How much did FIELD HALL FOUNDATION grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 64% of FIELD HALL FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

expand seniorcomputerscholarships adultcare respiterespite eligibleseniors caregiverscaregivers westchester

2020

covid emergencyemergency reliefrelief personalpersonal protectionprotection equipmentholiday foodrelief food

2021

skillsseniors unabledeliveredfood foodevictionnursingsenior clients

2022

trainingbreastattendinjury unitnutritious foodputnam elderabuse multidisciplinary

2023

food transportationlow-income dutchessmedical equipmentequipment suppliesaddress foodvouchersdeliver nutritious

2024

feeding westchester'swestchester's hungrymeals wheelsred hookaging placewestchesterolder adults

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 53 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k14 grants · $29k
$10k–50k39 grants · $771k

$15,000

Median grant

States reached

$25M

Total assets

Largest grants

WESTCHESTER JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES INC$40,000
COVECARE CENTER$40,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES COMMUNITY SERVICES OF DUTCHESS INC$40,000
STEM ALLIANCE$30,000
PEOPLE INC$30,000
WESTCHESTER RESIDENTIAL OPPORTUNITIES INC$30,000
CORNELL COOPERATIVE EXTENSION DUTCHESS COUNTY$30,000
THE LOFT LGBTQ COMMUNITY CENTER INC$30,000
COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP FOR DUTCHESS COUNTY INC$30,000
THE BRIDGE FUNDS$25,000
PORT CHESTER CARVER CENTER INC$25,000
HUDSON RIVER HOUSING INC$25,000
DUTCHESS COUNTY OFFICE OF AGING$25,000
PHELPS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL$20,000
NORTH EAST COMMUNITY CENTER INC$20,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $445k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9% — the area typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 9% of FIELD HALL FOUNDATION’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 99% of the giving stays in NY; read by stated purpose it is 90% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

FIELD HALL FOUNDATIONlessmore of its giving

Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

45%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$2.0M · 50 repeat orgs$2.4M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +29% for the ones you funded once.

50 repeat relationships — 29 still active in FY2024, 21 since wound down; 24 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$2.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%

+29%

Still filing today

70%

40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 40% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $481k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionArts & CultureHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

WJ
WESTCHESTER JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES INC
3× · 2019–2024 · $140k · revenue +35%
CC
CATHOLIC CHARITIES COMMUNITY SERVICES ARCHDIOCESE OF NEW YORK
4× · 2019–2023 · $140k · revenue +71%
HR
HUDSON RIVER HOUSING INC
3× · 2020–2024 · $110k · revenue +92%

Funded once

VF
VISIONSSERVICES FOR BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED
one grant, 2021 · $75k
WP
WESTCHESTER PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP FUND FOR AGING SERVICES INC
one grant, 2019 · $75k
TO
TOWN OF YORKTOWN
one grant, 2019 · $65k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Home Health Services of Wjcs Inc

Home health services of wjcs is a ny state licensed home care service agency, hhs provides the highest quality services supporting older adults in aging in place while maintaining independence and preserving their dignity.

—

Apropos Housing Opportunities and Mgmt

A-home provides safe and affordable housing in northern westchester county, new york.

Housing & Shelter

Community Programs of Westchester

Community programs operates 13 group homes for 95 adults who have intellectual and developmental deficits that require 24/7 care to enable them to be as independent and functional members of the community as possible. various support…

—

West Side Center for Community Life

To support community life through alleviation of hunger by ensuring that all new yorkers have access to healthy food and supportive services.

Youth Development

The Way Back Inc

To provide rehabilitative housing services and support to help people with psychiatric disabilities reintegrate into the community.

Human Services

The County Chamber of Commerce

The business council of westchester's mission is to work hard to grow the economy, create jobs and build a strong business community in westchester county.

—

Westchester Publicprivate

The organization develops resources to provide services to seniors in westchester county, new york.

Human Services

Westchester County Habitat for Humanity

Westchester county habitat for humanity transforms lives and communities by building and preserving affordable homes with families in need, and by uniting all new yorkers around the cause of affordable housing.

Housing & Shelter

Wraparound Services of the Hudson

Wraparound services of the hudson valley partners with communities throughout the mid-hudson valley to empower people with disabilities to achieve their highest potential by providing innovative community, educational and residential…

Health

Home Care Association of New York

To promote and enhance the quality and accesibility of health care and support at home.

Community Improvement

Woodland Pond Inc

Operate a continuing care retirement community under article 46 of ny state public health law

Housing & Shelter

Wmc-New York Inc

Engages in activities that further support, benefit, and carryout the purposes, missions, objectives, and activities of westchester county health care corp.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hope Community Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is Hudson River Housing Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/80

the rest of the field

724/8,317

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

06the grantee network

76 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

76/76

Grantees still filing

61/76

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$2,950,331Health$531,561Human Services$444,600Food & Nutrition$294,100Housing & Shelter$105,250Recreation & Sports$51,500Arts & Culture$50,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Westchester and PutnamNY61.6× affinity27 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Westchester and Putnam · Community Foundations of the Hudson · Pcsb Community Foundation · The Thomas and Agnes Carvel Foundation · Mbia Foundation · The Dyson Foundation · The New York Community Trust · Phelps Community Foundation Inc · Mother Cabrini Health Foundation Inc · Impact100 Westchester Inc · Webster Bank Charitable Foundation · Td Charitable Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation FIELD HALL FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: MEALS ON WHEELS OF GREATER POUGHKEEPSIE.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +73% since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 141538305 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on MEALS ON WHEELS OF GREATER POUGHKEEPSIE, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 12% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Field Hall Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Field Hall Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

FIELD HALL FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

76 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Field Hall Foundation?

More from the funding graph

FIELD HALL FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

76 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Field Hall Foundation?

More from the funding graph