Skip to content
Frank and Virginia I Demaria Fdn at a glance

· Private foundation

Frank and Virginia I Demaria Fdn

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$312k
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$52k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$123kReligion$85kHuman Services$45kEducation$30kInternational$27kPhilanthropy$26kAnimals$10kMembership Benefit$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $229k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $52k
$10,421
Median grant
5
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GROW CHURCH INC$52,079
SUGARTREE MINISTRY CENTER$31,247
CLINTON COUNTY FOUNDATION$26,039
SAVING MOSES$26,039
MIDOHIO FOODBANK$23,435
CHOICES FOR VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE$23,435
SECOND HARVEST FOODBANK OF NORTH CENTRAL$20,831
STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATI$20,831
OUR LADY OF LOURDES PARISH$15,624
ARLINGTON FOOD ASSISTANCE CENTER$10,421
BLESSING HOUSE$10,416
GREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC$10,416
HONOR FLIGHT CLEVELAND$10,415
HONOR FLIGHT COLUMBUS INC$5,209
COVERED GREATER CINCINNATI$5,208
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $39k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHOICES FOR VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $23k → 15%COVERED GREATER CINCINNATI: $5k → 16%BLESSING HOUSE: $10k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
OH
CA
VA
AR
OK
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

55%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$185k · 8 repeat orgs$151k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
5

Total granted

$185k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+4%

Still filing today

25%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $143k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesFood & NutritionReligionAnimalsYouth DevelopmentEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GC
    GROW CHURCH INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $54k
  • MF
    Mid-Ohio Foodbank
    5× · 2020–2024 · $36k · revenue +5%
  • SM
    Sugartree Ministry Center Inc
    2× · 2023–2024 · $34k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • OL
    OUR LADY OF LOURDES PARISH
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
  • SH
    SECOND HARVEST FOODBANK
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • TM
    Treasures Ministries
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue -1%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
West Ohio Food Bank

Everyone should have access to healthy, nutritious food. Together with our partners, we provide nutritious food to those in need. We do this through collaborating with more than 100 partner agencies, which include emergency pantries, soup…

Food & Nutrition
2
The Food Bank for Larimer County

To provide food to all in need through community partnerships and hunger relief programs. Our vision is a hunger-free Larimer County.

Food & Nutrition
3
Food Bank of Eastern Michigan

The Food Bank of Eastern Michigan's mission is to be the Food Source for people in need. Partnering with organizations to feed the hungry, we advocate and build a community solution to a community problem. By leveraging an abundance of…

Food & Nutrition
4
Stowe Mission of Central Ohio

Christ-focused ministry to inner city residents in central Ohio.

Community Improvement
5
Faith Mission Inc

To create a better world by serving people in need by operating food pantries, homeless shelters, a domestic violence shelter, affordable housing communities, senior living, assisted living and skilled care facilities, a home health care…

Housing & Shelter
6
The Food Pantry Network of Licking County

Distribution of food to those in need.

Food & Nutrition
7
Loaves and Fishes

"rescue" excess perishable food and deliver it to charitable organizations

Food & Nutrition
8
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
9
Ozarks Food Harvest Inc

Ozarks food harvest's mission is to transform hunger into hope.

Food & Nutrition
10
Akron-Canton Regional Foodbank

The mission of the akron-canton regional foodbank is to lead a collaborative network that empowers people to experience healthy and hunger-free lives. we distribute food to feed people and we advocate, engage and convene our community in…

Food & Nutrition
11
Last Mile Food Rescue

Last Mile is a Greater Cincinnati food rescue organization on a mission to save good food and get it to those who need it most. We empower local change-makers to make a critical difference in the lives of our neighbors fighting food…

Food & Nutrition
12
Medina County Food Pantry

Provide emergency food for those in need.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Freestore Foodbank Inc; the most unlike its peers is Honor Flight Cleveland Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
7/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GROW CHURCH INC: $53,829 · OtherGROW CHURCH INCMid-Ohio Foodbank: $35,985 · OtherMid-Ohio FoodbankSECOND HARVEST FOODBANK OF NORTH CENTRAL: $24,081 · OtherSECOND HARVEST FOODBANK OF NORTH CENTRALOUR LADY OF LOURDES PARISH: $19,249 · OtherOUR LADY OF LOURDES PARISHBLANCHESTER LOCAL SCHOOLS: $9,300 · OtherHonor Flight Cleveland Inc: $10,415 · OtherHonor Flight Cleveland Inc+9 more: $35,808 · Other+9 moreCHOICES FOR VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $23,435 · Human ServicesCHOICES FOR …BLESSING HOUSE: $10,416 · Human ServicesBLESSING HOU…COVERD GREATER CINCINNATI: $5,208 · Human ServicesCOVERD GREAT…+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesSugartree Ministry Center Inc: $34,497 · ReligionSugartree …+1 more: $500 · ReligionArlington Food Assistance Center: $10,421 · Food & NutritionGREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC: $10,416 · Food & NutritionFREESTORE FOODBANK INC: $5,208 · Food & NutritionSaving Moses: $26,039 · Youth DevelopmentCLINTON COUNTY FOUNDATION: $26,039 · PhilanthropySTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $20,831 · Education
Other$188,667Human Services$40,059Religion$34,997Food & Nutrition$26,045Youth Development$26,039Philanthropy$26,039Education$20,831

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMid-Ohio Foodbank: $35,985 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSugartree Ministry Center Inc: $34,497 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetSaving Moses: $26,039 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetCLINTON COUNTY FOUNDATION: $26,039 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCHOICES FOR VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $23,435 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $20,831 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetArlington Food Assistance Center: $10,421 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBLESSING HOUSE: $10,416 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetGREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC: $10,416 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHonor Flight Cleveland Inc: $10,415 over 1y, 10% of budgetHONOR FLIGHT COLUMBUS INC: $5,209 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCOVERD GREATER CINCINNATI: $5,208 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFREESTORE FOODBANK INC: $5,208 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDSHIP ANIMAL PROTECTIVE LEAGUE: $5,208 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTreasures Ministries: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetANNETTE CAPPS MINISTRIES INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Edward Jones Foundati…The Blackbaud Giving …Vanguard Charitable E…Paypal Charitable Giv…American Online Givin…Morgan Stanley Global…Natl Christian Charit…Network for GoodNational Philanthropi…Donor Advised Charita…The Bank of America C…Fidelity Investments …
Edward Jones FoundationMO11× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Edward Jones Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Frank and Virginia I Demaria Fdn funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Frank and Virginia I Demaria Fdn. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Frank and Virginia I Demaria Fdn’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home