Skip to content
Plinth
Funding

New York · Nonprofit

COMMUNITY PRESERVATION COMMITTEE

COMMUNITY PRESERVATION COMMITTEE (New York) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $65,250 to it, the largest being FRED L EMERSON FOUNDATION INC ($62,880). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$290k
Revenue FY2025
3
Funders on record
$65k
Grants received
$2.1M
Net assets
2/3 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 7%

Against its field

COMMUNITY PRESERVATION COMMITTEE runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 10,664 arts & culture nonprofits its size.

Operating margin25% · top quartile
Months of reserve4.8mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)16% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 10,664 arts & culture nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($87k) Expenses 100 ($80k) Net assets 100 ($1.7M)2018 Revenue 833 ($726k) Expenses 107 ($86k) Net assets 137 ($2.4M)2024 Revenue 79 ($69k) Expenses 177 ($142k) Net assets 115 ($2.0M)2025 Revenue 333 ($290k) Expenses 270 ($217k) Net assets 120 ($2.1M)
2017201820242025
Revenue (333)Expenses (270)Net assets (120)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 22% · 2018 1% · 2024 24% · 2025 74%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

82% of COMMUNITY PRESERVATION COMMITTEE’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (64% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 19,459 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 4 reported years ran a deficit.

$7k
17
$641k
18
$73k
24
$73k
25
4.8
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2018 → 2022: the base broadened from 1 funder to 2 funders, grant income fell $50k → $1k.

From the IRS filings of COMMUNITY PRESERVATION COMMITTEE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

COMMUNITY PRESERVATION COMMITTEE leans on a few funders — its largest provides 96% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

96%
largest funder
100%
top three
~1
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2018 100% · 2019 100% · 2021 100% · 2022 81%diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

98% of COMMUNITY PRESERVATION COMMITTEE's grant income comes from New York funders.

NY
PA

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

18
19
21
22
New York out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 3 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like COMMUNITY PRESERVATION COMMITTEE

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In New York

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

89% of spending goes to programs.

Program 89%Management 8%Fundraising 3%

Governance

7
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

87%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

NY

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for COMMUNITY PRESERVATION COMMITTEE: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds COMMUNITY PRESERVATION COMMITTEE?
COMMUNITY PRESERVATION COMMITTEE (New York) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $65,250 to it, the largest being FRED L EMERSON FOUNDATION INC ($62,880). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does COMMUNITY PRESERVATION COMMITTEE have?
IRS filings report 3 organizations giving $65,250 in grants to COMMUNITY PRESERVATION COMMITTEE, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of COMMUNITY PRESERVATION COMMITTEE?
FRED L EMERSON FOUNDATION INC is the largest funder on record, with $62,880 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like COMMUNITY PRESERVATION COMMITTEE find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in New York. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 3funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing