Skip to content
Familycare Inc at a glance

· Public charity

Familycare Inc

To provide programs of cooperative and comprehensive healthcare to the community.

$6.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$5.7M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$25MPhilanthropy$5.7MFood & Nutrition$835kYouth Development$597kEducation$573kArts & Culture$314kHuman Services$292kCivil Rights$216kOther$0
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $230k
  • $250k+1 grant · $5.7M
$12,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$109M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE HEATHERINGTON FOUNDATION$5,740,480
MUSLIM EDUCATIONAL TRUST$30,000
OREGON HISTORICAL SOCIETY$25,000
ASIAN HEALTH & SERVICE CENTER$25,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER SANTIAM$21,600
MAURICE LUCAS FOUNDATION$19,208
BLANCHET HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY$15,000
WESTERN UNIVERSITY COMPNW$12,500
OREGON SYMPHONY$12,000
NEW NARRATIVE PDX$10,000
UNITED FEDERAL OF OSTEOPATHIC SCIENCES$10,000
THE LUND REPORT$10,000
PROJECT ACCESS NOW$10,000
CASCADIA HEALTH$10,000
PSU FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $408k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ADELANTE MUJERES: $12k → 8%NEW NARRATIVE PDX: $10k → 8%URBAN LEAGUEOF PORTLAND: $160k → 12%LATINO NETWORK: $150k → 12%LATINO NETWORK: $46k → 12%LATINO NETWORK: $10k → 12%LATINO NETWORK: $10k → 12%LATINO NETWORK: $10k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$28M · 17 repeat orgs$6.0M to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
40

Total granted

$28M
$6.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+73%

Still filing today

82%
65%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $48k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionEducationArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE GREATER SANTIAM
    3× · 2020–2024 · $332k · revenue +11%
  • LIFEWORKS NW
    5× · 2017–2023 · $294k · revenue +39%
  • Latino Network
    5× · 2017–2024 · $226k · revenue +306%

Funded once

  • WILLAMETTE UNIVERSITYgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $3.0M · revenue +37%
  • AO
    AMERICAN OSTEOPATHIC FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $1.0M · revenue +0% · 37% of their budget
  • MEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC
    one grant, 2020 · $250k · revenue +10%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Oregon Public Health Association

Advocate for policies that protect and promote healthy and health equity for all people in oregon and provide learning, collaboration and leadership opportunities for public health professionals and the broader community.

Health
2
Careoregon Inc

To inspire and partner to create quality and equity in individual and community health.

Health
3
The Wallace Medical Concern

We partner with our community to make good health possible for all. wallace serves individuals and families who face barriers to care throughout the east multnomah county in the portland metropolitan area.

—
4
Portland Street Medicine

We offer our homeless neighbors accessible whole-person care to improve and support health, and to bridge a gap in trust between people and systems.

Health
5
Sea Mar Community Health Centers

Sea mar community health centers is a community-based organization committed to providing quality, comprehensive health, human, housing, educational, and cultural services to diverse communities, specializing in service to latinos.

Health
6
Oregon Energy Systems Technology and Research
Environment
7
Eastern Oregon Health and Wellness Inc

Eastern oregon health & wellness provides recovery housing and outpatient services that support individuals and families impacted by substance use disorder through safe housing, trauma-informed care, and community-based support.

Health
8
Oregon Medical Association

The mission of the oma is to speak as the unified voice of medicine in oregon; advocate for a sustainable, equitable, and accessible healthcare environment; and energize physicians and physician assistants by building and supporting their…

—
9
Coalition of Community Health Clinics

The mission of the coalition of community health clinics is to improve healthcare for vulnerable populations residing in the portland-metro area. we strengthen community clinics, promote health equity, and foster collaboration across the…

Health
10
Trillium Family Services

Building brighter futures with children and families.

Housing & Shelter
11
Iaf Northwest

In 2024, IAF Pacific continued its work of connecting and strengthening broad-based alliances throughout the Pacific region.Through its Building Partnerships for Collaborative Action initiativethe organization supported Indigenous and…

Community Improvement
12
Impact Nw

Impact nw prevents homelessness by supporting people as they navigate their journey to stability and strength. founded in portland in 1966, impact nw now serves 26,944 people a year in the greater portland, oregon metro area, including…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lifeworks Nw; the most unlike its peers is Heatherington Foundation for Innovation and Education in Health Care. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

