· Public charity
Foundation for Health Leadership and Innovation
The foundation is committed to finding ways to make affordable, quality healthcare available to all individuals by partnering with business, medical, civic, and non-profit leaders to develop innovative health care strategies with special focus on the needs of low-income and underserved patients.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 49% of FOUNDATION FOR HEALTH LEADERSHIP AND INNOVATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 1 grants below total $11,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $70,962 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $59,962 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE ALBERT SCHWEITZER FELLOWSHIP INC | $11,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $385k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 46% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
19 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
EL CENTRO HISPANO INC2× · 2023–2024 · $280k · revenue +2%- VBVETERANS BRIDGE HOME INC2× · 2023–2024 · $200k · revenue +27%
- TAThe Arc of North Carolina Inc2× · 2022–2023 · $142k · revenue +34%
Funded once
DUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $250k · revenue +32%- WCWAKE COUNTY CONTINUUM OF CARE DBA RALEIGH-WAKE PARTNERSHIP TO END AND PREVone grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue 0%
- TLTHE LIFE CENTER OF DAVIDSON COUNTY INCone grant, 2023 · $88k · revenue +19%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To serve all north carolinians with significant disabilities by ensuring they can live independently in a barrier-free community of their choice through consumer-controlled, self-directed services.
To promote community based primary health care systems in medically underserved areas.
The NCAAN improves the lives of people living with HIV/AIDS and affected communities through outreach and public education, policy advocacy and community-building to increase visibility and mutual support of people living with HIV/AIDS…
WNC Health Network, Inc supports people and organizations to improve community health and wellbeing across Western North Carolina.
Nccadv leads the state's movement to end domestic violence and to enhance work with survivors through collaborations, innovative trainings, prevention, technical assistance, state policy development and legal advocacy.
Help Durham residents love neighbors.
Re-entry Program in Durham NC
Disability rights north carolina is a legal advocacy organization that advances and defends the rights of people with all types of disabilities, of all ages, throughout north carolina.
The community development corporation will create equitable and accessible whole-person solutions for every resident of north carolina through community collaboration and investment made possible by the community development corporation.
The mission of the north carolina global health alliance is to advance north carolina as an international center for research, training, education, advocacy and business dedicated to improving the health of the world's communities. we…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is El Centro Hispano Inc and the most unlike its peers is New Arrivals Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MINORITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ↗
- Who funds EL CENTRO HISPANO INC ↗
- Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM INC ↗
- Who funds VETERANS BRIDGE HOME INC ↗
- Who funds The Arc of North Carolina Inc ↗
- Who funds Davidson Medical Ministries Clinic Inc ↗
- Who funds ALAMANCE DREAM CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds WAKE COUNTY CONTINUUM OF CARE DBA RALEIGH-WAKE PARTNERSHIP TO END AND PREV ↗
- Who funds B&D Integrated Health Services ↗
- Who funds THE FAMILY VIOLENCE PREVENTION CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE LIFE CENTER OF DAVIDSON COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds SENIOR RESOURCES OF GUILFORD ↗
- Who funds LGBT CENTER OF RALEIGH INC ↗
- Who funds NEW ARRIVALS INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds NORTH CAROLINA JUSTICE CENTER ↗
- Who funds HAVEN HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds HAVEN IN LEE COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds Raleigh Immigrants Community Inc ↗
- Who funds Durham Congregations in Action ↗
- Who funds THE ALBERT SCHWEITZER FELLOWSHIP ↗
- Who funds DENTAL FOUNDATION OF NORTH CAROLINA INC ↗
- Who funds The North Carolina Albert Schweitzer Fellowship Inc ↗
- Who funds PARTNERSHIP FOR COMMUNITY CARE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Triangle Community Foundation Inc · Foundation for the Carolinas · North Carolina Community Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · Community Foundation of Greater Greensboro Inc · The Golden Leaf Inc · Aj Fletcher Foundation · Duke University Health System Inc · United Way of the Greater Triangle Inc · The Leon Levine Foundation · Blueprint North Carolina · Duke University
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Foundation for Health Leadership and Innovation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.