum Community Services Inc: $20k → 10%Spectrum Community Services Inc: $20k → 10%Spectrum Community Services Inc: $20k → 10%Spectrum Community Services Inc: $18k → 10%Spectrum Community Services Inc: $6k → 10%Mercy Retirement Care Center: $22k → 10%Mercy Retirement Care Center: $15k → 10%Mercy Retirement Care Center: $10k → 10%Mercy Retirement Care Center: $8k → 10%Mercy Retirement Care Center: $8k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 9% of Fremont Bank Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 92%.

Fremont Bank Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$16M · 146 repeat orgs$2.2M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +55% since the first grant, against +1% for those funded once.

146 repeat relationships: 60 still active in FY2025, 86 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

146
93

Total granted

$16M
$1.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%
+1%

Still filing today

60%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $615k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationHousing & ShelterArts & CultureFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WH
    WASHINGTON HOSPITAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $3.4M · revenue +83% · 29% of their budget
  • CS
    CONSERVATION SOCIETY OF CALIFORNIA
    5× · 2017–2023 · $785k · revenue +39%
  • OC
    OHLONE COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    3× · 2017–2019 · $635k · revenue +93% · 71% of their budget

Funded once

  • TV
    Tiburcio Vaszquez Health Center
    one grant, 2023 · $235k
  • AXIS COMMUNITY HEALTH INC
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +16%
  • GH
    Greater Hayward Area Recreation and
    one grant, 2020 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bay Area Community Services Housing Corp

Improve the quality of life for individuals in Alameda County, Contra Costa County, Solano County, Monterey County, Sacramento County and the surrounding area in the State of California.

Housing & Shelter
2
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
3
Silicon Valley Independent Living Center

SVILC builds disability identity, culture, pride, creating opportunities for personal and community transformation, and partnering with others to ensure that civil and human rights are protected.

Human Services
4
Regional Center of the East Bay Inc

Regional Center of the East Bay, Inc. (The "Center"), a California NonProfit Public Benefit Corporation under contract with the state of California Department of Developmental Services ("DDS"), was formed in 1975 to administer programs for…

Human Services
5
Alameda County Homeless Action Center

HAC assists homeless and mentally ill clients in the long and difficult process of becoming eligible for SSI and MediCal benefits. HAC provides assistance with other public benefits that clients need in the interim to survive until their…

Housing & Shelter
6
Alzheimers Services of the East Bay

The mission of Alzheimer's Services of the East Bay is to provide services to individuals with Alzheimer's disease and other related dementia; provide support for their caregivers; and educate and inform the general community about issues…

Health
7
Alameda Emergency Food Dba Alameda Food Bank

Founded in 1977, The Alameda Food Bank is a non-profit organization that helps Alameda residents in need by providing nourishing food in compassionate and respectful manner with the support of dedicated volunteers and local partners.

Food & Nutrition
8
California Donor Table

California Donor Table anchors a hub of donors, foundations, and community leaders. We pool together our resources to shape California into a truly democratic state that works for the people, not the powerful. Rooted in our commitment to…

Civil Rights
9
Ala Costa Centers a Program for Developmentally Disabled

To provide each student or participant with the access, skills, and opportunities needed to become successful and productive members of society, and to encourage them to have some fun along the way. The Organization offers support and…

—
10
San Francisco Casa

San Francisco CASA transforms the lives of children and youth traumatized and displaced in the foster care and related systems by providing one consistent, caring volunteer advocate, trained to address each childs needs in the court and…

Civil Rights
11
Equity Health

Our mission is to ensure health care access to quality comprehensive health care services for persons who are medically needy or medically under-served and have traditionally experienced difficulty in getting care from traditional sources.

