Skip to content

· Private foundation

Florence J Gillmor Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4.7M
Granted FY2025still arriving
32
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$2.2M
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Public Benefit$9.7MCrime & Legal$3.6MHuman Services$2.1MHealth$1.8MHousing & Shelter$1.4MFood & Nutrition$1.3MArts & Culture$1.0MEducation$982kOther$0
02FY2025 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k9 grants · $185k
  • $50k–250k21 grants · $2.0M
  • $250k+2 grants · $2.5M
$75,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$45M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WESTMINSTER$2,200,000
UTAH FOOD BANK$300,000
FOURTH STREET CLINIC$200,000
AND JUSTICE FOR ALL$200,000
THE ROAD HOME$200,000
THE CHILDREN'S CENTER$100,000
YWCA$100,000
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY$100,000
GUADELOUPE SCHOOL$100,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SLC$100,000
ROCKY MOUNTAIN INNOCENCE CENTER$100,000
NATIONAL ABILITY CENTER$100,000
UTAH SYMPHONY & OPERA$100,000
THE NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY$100,000
UNIVERSITY OF UTAH HONORS COLLEGE$75,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $2.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%THE ROAD HOME: $200k → 8%THE ROAD HOME: $200k → 8%THE ROAD HOME: $400k → 8%THE ROAD HOME: $200k → 8%THE ROAD HOME: $200k → 8%THE INN BETWEEN: $50k → 8%THE INN BETWEEN: $50k → 8%THE INN BETWEEN: $25k → 8%UPLIFT COMMUNITY ALLIANCE: $50k → 8%THE INN BETWEEN: $25k → 8%THE INN BETWEEN: $25k → 8%THE INN BETWEEN: $25k → 8%UTAH YOUTH VILLAGE: $30k → 8%UTAH YOUTH VILLAGE: $30k → 8%UTAH YOUTH VILLAGE: $30k → 8%UTAH YOUTH VILLAGE: $30k → 8%UTAH YOUTH VILLAGE: $30k → 8%UTAH YOUTH VILLAGE: $30k → 8%AMERICAN INDIAN SERVICES: $20k → 8%AMERICAN INDIAN SERVICES: $20k → 8%AMERICAN INDIAN SERVICES: $20k → 8%AMERICAN INDIAN SERVICES: $20k → 8%AMERICAN INDIAN SERVICES: $20k → 8%AMERICAN INDIAN SERVICES: $20k → 8%NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $50k → 8%THE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $50k → 8%THE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $50k → 8%NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $50k → 8%NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $50k → 8%NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $50k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 100% of Florence J Gillmor Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in UT; by stated purpose, 0%.

Florence J Gillmor Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$25M · 29 repeat orgs$250k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +53% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

29 repeat relationships: 25 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
5

Total granted

$25M
$250k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
0%

Still filing today

62%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $250k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCrime & LegalHealthCivil RightsArts & CultureRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AJ
    AND JUSTICE FOR ALL
    6× · 2020–2025 · $2.5M · revenue +182% · 26% of their budget
  • UF
    UTAH FOOD BANK
    6× · 2020–2025 · $1.3M · revenue +53%
  • WH
    Wasatch Homeless Health Care
    6× · 2020–2025 · $1.3M · revenue +85%

Funded once

  • TN
    THE NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY
    one grant, 2025 · $100k
  • UC
    UPLIFT COMMUNITY ALLIANCE
    one grant, 2025 · $50k · revenue 0%
  • CS
    Clean Slate Utah
    one grant, 2025 · $50k · revenue -25%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Family Promise - Salt Lake

We help families experiencing homelessness find lasting independence and security.

Housing & Shelter
2
Utah Humanities Council

Utah Humanities collaborates with libraries, museums, historical societies, schools, colleges, and cultural and civic groups; provides capacity-building opportunities for volunteers and professionals in the cultural sector; presents…

Arts & Culture
3
Urban Indian Center of Salt Lake

To serve The People by honoring Native cultures, strengthening health and wellness programs, and cultivating community. We envision all Native peoples living balanced, prosperous, and healthy lives in diverse communities for Seven…

—
4
Utah Donor Collaborative

Democracy Means Equality, Freedom & Justice: It means having a representative government. UDC is here to transform Utah politics and ensure that every voice counts.

—
5
Utah Housing Coalition Inc

The promotion of low-income housing within the state of utah.

—
6
Utah Valley Chamber of Commerce

Stimulate local business establishment, growth, and development by facilitating business to business and business to community relationships throughout Utah County.

—
7
The Center for Economic Opportunity and Belonging

Our mission is to engage with communities and catalyze private, public, and philanthropic partnerships to remedy opportunity gaps in economic opportunity, education, health, and housing in Utah.

Community Improvement
8
Utah Domestic Violence Legal Services

Utah Homicide Survivors provides holistic legal representation to families of homicide victims.

Crime & Legal
9
Utah Legal Services Inc

Our mission at uls is to provide high-quality civil legal aid without cost to people who are unable to afford legal representation or are facing disadvantages, ensuring meaningful access to justice, and promoting education, stability,…

Crime & Legal
10
Utah Regional Housing Corporation

Provide housing to low-income families in provo, utah.

