· Private foundation
Frank and Virginia I Demaria Fdn
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k6 grants · $31k
- $10k–50k12 grants · $229k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $52k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GROW CHURCH INC | $52,079 |
| SUGARTREE MINISTRY CENTER | $31,247 |
| CLINTON COUNTY FOUNDATION | $26,039 |
| SAVING MOSES | $26,039 |
| MIDOHIO FOODBANK | $23,435 |
| CHOICES FOR VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE | $23,435 |
| STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATI | $20,831 |
| SECOND HARVEST FOODBANK OF NORTH CENTRAL | $20,831 |
| OUR LADY OF LOURDES PARISH | $15,624 |
| ARLINGTON FOOD ASSISTANCE CENTER | $10,421 |
| GREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC | $10,416 |
| BLESSING HOUSE | $10,416 |
| HONOR FLIGHT CLEVELAND | $10,415 |
| HONOR FLIGHT COLUMBUS INC | $5,209 |
| BEREAS ANIMAL RESCUE FUND INC | $5,208 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $39k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.
8 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $143k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GCGROW CHURCH INC2× · 2023–2024 · $54k
- MFMid-Ohio Foodbank5× · 2020–2024 · $36k · revenue +5%
- SMSugartree Ministry Center Inc2× · 2023–2024 · $34k · revenue +39%
Funded once
- OLOUR LADY OF LOURDES PARISHone grant, 2021 · $3k
- SHSECOND HARVEST FOODBANKone grant, 2020 · $3k
- CCCUFI CHURCH ASSOCIATIONone grant, 2021 · $1k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Everyone should have access to healthy, nutritious food. Together with our partners, we provide nutritious food to those in need. We do this through collaborating with more than 100 partner agencies, which include emergency pantries, soup…
To provide food to all in need through community partnerships and hunger relief programs. Our vision is a hunger-free Larimer County.
The Food Bank of Eastern Michigan's mission is to be the Food Source for people in need. Partnering with organizations to feed the hungry, we advocate and build a community solution to a community problem. By leveraging an abundance of…
Christ-focused ministry to inner city residents in central Ohio.
To create a better world by serving people in need by operating food pantries, homeless shelters, a domestic violence shelter, affordable housing communities, senior living, assisted living and skilled care facilities, a home health care…
Distribution of food to those in need.
"rescue" excess perishable food and deliver it to charitable organizations
Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…
Ozarks food harvest's mission is to transform hunger into hope.
The mission of the akron-canton regional foodbank is to lead a collaborative network that empowers people to experience healthy and hunger-free lives. we distribute food to feed people and we advocate, engage and convene our community in…
Last Mile is a Greater Cincinnati food rescue organization on a mission to save good food and get it to those who need it most. We empower local change-makers to make a critical difference in the lives of our neighbors fighting food…
Provide emergency food for those in need.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Freestore Foodbank Inc and the most unlike its peers is Honor Flight Cleveland Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Mid-Ohio Foodbank ↗
- Who funds Sugartree Ministry Center Inc ↗
- Who funds Saving Moses ↗
- Who funds CLINTON COUNTY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHOICES FOR VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ↗
- Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Arlington Food Assistance Center ↗
- Who funds GREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds BLESSING HOUSE ↗
- Who funds Honor Flight Cleveland Inc ↗
- Who funds HONOR FLIGHT COLUMBUS INC ↗
- Who funds BEREA'S ANIMAL RESCUE FUND INC ↗
- Who funds COVERD GREATER CINCINNATI ↗
- Who funds FRIENDSHIP ANIMAL PROTECTIVE LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds FREESTORE FOODBANK INC ↗
- Who funds Treasures Ministries ↗
- Who funds ANNETTE CAPPS MINISTRIES INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Edward Jones Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Frank and Virginia I Demaria Fdn funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.