Skip to content

· Private foundation

Fred B Snite Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
32
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$125k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Health$958kHuman Services$841kRecreation & Sports$760kReligion$741kEducation$580kPublic Safety & Disaster$250kYouth Development$235kFood & Nutrition$136kOther$0
02FY2025 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k24 grants · $523k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $600k
$25,213
Median grant
9
States reached
$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME$125,000
ROSALIND FRANKLIN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND SCIENCE$101,289
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES$101,289
GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND$70,000
BIG SHOULDERS$50,862
MISERICORDIA$50,862
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF CHICAGO$50,628
ST ANN SCHOOL$50,000
GOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER$40,429
MERCY HOME FOR BOYS AND GIRLS$35,647
SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL CHICAGO$35,322
LIGHTHOUSE FOR HOPE$30,000
LIFT UP THE VULNERABLE$30,000
ELS FOR AUTISM FOUNDATION$30,000
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$25,993
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $207k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 76% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CATHOLIC CHARITIES HAWAII: $50k → 9%CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY: $20k → 17%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES: $101k → 14%MARILLAC ST VINCENT FAMILY SERVICES: $26k → 14%PLYMOUTH PLACE: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
WY
IN
CA
KY
VA
MD
AZ
NC
HI
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.2M · 28 repeat orgs$766k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +45% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

28 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
14

Total granted

$3.2M
$322k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+26%

Still filing today

39%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $444k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationPhilanthropyReligionPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2021–2025 · $151k · revenue +59%
  • GL
    GOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $136k · revenue +62%
  • WH
    Wellness House
    5× · 2021–2025 · $126k · revenue +45%

Funded once

  • SJ
    St John's Health Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $51k · revenue +153%
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES HAWAII
    one grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue -24%
  • BC
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH
    one grant, 2024 · $26k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Loma Linda University Shared Services Inc

To participate in christ's ministry of health, healing, and wholeness for: education, healthcare, and research by providing support to the lluh entities.

—
2
Loyola University Medical Center

We, loyola university health system and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.lumc is a member of loyola university health system and trinity…

Health
3
Loma Linda University Children's Hospital Foundation

Our children's hospital foundation is dedicated to supporting loma linda university children's hospital's mission to bring whole-child healthcare to the region and beyond.

—
4
Holy Cross Hospital Inc

We, holy cross hospital and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. holy cross hospital is a member of trinity health.

Health
5
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
6
Good Samaritan Hospital Foundation

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

—
7
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
8
Lurie Children's Surgical Foundation Inc

Provide pediatric and subspecialty surgical, research, and educational services.

—
9
Loma Linda University

Loma linda university, a seventh-day adventist christian health sciences institution, seeks to further the healing and teaching ministry of jesus christ "to make man whole" by: - educating ethical and proficient christian health…

Education
10
Loma Linda University Health

The primary purpose of loma linda university health(lluh) is to help coordinate the healing ministry of the seventh-day adventist church. this function is accomplished by managing the various schools and hospitals of lluh's core and…

—
11
Good Shepherd Hospice Foundation Inc

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

—
12
H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Inst Lifetime Cancer Screening Ctr Inc

To promote and support h. lee moffitt cancer center and research institute, inc (institute), h. lee moffitt cancer center and research institute hospital (hospital), and h. lee moffitt cancer foundation by employing physicians who staff…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is God's Love We Deliver Inc; the most unlike its peers is Hinsdale Historical Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/30
Grantees still filing
18/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $250,399 · OtherCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICESST ANN SCHOOL: $235,000 · OtherST ANN SCHOOLBIG SHOULDERS: $225,338 · OtherBIG SHOULDERSCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF CHICAGO: $201,126 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF CHICAGOMISERICORDIA: $186,306 · OtherMISERICORDIAMERCY HOME FOR BOYS AND GIRLS: $157,077 · OtherMERCY HOME FOR BOYS AND GIRLSMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED: $138,092 · OtherPEACE LUTHERAN CHURCH: $135,000 · OtherGIFT OF ADOPTION: $105,000 · OtherRosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science: $101,289 · Other+27 more: $1,106,285 · Other+27 moreUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $750,000 · EducationUniversity of Notre …THE WEBB SCHOOLS: $70,447 · EducationTHE WEBB SCHOOLS+2 more: $20,000 · EducationWellness House: $126,295 · HealthLIGHTHOUSE FOR HOPE INC: $85,000 · HealthELS FOR AUTISM FOUNDATION: $80,000 · HealthSt John's Health Foundation: $51,000 · Health+1 more: $10,078 · HealthCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INC: $101,289 · Human ServicesGUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $70,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES HAWAII: $49,977 · Human ServicesMARILLAC ST VINCENT FAMILY SERVICES INC: $25,835 · Human ServicesCHRIST CHILD SOCIETY: $20,000 · Human ServicesPLYMOUTH PLACE INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $150,840 · Public Safety & DisasterGOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC: $136,100 · Food & NutritionHOLY LAND CHRISTIANS SOCIETY INC: $70,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $25,993 · Religion
Other$2,840,912Education$840,447Health$352,373Human Services$277,101Public Safety & Disaster$150,840Food & Nutrition$136,100Religion$95,993

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $750,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $150,840 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetGOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC: $136,100 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetWellness House: $126,295 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetRosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science: $101,289 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INC: $101,289 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLIGHTHOUSE FOR HOPE INC: $85,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetELS FOR AUTISM FOUNDATION: $80,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHE WEBB SCHOOLS: $70,447 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $70,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOLY LAND CHRISTIANS SOCIETY INC: $70,000 over 2y, 8.3% of budgetBROTHERS AND SISTERS OF LOVE: $65,000 over 2y, 51% of budgetLIFT UP THE VULNERABLE INC: $55,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetSt John's Health Foundation: $51,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetWILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC: $50,389 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES HAWAII: $49,977 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMARILLAC ST VINCENT FAMILY SERVICES INC: $25,835 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHINSDALE HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $25,000 over 1y, 8.5% of budgetSEAL-NSW FAMILY FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCHRIST CHILD SOCIETY: $20,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY MARKEY CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLEUKEMIA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $10,078 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSAINT LEO UNIVERSITY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGirl Scouts of Greater Chicago and Northwest Indiana: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPLYMOUTH PLACE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLISLE BASEBALL-SOFTBALL LEAGUE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 10% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
  • Who funds THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC ↗
  • Who funds Wellness House ↗
  • Who funds Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INC ↗
  • Who funds LIGHTHOUSE FOR HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds ELS FOR AUTISM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LEE MEMORIAL HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WEBB SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
  • Who funds HOLY LAND CHRISTIANS SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds BROTHERS AND SISTERS OF LOVE ↗
  • Who funds LIFT UP THE VULNERABLE INC ↗
  • Who funds St John's Health Foundation ↗
  • Who funds WILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES HAWAII ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds MARILLAC ST VINCENT FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds HINSDALE HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Raymond James Charitable Endowment FundFL10.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Fred B Snite Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fred B Snite Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Saint Leo University Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 56 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Fred B Snite’s filings →

More from the funding graph