Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Foundation for Advancement in Conservation

To undertake and underwrite programs and initiatives to advance the conservation profession in all its facets, to support conservation education and career development, and to apply the expertise of the profession in addressing the nation's artistic, cultural, and historic preservation priorities.

$329k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$37k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0191% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2024.

Arts & Culture$977kEducation$476kOther$148k
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 7 grants below total $199,363 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $328,777 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $129,414 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $185k
$37,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$7.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LOS ANGELES COUNTY MUSEUM OF ART$37,000
TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA$37,000
NELSON ATKINS MUSEUM OF ART$37,000
DENVER ART MUSEUM$37,000
RINGLING MUSEUM OF ART FOUNDATION$37,000
BALBOA ART CONSERVATION CENTER$8,000
CONSERVATION FOR ART & HISTORIC ARTIFACTS$6,363
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 79% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%HISTORIC NEW ENGLAND: $32k → 8%NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $83k → 16%GETTYSBURG FOUNDATION: $37k → 9%SOCIETY TO PRESERVE THE MILLVALE MURALS OF MAXO VANKA: $37k → 11%CCAHA: $37k → 22%BALBOA ART CONSERVATION CENTER: $37k → 11%AUTRY MUSEUM OF THE AMERICAN WEST: $37k → 14%MUSEUM AT THE FASHION INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $37k → 17%PRATT INSTITUTE: $48k → 20%CLEMSON UNIVERSITY-WARREN LASCH CONSERVATION CENTER: $37k → 16%NATIONAL MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $37k → 14%RINGLING MUSEUM OF ART FOUNDATION: $37k → 10%DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS: $32k → 21%MISSOURI HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $37k → 11%NELSON ATKINS MUSEUM OF ART: $37k → 15%DENVER ART MUSEUM: $37k → 12%INDIANAPOLIS MUSEUM OF ART: $37k → 16%CLEVELAND MUSEUM OF ART: $37k → 17%TOLEDO MUSEUM OF ART: $37k → 18%ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $37k → 14%THE MARINER'S MUSEUM: $37k → 17%SHELBURNE MUSEUM INC: $32k → 10%PRESERVATION MARYLAND: $8k → 19%NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $43k → 16%CONSERVATION FOR ART & HISTORIC ARTIFACTS: $6k → 22%BALBOA ART CONSERVATION CENTER: $8k → 11%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES: $32k → 14%NEW YORK UNIVERSITY: $37k → 17%PRATT INSTITUTE: $39k → 20%SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION HIRSHHORN MUSEUM AND SCULPTURE GARDEN: $32k → 14%PRESERVATION MARYLAND: $8k → 19%NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $31k → 16%TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $37k → 22%REGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES: $5k → 14%AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $37k → 17%PRATT INSTITUTE: $9k → 20%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $37k → 19%REGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES: $5k → 14%THE WALTERS ART MUSEUM: $32k → 19%UCLA FOUNDATION: $37k → 14%ACADEMY FOUNDATION: $37k → 14%LOS ANGELES COUNTY MUSEUM OF ART: $37k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
IL
MI
NY
MA
IN
OH
PA
CT
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
SC
DC
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region — $50k on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 6 regions, $37k to organizations and $13k to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

North America (Canada and Mexico)$39k · 78% · 1 grant · 2 people

Stated purpose: KRESS CONSERVATION FELLOWSHIP GRANT · TRAVEL STIPEND-PHOTO WORKSHOP

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$4k · 8% · 4 people

Stated purpose: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT & KRESS INTERNATIONAL TRAVEL SCHOLARSHIPS

South America$2k · 4% · 2 people

Stated purpose: KRESS INTERNATIONAL TRAVEL SCHOLARSHIPS

Middle East and North Africa$2k · 4% · 2 people

Stated purpose: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT & KRESS INTERNATIONAL TRAVEL SCHOLARSHIPS

East Asia and the Pacific$2k · 4% · 2 people

Stated purpose: KRESS INTERNATIONAL TRAVEL SCHOLARSHIPS

South Asia$1k · 2% · 1 person

Stated purpose: KRESS INTERNATIONAL TRAVEL SCHOLARSHIPS

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

40%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$591k · 7 repeat orgs$900k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
21