—
12
Children's Council of San Francisco

By advocating for quality early care and education, empowering families with information and financial support, and building the capabilities of educators, Children's Council of San Francisco ensures that every child in San Francisco has…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Gateway Center of Monterey County Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

154 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 154 of the 260 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
51
Early backer (in before they grew)
146/154
Grantees still filing
101/154
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OHLONE COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $635,200 · OtherOHLONE COLLEGE FOUNDATIONDominican Sisters of Mission San Jo: $572,215 · OtherDominican Sisters of Mission San JoSAN LEANDRO BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB INC: $475,000 · OtherSAN LEANDRO BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB INCCITY OF FREMONT: $317,500 · OtherMOREAU CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL: $300,000 · OtherCHABOT SPACE & SCIENCE CENTER FOUNDATION: $605,000 · OtherCHABOT SPACE & SCIENCE CENTER FOUNDATIONSilicon Valley Community Foundation: $400,000 · Other+133 more: $5,189,325 · Other+133 moreWASHINGTON HOSPITAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $3,425,000 · HealthWASHINGTON HOSPITAL HEALTHCARE FOUN…ST ROSE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $1,310,000 · HealthST ROSE HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONTIBURCIO VASQUEZ HEALTH CENTER INC: $416,000 · HealthTIBURCIO VASQUEZ HEALTH CENTER INCALAMEDA HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION: $317,000 · HealthALAMEDA HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION+7 more: $376,000 · Health+7 morePRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE: $500,000 · EducationCAL STATE EAST BAY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $320,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $50,000 · EducationTHE LEGACY FUNDS OF HOLY NAMES UNIVERSITY: $50,000 · Education+5 more: $101,520 · EducationKidango Inc: $127,500 · Human ServicesSPECTRUM COMMUNITY SERVICES: $103,255 · Human ServicesMERCY RETIREMENT AND CARE CENTER: $79,500 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW LOS ALTOS AND LOS ALTOS HILLS INC: $72,500 · Human ServicesTRI-CITY VOLUNTEERS INC: $67,500 · Human ServicesTRINITY CENTER WALNUT CREEK: $60,000 · Human ServicesMARTHA'S KITCHEN: $55,000 · Human ServicesSACRED HEART COMMUNITY SERVICE: $45,000 · Human ServicesDeaf Plus Adult Community Inc: $40,470 · Human ServicesThe Davis Street Community Center Inc: $40,000 · Human ServicesSOCIETY OF STVINCENT DE PAUL District Council of Alameda County: $35,000 · Human Services+14 more: $224,570 · Human ServicesCONSERVATION SOCIETY OF CALIFORNIA: $785,000 · Animals+1 more: $25,300 · AnimalsABODE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT: $260,000 · Housing & ShelterMISSION ACTION INC: $175,000 · Housing & ShelterABODE SERVICES: $139,500 · Housing & ShelterGLAD TIDINGS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: $70,000 · Housing & ShelterEAST BAY INNOVATIONS INC: $70,000 · Housing & ShelterRUBY'S PLACE INC: $51,500 · Housing & Shelter+1 more: $25,000 · Housing & ShelterOPEN HEART KITCHEN OF LIVERMORE INC: $554,300 · Food & NutritionProject Open Hand: $60,000 · Food & NutritionMEALS ON WHEELS OF THE MONTEREY PENINSULA INC: $52,500 · Food & NutritionHopes Corner Inc: $32,500 · Food & Nutrition+2 more: $29,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$8,494,240Health$5,844,000Education$1,021,520Human Services$950,295Animals$810,300Housing & Shelter$791,000Food & Nutrition$728,300

