· Private foundation
Fred L Emerson Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k49 grants · $188k
- $10k–50k25 grants · $528k
- $50k–250k12 grants · $1.4M
- $250k+1 grant · $421k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SCHWEINFURTH MEMORIAL ART CENTER | $421,200 |
| SEWARD HOUSE MUSEUM | $224,868 |
| CAYUGA CO EMERSON PARK | $201,000 |
| THE REV THEATRE COMPANY | $150,000 |
| BEREA COLLEGE | $150,000 |
| CAYUGA MUSEUM OF HISTORY AND ART | $128,800 |
| THE UPSTATE FOUNDATION | $125,000 |
| HAMILTON COLLEGE | $100,000 |
| FINGER LAKES SPCA OF CNY | $80,000 |
| AUBURN PUBLIC THEATER | $50,000 |
| AUBURN YMCA-WEIU | $50,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF CAYUGA COUNTY | $50,000 |
| NICK'S RIDE 4 FRIENDS INC | $50,000 |
| CAYUGA CO EMERSON PARK | $45,000 |
| E JOHN GAVRAS CENTER | $44,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $720k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against +24% for the ones you funded once.
156 repeat relationships — 52 still active in FY2024, 104 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $144k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SHSeward House Museum7× · 2018–2024 · $6.8M · revenue +261% · 49% of their budget
- MPMERRY-GO-ROUND PLAYHOUSE INC3× · 2017–2019 · $1.1M · revenue +18%
- KCKEUKA COLLEGE3× · 2018–2020 · $1.0M · revenue +1%
Funded once
- MUMARIST UNIVERSITYgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $268k · revenue +31%
- EJE J G FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2017 · $150k · revenue +16% · 86% of their budget
- EUEXCELSIOR UNIVERSITYone grant, 2022 · $140k · revenue +21%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.
St. francis college is an independent, coeducational institution of higher education chartered by an act of the regents of the university of the state of new york on april 10, 1957.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Saint anselm is a catholic, benedictine college providing all of its students a distinctive liberal arts education that incorporates opportunities for professional and career preparation. it does so in a learning community that encourages…
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
The rochester general college of health careers is dedicated to preparing adult learners with the knowledge, skills, and competencies necessary to pursue health careers, advanced education, and lifelong learning.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Niagara university educates its students and enriches their lives through programs in the liberal arts and through career preparation, informed by the catholic and vincentian traditions.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Center for Family Philanthropy Inc and the most unlike its peers is Schweinfurth Memorial Art Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.9% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
207 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 207 of the 329 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Seward House Museum ↗
- Who funds MERRY-GO-ROUND PLAYHOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds KEUKA COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds WELLS COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds SCHWEINFURTH MEMORIAL ART CENTER ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER ↗
- Who funds ST LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds HOBART AND WILLIAM SMITH COLLEGES ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL NEW YORK COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Trustees of Hamilton College ↗
- Who funds SKIDMORE COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds ST JOHN FISHER UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF CAYUGA COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY ASSOC CAYUGA CO ↗
- Who funds Hartwick College ↗
- Who funds UTICA UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds BOOKER T WASHINGTON COMMUNITY CENTER OF AUBURN NY INC ↗
- Who funds NAZARETH UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds ALFRED UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds CLARKSON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds BEREA COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds AUBURN PUBLIC THEATER INC ↗
- Who funds MARIST UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds THE UPSTATE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE CAYUGA COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CAYUGA MUSEUM OF HISTORY & ART INC ↗
- Who funds NICKS RIDE 4 FRIENDS INC ↗
- Who funds CHAPEL HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds ABC CAYUGA INC ↗
- Who funds THE RESCUE MISSION ALLIANCE OF SYRACUSE ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ROSAMOND GIFFORD ZOO AT BURNET PARK INC ↗
- Who funds ELMIRA COLLEGE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Central New York Community Foundation Inc · The Stanley W Metcalf Foundation Inc · De French Foundation Inc · Allyn Family Foundation Inc · JM McDonald Foundation Inc · The John Ben Snow Foundation Inc · Columbian Foundation Inc · Jim and Juli Boeheim Foundation Inc · Kinney Drugs Foundation Inc · Rochester Area Community Foundation · John Ben Snow Memorial Tr Uw #839158 · Max and Marian Farash Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Fred L Emerson Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Abilis Inc — 74% of income from government
- Kids in Crisis Inc — 49% of income from government
- Special Olympics Connecticut Inc — 42% of income from government
- Citizen Schools Inc — 8% of income from government
- Greenwich Alliance for Education Inc — 3% of income from government
- Bruce Museum Inc — 0% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Fred L Emerson Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Fred L Emerson Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.