Total granted

$591k
$752k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+34%

Still filing today

86%
90%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 9% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $148k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION
    4× · 2018–2022 · $190k · revenue +33%
  • NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2020–2022 · $158k · revenue +63%
  • PI
    PRATT INSTITUTE
    3× · 2020–2022 · $96k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • FI
    FASHION INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $37k · revenue +92%
  • CU
    CLEMSON UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2023 · $37k
  • MH
    MISSOURI HISTORICAL SOCIETYgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $37k · revenue +83%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Museum of Fine Arts Houston

The museum of fine arts, houston serves as a welcoming and inclusive place for all people, connecting the communities of houston with diverse histories of art spanning 6,000 years and six continents. through our permanent collections,…

Arts & Culture
2
The Pierpont Morgan Library

The Morgan Library & Museum celebrates and shares the history and process of human creativity from antiquity to the present day through the preservation, study, and interpretation of a dynamic and growing collection.

Education
3
Clyfford Still Museum

Home to the art and legacy of the american painter clyfford still, we invite all to explore the potential of individual creative endeavor.

Arts & Culture
4
Metropolitan Museum of Art

The metropolitan museum of art collects, studies, conserves, and presents significant works of art across all times and cultures in order to connect people to creativity, knowledge, and ideas.

Arts & Culture
5
San Francisco Museum of Modern Art

See schedule osfmoma believes the art of our time is vital and shares it with passion and purpose, and that art and the creative process can open minds and help build a better world. for that reason, we assemble unparalleled collections,…

Arts & Culture
6
Henry E Huntington Library and Art Gallery

The huntington library, art museum, and botanical gardens shares its world-renowned collections to support scholarship, foster learning, inspire creativity, and offer transformative experiences for diverse audiences.

Arts & Culture
7
The Brooklyn Institute of Arts and Sciences

The mission of the brooklyn institute of arts and sciences, d/b/a brooklyn museum (the "museum") is to bring people together through art and experiences that inspire celebration, compassion, courage, and the will to act. (see schedule o).

Arts & Culture
8
The Newark Museum Association

Nmoa mission statement is: we welcome everyone with inclusive experiences that spark curiosity and foster community.

Arts & Culture
9
The Phillips Collection

The phillips collection is the oldest museum of modern and contemporary art in the u.s. in addition to presentation of works from the permanent collection and special exhibitions, the museum maintains active educational, academic,…

Arts & Culture
10
Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum Inc

Organization's mission statement true to the ambitious vision of its founder and her spirit of creative risk-taking, the mission of the isabella stewart gardner museum is: - to bring to life and preserve the rich historic collection; - to…

Arts & Culture
11
Baltimore Museum of Art

The baltimore museum of art connects art to baltimore and baltimore to the world, embodying a commitment to artistic excellence and social equity in every decision from art presentation, interpretation, and collecting, to the composition…

Arts & Culture
12
Munson-Williams-Proctor Arts Institute

Munson-williams-proctor arts institute (mwpai) is a fine arts center dedicated to serving diverse audiences by advancing the appreciation, understanding, and enjoyment of the arts. the art institute aims to promote interest and…

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Toledo Museum of Art and the most unlike its peers is The Society to Preserve the Millvale Murals of Maxo Vanka. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 77 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%3%10–20yr16%6%20–35yr13%22%35–55yr16%69%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%2%10–20yr16%13%20–35yr13%15%35–55yr16%69%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/36
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,529

