Skip to content
Foundation for Health Leadership and Innovation at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Foundation for Health Leadership and Innovation

The foundation is committed to finding ways to make affordable, quality healthcare available to all individuals by partnering with business, medical, civic, and non-profit leaders to develop innovative health care strategies with special focus on the needs of low-income and underserved patients.

$71k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$1.3MCommunity Improvement$683kHuman Services$580kHousing & Shelter$100kYouth Development$67kEmployment$44kCivil Rights$25kInternational$11k
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $11,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $70,962 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $59,962 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$11,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE ALBERT SCHWEITZER FELLOWSHIP INC$11,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $385k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 46% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%SENIOR RESOURCES OF GUILFORD: $46k → 16%SENIOR RESOURCES OF GUILFORD: $30k → 16%NEW ARRIVALS INSTITUTE: $58k → 16%DURHAM CONGREGATIONS IN ACTION: $19k → 11%NEW ARRIVALS INSTITUTE: $16k → 16%DURHAM CONGREGATIONS IN ACTION: $6k → 11%NORTH CAROLINA JUSTICE CENTER: $34k → 8%NORTH CAROLINA JUSTICE CENTER: $34k → 8%THE ARC OF NORTH CAROLINA: $128k → 8%THE ARC OF NORTH CAROLINA: $14k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.1M · 19 repeat orgs$699k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +2% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
24

Total granted

$2.1M
$699k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+2%
0%

Still filing today

84%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthCommunity ImprovementEducationHousing & ShelterCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EL CENTRO HISPANO INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $280k · revenue +2%
  • VB
    VETERANS BRIDGE HOME INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $200k · revenue +27%
  • TA
    The Arc of North Carolina Inc
    2× · 2022–2023 · $142k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • DUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $250k · revenue +32%
  • WC
    WAKE COUNTY CONTINUUM OF CARE DBA RALEIGH-WAKE PARTNERSHIP TO END AND PREV
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue 0%
  • TL
    THE LIFE CENTER OF DAVIDSON COUNTY INC
    one grant, 2023 · $88k · revenue +19%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Alliance of Disability Advocates

To serve all north carolinians with significant disabilities by ensuring they can live independently in a barrier-free community of their choice through consumer-controlled, self-directed services.

Religion
2
North Carolina Community Health Center Assoc Inc

To promote community based primary health care systems in medically underserved areas.

Health
3
Carolinas Center for Medical Excellence Found ation
Health
4
North Carolina Institute for Constitutional Law
Crime & Legal
5
Wnc Health Network Inc

WNC Health Network, Inc supports people and organizations to improve community health and wellbeing across Western North Carolina.

Health
6
Triangle Global Health Consortium Inc

The mission of the north carolina global health alliance is to advance north carolina as an international center for research, training, education, advocacy and business dedicated to improving the health of the world's communities. we…

Health
7
North Carolina Aids Action Network

The NCAAN improves the lives of people living with HIV/AIDS and affected communities through outreach and public education, policy advocacy and community-building to increase visibility and mutual support of people living with HIV/AIDS…

Health
8
Disability Rights North Carolina

Disability rights north carolina is a legal advocacy organization that advances and defends the rights of people with all types of disabilities, of all ages, throughout north carolina.

—
9
Advance Community Health Community Development Corporation

The community development corporation will create equitable and accessible whole-person solutions for every resident of north carolina through community collaboration and investment made possible by the community development corporation.

Human Services
10
Restorative Transitions Inc

Re-entry Program in Durham NC

Crime & Legal
11
Advance Community Health Inc

To deliver quality, compassionate primary health care. every patient. every time. in response to the needs of our communities.

Health
12
The North Carolina Coalition Against Domestic Violence

Nccadv leads the state's movement to end domestic violence and to enhance work with survivors through collaborations, innovative trainings, prevention, technical assistance, state policy development and legal advocacy.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is El Centro Hispano Inc; the most unlike its peers is New Arrivals Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/24
Grantees still filing
14/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MINORITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: $302,964 · OtherNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MINORITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENTVETERANS BRIDGE HOME INC: $199,998 · OtherVETERANS BRIDGE HOME INCORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS: $153,840 · OtherORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONSDavidson Medical Ministries Clinic Inc: $100,000 · OtherDavidson Medical Ministries Clinic IncTHE FAMILY VIOLENCE PREVENTION CENTER INC: $94,935 · OtherTHE FAMILY VIOLENCE PREVENTION CENTER INCTHE LIFE CENTER OF DAVIDSON COUNTY INC: $88,138 · OtherTHE LIFE CENTER OF DAVIDSON COUNTY INCLEE COUNTY: $73,761 · OtherLEE COUNTYHAVEN IN LEE COUNTY INC: $66,534 · Other+20 more: $273,515 · Other+20 moreDUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $250,000 · HealthDUKE UNIVERSITY H…B&D Integrated Health Services: $98,437 · HealthB&D Integrated He…HAVEN HOUSE INC: $67,456 · HealthHAVEN HOUSE INCThe Arc of North Carolina Inc: $141,604 · Human ServicesThe Arc of Nort…SENIOR RESOURCES OF GUILFORD: $76,144 · Human ServicesSENIOR RESOURCE…NEW ARRIVALS INSTITUTE INC: $73,970 · Human ServicesNEW ARRIVALS IN…NORTH CAROLINA JUSTICE CENTER: $68,062 · Human ServicesNORTH CAROLINA …Durham Congregations in Action: $25,000 · Human ServicesDurham Congrega…EL CENTRO HISPANO INC: $280,427 · Community ImprovementEL CENTRO HISPA…ALAMANCE DREAM CENTER INC: $100,000 · Community ImprovementALAMANCE DREAM …WAKE COUNTY CONTINUUM OF CARE DBA RALEIGH-WAKE PARTNERSHIP TO END AND PREV: $100,000 · Housing & ShelterLGBT CENTER OF RALEIGH INC: $74,121 · Civil RightsDENTAL FOUNDATION OF NORTH CAROLINA INC: $20,000 · EducationThe North Carolina Albert Schweitzer Fellowship Inc: $11,000 · EducationTHE ALBERT SCHWEITZER FELLOWSHIP: $22,000 · International
Other$1,353,685Health$415,893Human Services$384,780Community Improvement$380,427Housing & Shelter$100,000Civil Rights$74,121Education$31,000International$22,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MINORITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: $302,964 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetEL CENTRO HISPANO INC: $280,427 over 2y, 6.7% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $250,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVETERANS BRIDGE HOME INC: $199,998 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetThe Arc of North Carolina Inc: $141,604 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetALAMANCE DREAM CENTER INC: $100,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetDavidson Medical Ministries Clinic Inc: $100,000 over 2y, 6.0% of budgetWAKE COUNTY CONTINUUM OF CARE DBA RALEIGH-WAKE PARTNERSHIP TO END AND PREV: $100,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetB&D Integrated Health Services: $98,437 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetTHE FAMILY VIOLENCE PREVENTION CENTER INC: $94,935 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetTHE LIFE CENTER OF DAVIDSON COUNTY INC: $88,138 over 1y, 8.3% of budgetSENIOR RESOURCES OF GUILFORD: $76,144 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetLGBT CENTER OF RALEIGH INC: $74,121 over 2y, 7.7% of budgetNEW ARRIVALS INSTITUTE INC: $73,970 over 2y, 4.6% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA JUSTICE CENTER: $68,062 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetHAVEN HOUSE INC: $67,456 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetHAVEN IN LEE COUNTY INC: $66,534 over 2y, 5.7% of budgetDurham Congregations in Action: $25,000 over 2y, 8.9% of budgetTHE ALBERT SCHWEITZER FELLOWSHIP: $22,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetDENTAL FOUNDATION OF NORTH CAROLINA INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetThe North Carolina Albert Schweitzer Fellowship Inc: $11,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetPARTNERSHIP FOR COMMUNITY CARE INC: $6,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA DENTAL HYGIENISTS' ASSOCIATION: $5,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Triangle Community Fo…Foundation for the Ca…North Carolina Commun…Duke Energy FoundationCommunity Foundation …The Golden Leaf IncAj Fletcher FoundationDuke University Healt…United Way of the Gre…The Leon Levine Found…Blueprint North Carol…Duke University
Triangle Community Foundation IncNC20.3× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Triangle Community Foundation Inc · Foundation for the Carolinas · North Carolina Community Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · Community Foundation of Greater Greensboro Inc · The Golden Leaf Inc · Aj Fletcher Foundation · Duke University Health System Inc · United Way of the Greater Triangle Inc · The Leon Levine Foundation · Blueprint North Carolina · Duke University

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Foundation for Health Leadership and Innovation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Foundation for Health Leadership and Innovation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Foundation for Health Leadership and Innovation’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home