Skip to content

Washington, D.C. · Public charity

Foundation for Advancement in Conservation

To undertake and underwrite programs and initiatives to advance the conservation profession in all its facets, to support conservation education and career development, and to apply the expertise of the profession in addressing the nation's artistic, cultural, and historic preservation priorities.

$329k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
7
Itemized grants FY2024
6
Organizations funded FY2023
67%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2024
$199k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2024
$37,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$37,000
Organizations funded a year
4 to 8
FY2018 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
5
Total assets, FY2024
$7.3M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 67% of the organizations Foundation for Advancement in Conservation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 92% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 8% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $148k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23
Arts & CultureEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving6$162k67%
FY20236$161k67%
FY20228$214k50%
FY20218$353k75%
FY20208$292k88%
FY20194$138k75%
FY20184$170kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$701kEnvironment$646kEducation$254k

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
IL
MI
NY
MA
IN
OH
PA
CT
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
SC
DC
TX
FL

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2018 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 32 grantees

Where it is load-bearing

Foundation for Advancement in Conservation supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 1 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 29 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSmithsonian Institution: $190,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNortheastern University: $157,792 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPratt Institute: $96,407 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBalboa Art Conservation Center: $45,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetConservation Center for Art & Historic Artifacts: $43,363 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetThe John & Mable Ringling Museum of Art Foundation Incorporated: $37,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetDenver Art Museum: $37,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Nelson Gallery Foundation: $37,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Mariners' Museum: $37,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetAutry Museum of the American West: $37,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNew York University: $37,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMuseum Associates: $37,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetColonial Williamsburg Foundation: $37,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Art Institute of Chicago: $37,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Toledo Museum of Art: $37,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAcademy Foundation: $37,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNewfields Inc: $37,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Museum of Natural History: $37,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFashion Institute of Technology Foundation: $37,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCleveland Museum of Art: $37,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMissouri Historical Society: $37,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGettysburg Foundation: $37,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe Society to Preserve the Millvale Murals of Maxo Vanka: $37,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetJohns Hopkins University: $37,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWalters Art Museum Foundation Inc: $32,000 over 1y, 27% of budgetSociety for the Preservation of New Engl: $32,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetThe Detroit Institute of Arts: $32,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetShelburne Museum Inc: $32,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSociety for the Preservation of Maryland Antiquities Inc: $16,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 29.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Terra Foundation for American ArtIL15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Terra Foundation for American Art · The Andrew W Mellon Foundation · The J Paul Getty Trust · Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc · Ibm International Foundation · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Charities Aid Foundation America · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Foundation for Advancement in Conservation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Foundation for Advancement in Conservation?

Find your warmest path to Foundation for Advancement in Conservation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Foundation for Advancement in Conservation

How much does Foundation for Advancement in Conservation give?
Foundation for Advancement in Conservation reported 7 itemized grants totaling $199,363, out of $328,777 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 4 and 8 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2023.
What does Foundation for Advancement in Conservation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2018 to FY2024, its largest causes are Arts & Culture (44%), Environment (40%), Education (16%).
Who are Foundation for Advancement in Conservation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2018 to FY2024: Smithsonian Institution ($190k), Northeastern University ($158k), Pratt Institute ($96k).
Does Foundation for Advancement in Conservation fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 67% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Foundation for Advancement in Conservation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Terra Foundation for American Art, The Andrew W Mellon Foundation, The J Paul Getty Trust.
Where is Foundation for Advancement in Conservation based?
Foundation for Advancement in Conservation is based in DC.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Foundation for Advancement in Conservation’s filings →

More from the funding graph