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/33
Grantees still filing
26/33
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION — $190,000 · Arts & CultureSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTIONBALBOA ART CONSERVATION CENTER — $45,000 · Arts & CultureCONSERVATION CENTER FOR ART & HISTORIC ARTIFACTS — $43,363 · Arts & CultureMISSOURI HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $37,000 · Arts & CultureAUTRY MUSEUM OF THE AMERICAN WEST — $37,000 · Arts & CultureGETTYSBURG FOUNDATION — $37,000 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM ASSOCIATES — $37,000 · Arts & CultureTHE TOLEDO MUSEUM OF ART — $37,000 · Arts & CultureCLEVELAND MUSEUM OF ART — $37,000 · Arts & CultureColonial Williamsburg Foundation — $37,000 · Arts & CultureDENVER ART MUSEUM — $37,000 · Arts & CultureTHE SOCIETY TO PRESERVE THE MILLVALE MURALS OF MAXO VANKA — $37,000 · Arts & CultureAmerican Museum of Natural History — $37,000 · Arts & CultureTHE NELSON GALLERY FOUNDATION — $37,000 · Arts & CultureNewfields Inc — $37,000 · Arts & CultureTHE JOHN & MABLE RINGLING MUSEUM OF ART FOUNDATION INCORPORATED — $37,000 · Arts & CultureACADEMY FOUNDATION — $37,000 · Arts & CultureTHE MARINERS' MUSEUM — $37,000 · Arts & Culture+5 more — $144,000 · Arts & Culture+5 moreNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY — $157,792 · EducationNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITYPRATT INSTITUTE — $96,407 · EducationPRATT INSTITUTEUCLA FOUNDATION — $37,000 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATIONJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $37,000 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITYNew York University — $37,000 · EducationNew York UniversityYale University — $37,000 · EducationYale UniversityTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $37,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PEN…THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO — $37,000 · EducationTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGOREGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIA — $42,132 · OtherREGENTS UN…FASHION INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY FOUNDATION — $37,000 · OtherFASHION IN…CLEMSON UNIVERSITY — $37,000 · OtherCLEMSON UN…UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS — $32,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY…
Arts & Culture$977,363Education$476,199Other$148,132

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION — $190,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY — $157,792 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPRATT INSTITUTE — $96,407 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBALBOA ART CONSERVATION CENTER — $45,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetCONSERVATION CENTER FOR ART & HISTORIC ARTIFACTS — $43,363 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetFASHION INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY FOUNDATION — $37,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION — $37,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMISSOURI HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $37,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAUTRY MUSEUM OF THE AMERICAN WEST — $37,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $37,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGETTYSBURG FOUNDATION — $37,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMUSEUM ASSOCIATES — $37,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNew York University — $37,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TOLEDO MUSEUM OF ART — $37,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCLEVELAND MUSEUM OF ART — $37,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYale University — $37,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetColonial Williamsburg Foundation — $37,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDENVER ART MUSEUM — $37,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $37,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SOCIETY TO PRESERVE THE MILLVALE MURALS OF MAXO VANKA — $37,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetAmerican Museum of Natural History — $37,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NELSON GALLERY FOUNDATION — $37,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNewfields Inc — $37,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE JOHN & MABLE RINGLING MUSEUM OF ART FOUNDATION INCORPORATED — $37,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetACADEMY FOUNDATION — $37,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO — $37,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MARINERS' MUSEUM — $37,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetWALTERS ART MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC — $32,000 over 1y, 27% of budgetSOCIETY FOR THE PRESERVATION OF NEW ENGL — $32,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS — $32,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSHELBURNE MUSEUM INC — $32,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSOCIETY FOR THE PRESERVATION OF MARYLAND ANTIQUITIES INC — $16,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Terra Foundation for …The Andrew W Mellon F…The J Paul Getty TrustLincoln Financial Fou…Ibm International Fou…T Rowe Price Program …National Philanthropi…Charities Aid Foundat…Morgan Stanley Global…The Bank of America C…The Pfizer Foundation…Vanguard Charitable E…
Terra Foundation for American ArtIL15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Terra Foundation for American Art · The Andrew W Mellon Foundation · The J Paul Getty Trust · Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc · Ibm International Foundation · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Charities Aid Foundation America · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Foundation for Advancement in Conservation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Society for the Preservation of Maryland Antiquities Inc — 50% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
  • Yale University — 12% of income from government
  • Shelburne Museum Inc — 9% of income from government
  • Northeastern University — 7% of income from government
  • Society for the Preservation of New Engl — 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Foundation for Advancement in Conservation?

Find your warmest path to Foundation for Advancement in Conservation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines