Skip to content

· Private foundation

Freeman R Johnson Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$40k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$82kHuman Services$77kArts & Culture$44kYouth Development$25kPublic Safety & Disaster$20kEducation$16kCommunity Improvement$15kCrime & Legal$14kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,750
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
REGIONAL HEALTH & WELFARE$3,750
PRO MUSICA$3,000
GEORGE A SPIVA CENTER FOR THE ARTS$2,500
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES$2,500
LIFE CHOICES$2,500
AMERICAN RED CROSS OF SW MO$2,500
FREEMAN HEALTH$2,500
HIGHER POWER GARAGE$2,500
ECONOMIC SECURITY CORPORATION$2,500
MERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION$2,000
JOPLIN ASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND$1,750
CHILDREN'S HAVEN OF SW MO$1,750
Individual grant recipient$1,600
CONNECT2CULTURE$1,500
CREATIVE LEARNING ALLIANCE$1,250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%YOUTH VOLUNTEER CORPS: $1k → 15%YOUTH VOLUNTEER CORPS JOPLIN: $1k → 15%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $3k → 15%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $2k → 15%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $2k → 15%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $2k → 15%JOPLIN FAMILY YMCA: $2k → 15%JOPLIN FAMILY YMCA: $2k → 15%JOPLIN FAMILY YMCA: $2k → 15%JOPLIN FAMILY YMCA: $2k → 15%JOPLIN FAMILY YMCA: $2k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$291k · 28 repeat orgs$35k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +27% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

28 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
8

Total granted

$291k
$19k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
0%

Still filing today

64%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCrime & LegalHealthArts & CultureEducationEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FS
    FAMILY SELF HELP CENTER INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $29k · revenue +0%
  • GA
    GEORGE A SPIVA CENTER FOR THE ARTS
    4× · 2022–2025 · $18k · revenue +307%
  • JA
    JOPLIN ASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND
    6× · 2020–2025 · $15k · revenue ×42 · 80% of their budget

Funded once

  • TC
    THE COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC OF SW MO
    one grant, 2020 · $8k
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF JOPLIN
    one grant, 2024 · $4k · revenue 0%
  • TS
    THE SALVATION ARMY JOPLIN
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Joplin Area Chamber of Commerce

To improve the economic prosperity and quality of life in the joplin region, and to be the principal advocate for, and provider of services to its business community

—
2
Main Street Joplin

Main street joplin, d/b/a downtown joplin alliance, is a not-for-profit corporation founded to enhance the economic development of the downtown business district of joplin, mo.

Community Improvement
3
Mercy Health Southwest Missourikansas Communities

As the sisters of mercy before us, we bring to life the healing ministry of jesus through our compassionate care and exceptional service.

—
4
Jewish Community Center

The st. louis jewish community center enriches lives, builds community, promotes inclusivity and creates meaningful jewish experiences.

Human Services
5
Jefferson County Library Cooperative Inc

Coordinate and / or provide services for member libraries to improve library access and services throughout jefferson county

Education
6
Mercy Hospital Joplin

As the sisters of mercy before us, we bring to life the healing ministry of jesus through our compassionate care and exceptional service.

Health
7
Crosslines Churches of the Joplin Area

The organization provides emergency services that improve the overall health and welfare of very low and low income individuals and families in the joplin, carl junction, and webb city areas.

Human Services
8
Missouri Jobs With Justice Voter Action

To develop and advocate for legislation, regulations, ballot initiatives, and government programs as a voice of the working class, to promote social justice, and to stimulate the economy; and, to conduct research, educate the public, and…

Civil Rights
9
Missouri Jobs With Justice

Educate the community on workers' rights

Employment
10
Joplin Humane Society Inc

To promote the humane care and protection of all animals, especially those abandoned, neglected and abused; and to prevent cruelty and suffering of all animals.

Animals
11
Junior League of Kansas City Missouri

The junior league of kansas city, missouri (jlkcmo) is a 501(c)(3) organziation of women whose mission is to advance women's leadership for meaningful community impact through volunteer action, collaboration, and training.

