Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Blueprint North Carolina

The Organization is a partnership of public policy, advocacy and grassroots organizing nonprofits dedicated to achieving a better, fairer, healthier North Carolina through the development of an integrated communications and civic engagement strategy.

$731k
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Public Benefit$9.8MCivil Rights$2.6MCommunity Improvement$2.0MHuman Services$1.1MPublic Safety & Disaster$1.0MEnvironment$659kReligion$537kYouth Development$490kOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k20 grants · $573k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $200k
$30,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$3.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Mi Familia En Accion$50,000
NC A Philip Randolph Institute Inc$50,000
NC A Philip Randolph Institute Inc$50,000
Mi Familia En Accion$50,000
Peoples Solidarity Hub$40,000
Legacy Bridge NC$40,000
Tranzmission Inc$40,000
Southern Vision Alliance$40,000
Richmond County Coalition for Justice and Black Empowerment$40,000
Reparations Stakekholder Authority of Asheville$40,000
SEAC Village$40,000
NC Black Alliance$30,000
Shackle Free Community Outreach Agency Inc$27,000
Shackle Free Community Outreach Agency Inc$27,000
Valores$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $2.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 45% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%Immigrant Legal Resource Center: $40k → 10%Latino Advocacy Coalition of Henderson County Inc: $22k → 12%Jones County Community Hope Inc: $35k → 17%Alphalife Enrichment Center Inc: $28k → 18%Casa Azul de Wilson: $35k → 20%Shackle Free Community Outreach Agency Inc: $112k → 20%Men and Women United for Youth and Families: $50k → 21%NC Field Inc: $30k → 21%Antonio Blow Ministries: $22k → 25%Latino Advocacy Coalition of Henderson County Inc: $21k → 12%Alpha Life Enrichment Center: $25k → 18%Casa Azul de Wilson: $25k → 20%Shackle Free Community Outreach Agency Inc: $27k → 20%Men and Women United for Youth and Families: $22k → 21%Latino Advocacy Coalition: $19k → 12%Alphalife Enrichment Center Inc: $20k → 18%Casa Azul de Wilson: $22k → 20%Shackle Free Community Outreach Agency Inc: $27k → 20%Men and Women United for Youth and Families: $22k → 21%Alphalife Enrichment Center Inc: $19k → 18%Shackle Free Community Outreach Agency Inc: $25k → 20%Men and Women United for Youth and Families: $20k → 21%National Coalition of Black Women Rising: $35k → 20%Shackle Free Community Outreach Agency Inc: $22k → 20%Men and Women United for Youth and Families: $20k → 21%National Coalition of Black Women Rising: $35k → 20%NC A Philip Randolph Institute Inc: $320k → 8%Tranzmission Inc: $40k → 12%NC A Philip Randolph Institute Inc: $290k → 8%SEAC Village: $40k → 10%Tranzmission Inc: $25k → 12%Southeast Asian Coalition: $25k → 10%Tranzmission Inc: $25k → 12%Southeast Asian Coalition: $25k → 10%Tranzmission Inc: $20k → 12%Southeast Asian Coalition: $20k → 10%Companeros Inmigrantes de last Montanas en Accion: $28k → 12%Southeastern Asian Coalition: $40k → 10%NC A Philip Randolph Institute Inc: $50k → 8%NC A Philip Randolph Institute Inc: $50k → 8%NARAL Pro-Choice NC Foundation: $40k → 11%Coalicion Latinoamericana (Latin America Coalition): $19k → 10%Morrisville Education and Community Service Enterprise LLC: $22k → 8%El Pueblo: $129k → 8%El Pueblo: $120k → 8%El Pueblo: $27k → 8%El Pueblo: $21k → 8%El Pueblo: $20k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
IL
MI
NY
MA
IN
CA
AZ
NC
SC
DC
GA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$16M · 97 repeat orgs$4.7M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +45% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.