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWASHINGTON HOSPITAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $3,425,000 over 9y, 29% of budgetST ROSE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $1,310,000 over 4y, 39% of budgetCONSERVATION SOCIETY OF CALIFORNIA: $785,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetOHLONE COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $635,200 over 3y, 71% of budgetCHABOT SPACE & SCIENCE CENTER FOUNDATION: $605,000 over 4y, 3.9% of budgetOPEN HEART KITCHEN OF LIVERMORE INC: $554,300 over 9y, 4.7% of budgetPRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE: $500,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSAN LEANDRO BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB INC: $475,000 over 3y, 5.4% of budgetTIBURCIO VASQUEZ HEALTH CENTER INC: $416,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetSilicon Valley Community Foundation: $400,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAL STATE EAST BAY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $320,000 over 4y, 9.0% of budgetALAMEDA HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION: $317,000 over 3y, 5.8% of budgetSILICON VALLEY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $260,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetTri-Valley Haven For Women: $220,000 over 9y, 2.2% of budgetREGIONAL PARKS FOUNDATION: $180,500 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetMISSION ACTION INC: $175,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetABODE SERVICES: $139,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBAY AREA COMMUNITY HEALTH: $130,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetKidango Inc: $127,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetHERS BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION: $115,000 over 9y, 3.9% of budgetSPECTRUM COMMUNITY SERVICES: $103,255 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetLOS ALTOS MOUNTAIN VIEW COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetAXIS COMMUNITY HEALTH INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetROOTS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $100,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPartners Fore Golf Inc The First Tee Tri-Valley: $80,000 over 3y, 4.7% of budgetMERCY RETIREMENT AND CARE CENTER: $79,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSerra Residential Center Inc: $77,055 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetCOMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW LOS ALTOS AND LOS ALTOS HILLS INC: $72,500 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetGLAD TIDINGS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: $70,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetEAST BAY INNOVATIONS INC: $70,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetTRI-CITY VOLUNTEERS INC: $67,500 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetBAY PHILHARMONIC: $60,000 over 4y, 7.2% of budgetProject Open Hand: $60,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetOakland Childrens Fairyland Inc: $60,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetTRINITY CENTER WALNUT CREEK: $60,000 over 9y, 1.7% of budgetMARTHA'S KITCHEN: $55,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetLoaves and Fishes of Contra Costa: $55,000 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF THE MONTEREY PENINSULA INC: $52,500 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetRUBY'S PLACE INC: $51,500 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetTHE LEGACY FUNDS OF HOLY NAMES UNIVERSITY: $50,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSACRED HEART COMMUNITY SERVICE: $45,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR MONTEREY COUNTY: $45,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetKRISTI YAMAGUCHI'S ALWAYS DREAM: $45,000 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetDeaf Plus Adult Community Inc: $40,470 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetThe Davis Street Community Center Inc: $40,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetGeorge Mark Childrens Fund: $37,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSOCIETY OF STVINCENT DE PAUL District Council of Alameda County: $35,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetHopes Corner Inc: $32,500 over 6y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WASHINGTON HOSPITAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ST ROSE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CONSERVATION SOCIETY OF CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds OHLONE COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHABOT SPACE & SCIENCE CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OPEN HEART KITCHEN OF LIVERMORE INC ↗
  • Who funds PRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds SAN LEANDRO BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds TIBURCIO VASQUEZ HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Silicon Valley Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CAL STATE EAST BAY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ALAMEDA HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SILICON VALLEY EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ABODE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ↗
  • Who funds Tri-Valley Haven For Women ↗
  • Who funds REGIONAL PARKS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MISSION ACTION INC ↗
  • Who funds ABODE SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds BAY AREA COMMUNITY HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds Kidango Inc ↗
  • Who funds HERS BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SPECTRUM COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds LOS ALTOS MOUNTAIN VIEW COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AXIS COMMUNITY HEALTH INC ↗
  • Who funds Tri-City Economic Development Corp ↗
  • Who funds ROOTS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Partners Fore Golf Inc The First Tee Tri-Valley ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

East Bay Community Fo…Kaiser Foundation Hos…Alameda County Commun…Sunlight GivingUnited Way of the Bay…Lowell Berry Foundati…Sutter Bay HospitalsThe San Francisco Fou…The Sobrato Family Fo…San Jose Mercury News…Hedco FoundationStupski Foundation
East Bay Community FoundationCA75× affinity57 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: East Bay Community Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Alameda County Community Food Bank · Sunlight Giving · United Way of the Bay Area · Lowell Berry Foundation · Sutter Bay Hospitals · The San Francisco Foundation · The Sobrato Family Foundation · San Jose Mercury News Wish Book Fund Inc · Hedco Foundation · Stupski Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Fremont Bank Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fremont Bank Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    44report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Fremont Bank Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Fremont Bank Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 260 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Fremont Bank’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home