45 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 45 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
43/45
Grantees still filing
38/45
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HEATHERINGTON FOUNDATION FOR INNOVATION AND EDUCATION IN HEALTH CARE: $25,740,480 · HealthHEATHERINGTON FOUNDATION FOR INNOVATION AND EDUCATION IN HEALTH CARE+12 more: $980,114 · HealthWILLAMETTE UNIVERSITY: $3,000,000 · EducationWILLAMETTE…KAIROSPDX: $150,000 · EducationAMERICAN OSTEOPATHIC FOUNDATION: $1,025,000 · OtherGLADSTONE SCHOOL DISTRICT #115: $255,000 · OtherSELF ENHANCEMENT INC: $160,000 · OtherOREGON FOOD BANK: $157,000 · OtherNORTHWEST FAMILY SERVICES: $115,025 · OtherMUSLIM EDUCATIONAL TRUST INC: $93,000 · Other+28 more: $748,606 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE GREATER SANTIAM: $331,600 · Youth DevelopmentMAURICE LUCAS FOUNDATION: $99,208 · Youth DevelopmentNATIVE AMERICAN YOUTH AND FAMILY CENTER: $80,000 · Youth DevelopmentLatino Network: $225,830 · Human ServicesURBAN LEAGUE OF PORTLAND INC: $160,000 · Human ServicesBENTON FURNITURE SHARE: $20,000 · Human Services+2 more: $22,137 · Human ServicesMEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC: $250,000 · Food & NutritionPortland Backpack: $40,000 · Food & NutritionLEBANON SOUP KITCHEN: $37,500 · Food & NutritionOREGON SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION: $159,000 · Arts & CultureOREGON HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $105,000 · Arts & Culture
Health$26,720,594Education$3,150,000Other$2,553,631Youth Development$510,808Human Services$427,967Food & Nutrition$327,500Arts & Culture$264,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHEATHERINGTON FOUNDATION FOR INNOVATION AND EDUCATION IN HEALTH CARE: $25,740,480 over 2y, 95% of budgetWILLAMETTE UNIVERSITY: $3,000,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetAMERICAN OSTEOPATHIC FOUNDATION: $1,025,000 over 1y, 37% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE GREATER SANTIAM: $331,600 over 3y, 13% of budgetLIFEWORKS NW: $293,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC: $250,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetLatino Network: $225,830 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetASIAN HEALTH & SERVICE CENTER INC: $215,101 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetSELF ENHANCEMENT INC: $160,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetURBAN LEAGUE OF PORTLAND INC: $160,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetOREGON SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION: $159,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetOREGON FOOD BANK: $157,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetKAIROSPDX: $150,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetNORTHWEST FAMILY SERVICES: $115,025 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetOREGON HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $105,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetMAURICE LUCAS FOUNDATION: $99,208 over 3y, 6.6% of budgetProject Access Now: $90,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetYes for Clackamas Kids: $85,000 over 1y, 41% of budgetNATIVE AMERICAN YOUTH AND FAMILY CENTER: $80,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCASCADE AIDS PROJECT: $80,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetSpecial Olympics Oregon Inc: $70,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetYAKIMA VALLEY FARM WORKERS CLINIC: $67,303 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN OSTEOPATHIC ASSOCIATION: $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRANDALL CHILDRENS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetNATIVE AMERICAN REHABILITATION ASSOCIATION OF THE NORTHWEST INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPHAME ACADEMY: $50,000 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetVerde Inc: $40,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetPortland Backpack: $40,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetLEBANON SOUP KITCHEN: $37,500 over 2y, 18% of budgetCentral City Concern: $34,210 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOSTEOPATHIC PHYSICIANS & SURGEONS OF OREGON: $25,000 over 1y, 7.2% of budgetThe Lund Report: $25,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetBLANCHET HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY: $20,100 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSKANNER FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetBENTON FURNITURE SHARE: $20,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetNORTH BY NORTHEAST COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $15,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetADELANTE MUJERES: $12,137 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNEW NARRATIVE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFamilias en Accion: $10,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetWESTERN UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCASCADIA HEALTH: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Meyer Memorial TrustCareoregon IncThe Oregon Community …OCF Joseph E Weston P…The Collins FoundationMarie Lamfrom Charita…Heatherington Foundat…Providence Health & S…The Harold & Arlene S…United Way of the Col…Kaiser Foundation Hos…Health Share of Oregon
Meyer Memorial TrustOR49.8× affinity23 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Meyer Memorial Trust · Careoregon Inc · The Oregon Community Foundation · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · The Collins Foundation · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · Heatherington Foundation for Innovation and Education in Health Care · Providence Health & Services - Oregon · The Harold & Arlene Schnitzer Care Foundation · United Way of the Columbia-Willamette · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Health Share of Oregon

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Familycare Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Familycare Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • The Intertwine Alliance Foundation: 47% of income from government
  • Northwest Family Services: 35% of income from government
  • Urban League of Portland Inc: 33% of income from government
  • Adelante Mujeres: 31% of income from government
  • Native American Youth and Family Center: 23% of income from government
  • Oregon Food Bank: 21% of income from government
  • Kairospdx: 19% of income from government
  • Asian Health & Service Center Inc: 18% of income from government
  • Native American Rehabilitation Association of the Northwest Inc: 16% of income from government
  • Latino Network: 15% of income from government
  • Self Enhancement Inc: 14% of income from government
  • Boys & Girls Clubs of the Greater Santiam: 14% of income from government
  • Cascade Aids Project: 13% of income from government
  • Oregon Historical Society: 10% of income from government
  • Central City Concern: 10% of income from government
  • Lifeworks Nw: 8% of income from government
  • Familias en Accion: 8% of income from government
  • Skanner Foundation: 8% of income from government
  • New Narrative: 6% of income from government
  • North By Northeast Community Health Center: 4% of income from government
  • Verde Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Cascadia Health: 3% of income from government
  • Project Access Now: 2% of income from government
  • Willamette University: 1% of income from government
  • Phame Academy: 0% of income from government
  • Oregon Symphony Association: 0% of income from government
  • The Lund Report: 0% of income from government
  • Randall Childrens Hospital Foundation: 0% of income from government
  • Portland State University Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 62 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Familycare’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home