Community Improvement
12
Joplin Business and Industrial Development Corporation

Development of jobs in the joplin, mo area

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mercy Health Foundation Joplin; the most unlike its peers is Higher Power Garage. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/25
Grantees still filing
16/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FAMILY SELF HELP CENTER INC: $29,400 · OtherFAMILY SELF HELP CENTER INCCOMMUNITY CLINIC: $23,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY CLINICCHILDREN'S HAVEN OF SW MO: $18,250 · OtherCHILDREN'S HAVEN OF SW MOPRO MUSICA: $15,000 · OtherPRO MUSICAJOPLIN ASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND: $14,850 · OtherJOPLIN ASSOCIATION FOR THE BLINDBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SW MISSOURI: $14,500 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SW MISSOURIMERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION JOPLIN: $14,000 · OtherMERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION JOPLINREGIONAL HEALTH AND WELFARE: $13,750 · OtherREGIONAL HEALTH AND WELFAREIndividual grant recipient: $8,800 · OtherTHE COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC OF SW MO: $8,000 · Other+25 more: $66,008 · Other+25 moreGEORGE A SPIVA CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $17,500 · Arts & CultureGEORGE A …Connect2Culture: $11,000 · Arts & CultureConnect2C…JOPLIN FAMILY Y: $10,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $8,000 · Human ServicesYouth Volunteer Corps: $2,000 · Human ServicesLIFECHOICES: $11,500 · HealthASCENT RECOVERY RESIDENCES INC: $5,500 · HealthJASPER COUNTY CASA: $14,050 · Crime & LegalRAPHA HOUSE INTERNATIONAL INC: $2,000 · Crime & LegalWILDCAT GLADES NATURE GROUP: $11,975 · EnvironmentHIGHER POWER GARAGE: $7,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$225,558Arts & Culture$28,500Human Services$20,000Health$17,000Crime & Legal$16,050Environment$11,975Public Safety & Disaster$7,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFAMILY SELF HELP CENTER INC: $29,400 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetGEORGE A SPIVA CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $17,500 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetPRO MUSICA: $15,000 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetJOPLIN ASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND: $14,850 over 6y, 80% of budgetJASPER COUNTY CASA: $14,050 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetMERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION JOPLIN: $14,000 over 5y, 4.7% of budgetREGIONAL HEALTH AND WELFARE: $13,750 over 5y, 8.2% of budgetWILDCAT GLADES NATURE GROUP: $11,975 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetLIFECHOICES: $11,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetConnect2Culture: $11,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetJOPLIN FAMILY Y: $10,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHIGHER POWER GARAGE: $7,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetJOPLIN NALA: $7,000 over 2y, 5.7% of budgetASCENT RECOVERY RESIDENCES INC: $5,500 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF JOPLIN: $3,730 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOZARK TRAILS COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA #306: $3,550 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRAPHA HOUSE INTERNATIONAL INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYouth Volunteer Corps: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMISSOURI SOUTHERN FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetJOPLIN TRAILS COALITION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetHOME MEDICAL EQUIPMENT SERVICES: $1,000 over 1y, 12% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FAMILY SELF HELP CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds GEORGE A SPIVA CENTER FOR THE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds PRO MUSICA ↗
  • Who funds JOPLIN ASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND ↗
  • Who funds JASPER COUNTY CASA ↗
  • Who funds MERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION JOPLIN ↗
  • Who funds REGIONAL HEALTH AND WELFARE ↗
  • Who funds WILDCAT GLADES NATURE GROUP ↗
  • Who funds LIFECHOICES ↗
  • Who funds Connect2Culture ↗
  • Who funds JOPLIN FAMILY Y ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds HIGHER POWER GARAGE ↗
  • Who funds JOPLIN NALA ↗
  • Who funds ASCENT RECOVERY RESIDENCES INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF JOPLIN ↗
  • Who funds OZARK TRAILS COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA #306 ↗
  • Who funds RAPHA HOUSE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Youth Volunteer Corps ↗
  • Who funds MISSOURI SOUTHERN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Creative Learning Alliance Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jean Jack and Mildred Lemons Charitable TrustWI47.5× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jean Jack and Mildred Lemons Charitable Trust · W R Corley Memorial Trust CO SMB Trust Services · Fredrick G and Rebekah B Hughes Charitable · Cragin Joy Spiva Charitable Trust · Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc · Arvest Foundation · Cloyd a Carlin Charitable Trust · The Bramlage and Willcoxon Foundation · The United Way of Southwest Missouri · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Freeman Health System · Curchin Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Freeman R Johnson Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Freeman R Johnson Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Freeman R Johnson Trust?

    Find your warmest path to Freeman R Johnson Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Freeman R Johnson’s filings →

    More from the funding graph