· Private foundation
Fred B Snite Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k24 grants · $523k
- $50k–250k8 grants · $600k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME | $125,000 |
| ROSALIND FRANKLIN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND SCIENCE | $101,289 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES | $101,289 |
| GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND | $70,000 |
| BIG SHOULDERS | $50,862 |
| MISERICORDIA | $50,862 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF CHICAGO | $50,628 |
| ST ANN SCHOOL | $50,000 |
| GOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER | $40,429 |
| MERCY HOME FOR BOYS AND GIRLS | $35,647 |
| SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL CHICAGO | $35,322 |
| LIGHTHOUSE FOR HOPE | $30,000 |
| ELS FOR AUTISM FOUNDATION | $30,000 |
| LIFT UP THE VULNERABLE | $30,000 |
| SAMARITAN'S PURSE | $25,993 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $207k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 76% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +45% since the first grant, against +30% for the ones you funded once.
28 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $444k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC4× · 2021–2025 · $151k · revenue +59%- GLGOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC5× · 2021–2025 · $136k · revenue +62%
- WHWellness House5× · 2021–2025 · $126k · revenue +45%
Funded once
- SJSt John's Health Foundationgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $51k · revenue +153%
- CCCATHOLIC CHARITIES HAWAIIone grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue -24%
- BCBREAST CANCER RESEARCHone grant, 2024 · $26k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To participate in christ's ministry of health, healing, and wholeness for: education, healthcare, and research by providing support to the lluh entities.
We, loyola university health system and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.lumc is a member of loyola university health system and trinity…
Our children's hospital foundation is dedicated to supporting loma linda university children's hospital's mission to bring whole-child healthcare to the region and beyond.
We, holy cross hospital and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. holy cross hospital is a member of trinity health.
The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.
We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.
Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…
Provide pediatric and subspecialty surgical, research, and educational services.
Loma linda university, a seventh-day adventist christian health sciences institution, seeks to further the healing and teaching ministry of jesus christ "to make man whole" by: - educating ethical and proficient christian health…
The primary purpose of loma linda university health(lluh) is to help coordinate the healing ministry of the seventh-day adventist church. this function is accomplished by managing the various schools and hospitals of lluh's core and…
We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.
To promote and support h. lee moffitt cancer center and research institute, inc (institute), h. lee moffitt cancer center and research institute hospital (hospital), and h. lee moffitt cancer foundation by employing physicians who staff…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is God's Love We Deliver Inc and the most unlike its peers is Hinsdale Historical Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
- Who funds THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds GOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC ↗
- Who funds Wellness House ↗
- Who funds Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INC ↗
- Who funds LIGHTHOUSE FOR HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds ELS FOR AUTISM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE WEBB SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
- Who funds HOLY LAND CHRISTIANS SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds BROTHERS AND SISTERS OF LOVE ↗
- Who funds LIFT UP THE VULNERABLE INC ↗
- Who funds St John's Health Foundation ↗
- Who funds WILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES HAWAII ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
- Who funds MARILLAC ST VINCENT FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds SEAL-NSW FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Fred B Snite Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Saint Leo University Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.