Housing & Shelter
11
Utah Crime Victim Legal Clinic Inc

Provides free legal representation for victims of crime including providing information, support, and advocacy for victims as they go through the criminal justice process.

Human Services
12
Utah Safety Council

The mission of the Utah Safety Council is to save lives by promoting safety and health through education, services, and products.

Public Safety & Disaster
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is And Justice for All; the most unlike its peers is The Nature Conservancy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
18/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WESTMINSTER: $9,700,000 · OtherWESTMINSTERUTAH FOOD BANK: $1,300,000 · OtherUTAH FOOD BANKYWCA: $1,200,000 · OtherYWCAGUADELOUPE SCHOOL: $606,526 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $600,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $600,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SLC: $600,000 · Other+11 more: $2,160,000 · Other+11 moreAND JUSTICE FOR ALL: $2,450,000 · Crime & LegalAND JUSTICE…Peoples Legal Aid: $125,000 · Crime & Legal+1 more: $50,000 · Crime & LegalTHE ROAD HOME: $1,200,000 · Human ServicesTHE ROAD …Neighborhood House Association: $300,000 · Human ServicesNeighborh…THE INN BETWEEN: $200,000 · Human ServicesTHE INN B…UTAH YOUTH VILLAGE: $180,000 · Human ServicesUTAH YOUT…American Indian Services: $120,000 · Human ServicesAmerican …+1 more: $50,000 · Human ServicesWasatch Homeless Health Care: $1,300,000 · HealthRonald McDonald House Charities of the Intermountain Area Inc: $180,000 · Health+1 more: $50,000 · HealthRocky Mountain Innocence Center: $600,000 · Civil RightsUTAH CENTER FOR LEGAL INCLUSION: $350,000 · Civil RightsUTAH SYMPHONY & OPERA: $500,000 · Arts & CultureBALLET WEST: $425,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL ABILITY CENTER: $600,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$16,766,526Crime & Legal$2,625,000Human Services$2,050,000Health$1,530,000Civil Rights$950,000Arts & Culture$925,000Recreation & Sports$600,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAND JUSTICE FOR ALL: $2,450,000 over 6y, 26% of budgetUTAH FOOD BANK: $1,300,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetWasatch Homeless Health Care: $1,300,000 over 6y, 2.6% of budgetTHE ROAD HOME: $1,200,000 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetNATIONAL ABILITY CENTER: $600,000 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $600,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetRocky Mountain Innocence Center: $600,000 over 6y, 22% of budgetUTAH SYMPHONY & OPERA: $500,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S CENTER UTAH: $475,000 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetBALLET WEST: $425,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetUTAH CENTER FOR LEGAL INCLUSION: $350,000 over 6y, 40% of budgetNeighborhood House Association: $300,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF UTAH: $275,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetTHE INN BETWEEN: $200,000 over 6y, 2.6% of budgetRonald McDonald House Charities of the Intermountain Area Inc: $180,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetUTAH YOUTH VILLAGE: $180,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetPeoples Legal Aid: $125,000 over 3y, 17% of budgetAmerican Indian Services: $120,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetMaliheh Free Clinic: $50,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetUPLIFT COMMUNITY ALLIANCE: $50,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetUTAH CLEAN ENERGY ALLIANCE INC: $35,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AND JUSTICE FOR ALL ↗
  • Who funds UTAH FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds Wasatch Homeless Health Care ↗
  • Who funds THE ROAD HOME ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ABILITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds Rocky Mountain Innocence Center ↗
  • Who funds UTAH SYMPHONY & OPERA ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S CENTER UTAH ↗
  • Who funds BALLET WEST ↗
  • Who funds UTAH CENTER FOR LEGAL INCLUSION ↗
  • Who funds Neighborhood House Association ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF UTAH ↗
  • Who funds THE INN BETWEEN ↗
  • Who funds Ronald McDonald House Charities of the Intermountain Area Inc ↗
  • Who funds UTAH YOUTH VILLAGE ↗
  • Who funds Peoples Legal Aid ↗
  • Who funds American Indian Services ↗
  • Who funds Maliheh Free Clinic ↗
  • Who funds UPLIFT COMMUNITY ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds Clean Slate Utah ↗
  • Who funds UTAH CLEAN ENERGY ALLIANCE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

George S and Dolores Dore Eccles FoundationUT24× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: George S and Dolores Dore Eccles Foundation · Sorenson Legacy Foundation · The Community Foundation of Utah · Lawrence & Janet Dee Foundation · Larry H Miller and Gail Miller Family Foundation · Herbert I & Elsa B Michael Foundation US Bank National Association · Katherine W Dumke & Ezekiel R Dumke Jr Foundation · The Archer Family Charitable Corp · Marriner S Eccles Foundation · Intermountain Community Care Foundation Inc · David Kelby Johnson Memorial Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Florence J Gillmor Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Florence J Gillmor Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Florence J Gillmor Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Florence J Gillmor Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Florence J Gillmor’s filings →

    More from the funding graph