97 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2025, 81 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

97
156

Total granted

$16M
$4.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+21%

Still filing today

70%
54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $220k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCivil RightsCommunity ImprovementEnvironmentArts & CultureEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DN
    Democracy North Carolina
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2.1M · revenue +45%
  • SOUTHERN VISION ALLIANCE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $832k · revenue ×25
  • UO
    UNIFOUR ONE INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $581k · revenue +519%

Funded once

  • SA
    SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC
    one grant, 2023 · $544k · revenue +8%
  • SS
    Sign Scientist
    one grant, 2021 · $360k
  • LN
    LEAD NC INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2018 · $225k · revenue -31%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
North Carolina Empowerment Organization
Civil Rights
2
Forward Justice Action Network

Forward Justice Action Network is a nonprofit with the purpose to engage in educational and advocacy activities to promote political and grassroots support for public policies that advance racial social and economic justice in North…

Human Services
3
Nc Local Inc

Expands local news across North Carolina

Civil Rights
4
North Carolina Latino Power

The mission of NC Latino Power is to build and expand political and civic participation among Latino citizens of North Carolina through leadership training, voter education, and organizing within faith and community institutions.

Education
5
North Carolinians for Redistricting Reform

North Carolinians for Redistricting Reform (NC4RR) is a bipartisan nonprofit working to improve North Carolina's representative democracy through redistricting reform. NC4RR's objective is to help pass a state constitutional amendment in…

—
6
Community Industry Value Interactionist League

NC CIVIL is a nonprofit community impact organization that develops grassroots approaches to structural disparities. Our mission is to increase resident involvement, improve organization of resources, and help institutions partner…

Youth Development
7
North Carolina Community Action Association

To encourage, promote, and stimulate the community development of human resources, principally to eliminate poverty through the operation of community action programs.

—
8
Progress North Carolina Action

Progress North Carolina Action conducts research, sponsors educational activities and events, and disseminates accurate and timely information to promote the general public's understanding of ways to maintain and improve North Carolina's…

Public Benefit
9
North Carolina for the People

To educate the public on how to build a democracy where everyone participates, every vote is counted, voting rights are fully enforced, and everyone's voice is heard; to work toward a system where everyone has a say in decisions that…

Civil Rights
10
Center for Participatory Change

Igniting collective power. Transforming systems of oppression. Healing in community.

Community Improvement
11
Blueprint North Carolina

The Organization is a partnership of public policy, advocacy and grassroots organizing nonprofits dedicated to achieving a better, fairer, healthier North Carolina through the development of an integrated communications and civic…

Education
12
Action Nc

Action nc is a community organization and citizen action group that organizes residents of low-wealth communities and constituencies - most of whom are people of color- to represent their own interests on issues of social and economic…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is North Carolina Justice Center and the most unlike its peers is Brace Community Outreach. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyEnvironmental Conservation …Immigrant Worker SupportChristian Youth CampsCommunity Arts CentersDevelopmental Disabilities …Women & Girls Leadership De…Affordable Housing Developm…Youth Mentoring ProgramsCommunity FoundationsHealth Access Advocacy and …Addiction Recovery ServicesIndependent K-12 SchoolsCommunity College Foundatio…Lgbtq+ Community SupportPregnancy Support ServicesPolicy Research and AdvocacyCommunity Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 17 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number26%13%<5yr16%23%5–10yr20%18%10–20yr14%21%20–35yr12%15%35–55yr12%11%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value26%17%<5yr16%23%5–10yr20%10%10–20yr14%28%20–35yr12%17%35–55yr12%5%55yr+

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 13% of your grantees by number, and just 17% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 6% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
6%
15/257
the rest of the field
15%
7,945/52,923

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

161 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 161 of the 258 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

12
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
55
Early backer (in before they grew)
155/161
Grantees still filing
98/161
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

A BETTER CHANCE A BETTER COMMUNITY — $648,850 · OtherA BETTER CHANCE A BETTER COMMUNITYSign Scientist — $359,609 · OtherDISABILITY RIGHTS NORTH CAROLINA — $338,000 · OtherCOLUMBUS COUNTY FORUM INC — $325,101 · Other+131 more — $7,572,747 · Other+131 moreDemocracy North Carolina — $2,056,375 · Civil RightsDemocracy North Caro…N C A PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE INC — $528,610 · Civil RightsN C A PHILIP RANDOLP…NORTH CAROLINA ASIAN AMERICANS TOGETHER — $222,860 · Civil RightsNORTH CAROLINA ASIAN…PODER NC ACTION — $158,672 · Civil RightsWOMEN ADVANCE — $127,500 · Civil Rights+11 more — $526,983 · Civil Rights+11 moreNORTH CAROLINA A PHILIP RANDOLPH EDUCATIONAL FUND — $781,000 · Human ServicesNORTH CAROLINA …EL PUEBLO INC — $429,234 · Human ServicesEL PUEBLO INCSHACKLE FREE COMMUNITY OUTREACH AGENCY INC — $225,500 · Human ServicesSHACKLE FREE CO…ALPHA LIFE ENRICHMENT CENTER INC — $205,826 · Human ServicesALPHA LIFE ENRI…MEN & WOMEN UNITED FOR YOUTH & FAMILIES INC — $194,550 · Human ServicesMEN & WOMEN UNI…SOUTHEAST ASIAN COALITION — $173,500 · Human ServicesSOUTHEAST ASIAN…Casa Azul De Wilson — $111,500 · Human ServicesTRANZMISSION INC — $110,000 · Human Services+15 more — $607,393 · Human Services+15 moreUNIFOUR ONE INC — $581,320 · Community ImprovementFUERZA Y UNION MULTIPLE — $205,950 · Community ImprovementHISPANIC FEDERATION INC — $205,400 · Community ImprovementEL CENTRO HISPANO INC — $142,030 · Community ImprovementALLIANCE FOR A JUST SOCIETY — $100,000 · Community ImprovementPartners in Community Inc — $81,500 · Community ImprovementWAKEUP WAKE COUNTY INC — $64,250 · Community Improvement+4 more — $76,953 · Community ImprovementSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC — $544,114 · EnvironmentNORTH CAROLINA LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS FOUNDATION — $252,374 · EnvironmentGOODPOWER EDUCATION FUND INC — $248,788 · EnvironmentSol Nation Inc — $129,300 · EnvironmentNORTH CAROLINA CONSERVATION NETWORK — $83,000 · EnvironmentNORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE NETWORK — $60,000 · Environment+3 more — $43,250 · EnvironmentSOUTHERN VISION ALLIANCE — $831,953 · Public BenefitCOMMON CAUSE EDUCATION FUND — $341,000 · Public Benefit+2 more — $58,250 · Public BenefitASSOCIACION DE MEXICANOS EN CAROLINA DEL NORT — $360,325 · InternationalCHURCH WORLD SERVICE INC — $304,191 · International
Other$9,244,307Civil Rights$3,621,000Human Services$2,838,503Community Improvement$1,457,403Environment$1,360,826Public Benefit$1,231,203International$664,516

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDemocracy North Carolina — $2,056,375 over 9y, 20% of budgetSOUTHERN VISION ALLIANCE — $831,953 over 9y, 9.2% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA A PHILIP RANDOLPH EDUCATIONAL FUND — $781,000 over 5y, 4.7% of budgetUNIFOUR ONE INC — $581,320 over 7y, 12% of budgetSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC — $544,114 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetEL PUEBLO INC — $429,234 over 6y, 9.4% of budgetASSOCIACION DE MEXICANOS EN CAROLINA DEL NORT — $360,325 over 6y, 23% of budgetCOMMON CAUSE EDUCATION FUND — $341,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetDISABILITY RIGHTS NORTH CAROLINA — $338,000 over 5y, 3.2% of budgetCHURCH WORLD SERVICE INC — $304,191 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetPENDER UNITED INC — $302,186 over 3y, 56% of budgetKinston Teens Inc — $289,110 over 5y, 60% of budgetEmancipate NC Inc — $276,500 over 4y, 19% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS FOUNDATION — $252,374 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetGOODPOWER EDUCATION FUND INC — $248,788 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetSHACKLE FREE COMMUNITY OUTREACH AGENCY INC — $225,500 over 4y, 19% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA ASIAN AMERICANS TOGETHER — $222,860 over 7y, 10% of budgetFUERZA Y UNION MULTIPLE — $205,950 over 2y, 93% of budgetALPHA LIFE ENRICHMENT CENTER INC — $205,826 over 4y, 7.4% of budgetHISPANIC FEDERATION INC — $205,400 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMEN & WOMEN UNITED FOR YOUTH & FAMILIES INC — $194,550 over 3y, 18% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA BLACK ALLIANCE INC — $192,550 over 3y, 4.8% of budgetCOMMON CAUSE — $179,800 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetSOUTHERN COALITION FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE — $174,500 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetSOUTHEAST ASIAN COALITION — $173,500 over 6y, 8.1% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS — $170,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetACTION INSTITUTE NC — $161,536 over 5y, 7.6% of budgetInstitute for Southern Studies Inc — $160,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetPODER NC ACTION — $158,672 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetEL CENTRO HISPANO INC — $142,030 over 2y, 7.2% of budgetVALORES INC — $131,000 over 2y, 69% of budgetSol Nation Inc — $129,300 over 2y, 59% of budgetWOMEN ADVANCE — $127,500 over 3y, 69% of budgetCasa Azul De Wilson — $111,500 over 3y, 7.0% of budgetTRANZMISSION INC — $110,000 over 3y, 18% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF NORTH CAROLINA LEGAL FOUNDATION INC — $106,550 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetNC CONGRESS OF LATINO ORGANIZATIONS (NCCLO) — $105,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetALLIANCE FOR A JUST SOCIETY — $100,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP EDUC FUND INC — $94,128 over 5y, 7.1% of budgetNorth Carolina Association of CED Inc — $92,800 over 3y, 27% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION — $92,060 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLITTLE ROCK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $91,750 over 3y, 6.9% of budgetWE ARE DOWN HOME — $85,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetLatino Advocacy Coalition of Henderson County Inc — $84,197 over 3y, 18% of budgetNorth Carolina Aids Action Network — $83,430 over 4y, 7.5% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA CONSERVATION NETWORK — $83,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetPartners in Community Inc — $81,500 over 2y, 29% of budgetASHEVILLE CREATIVE ARTS INC — $81,000 over 2y, 9.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Democracy North Carolina ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN VISION ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds NORTH CAROLINA A PHILIP RANDOLPH EDUCATIONAL FUND ↗
  • Who funds UNIFOUR ONE INC ↗
  • Who funds SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC ↗
  • Who funds N C A PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds EL PUEBLO INC ↗
  • Who funds ASSOCIACION DE MEXICANOS EN CAROLINA DEL NORT ↗
  • Who funds COMMON CAUSE EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds DISABILITY RIGHTS NORTH CAROLINA ↗
  • Who funds CHURCH WORLD SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds PENDER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds Kinston Teens Inc ↗
  • Who funds Emancipate NC Inc ↗
  • Who funds NORTH CAROLINA LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GOODPOWER EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds SHACKLE FREE COMMUNITY OUTREACH AGENCY INC ↗
  • Who funds LEAD NC INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds NORTH CAROLINA ASIAN AMERICANS TOGETHER ↗
  • Who funds FUERZA Y UNION MULTIPLE ↗
  • Who funds ALPHA LIFE ENRICHMENT CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds HISPANIC FEDERATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MEN & WOMEN UNITED FOR YOUTH & FAMILIES INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH CAROLINA BLACK ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMON CAUSE ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN COALITION FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHEAST ASIAN COALITION ↗
  • Who funds NORTH CAROLINA LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS ↗
  • Who funds ACTION INSTITUTE NC ↗
  • Who funds Institute for Southern Studies Inc ↗
  • Who funds PODER NC ACTION ↗
  • Who funds EL CENTRO HISPANO INC ↗
  • Who funds VALORES INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Z Smith Reynolds Foun…Nc Counts CoalitionNEO Philanthropy IncTriangle Community Fo…Common Cause Educatio…Southern Coalition fo…NEO Philanthropy Acti…Southern Vision Allia…Imagine North Carolin…North Carolina Commun…Community Foundation …The Conservation Fund…
Z Smith Reynolds Foundation IncNC126.6× affinity70 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Z Smith Reynolds Foundation Inc · Nc Counts Coalition · NEO Philanthropy Inc · Triangle Community Foundation Inc · Common Cause Education Fund · Southern Coalition for Social Justice · NEO Philanthropy Action Fund Inc · Southern Vision Alliance · Imagine North Carolina First · North Carolina Community Foundation · Community Foundation of Greater Greensboro Inc · The Conservation Fund a Nonprofit Corporation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Blueprint North Carolina funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Campus Compact — 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
21report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 258 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home