· Private foundation
Heatherington Foundation for Innovation and Education in Health Care
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 72% of HEATHERINGTON FOUNDATION FOR INNOVATION AND EDUCATION IN HEALTH CARE’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $3k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $150k
- $50k–250k19 grants · $1.9M
- $250k+11 grants · $10M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WESTERN UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES | $6,495,000 |
| AMERICAN OSTEOPATHIC FOUNDATION | $1,030,075 |
| CENTENNIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT | $500,000 |
| LAO BUDDHIST CENTER NORTHWEST INC | $350,000 |
| CLACKAMAS VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE | $300,000 |
| FAMILY TREE RELIEF NURSERY | $250,000 |
| THE LUND REPORT | $250,000 |
| BLANCHET HOUSE | $250,000 |
| SERENDIPTY CENTER | $250,000 |
| RIVER CENTER CARING TEAM MINISTRY | $250,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER SANTIAM | $250,000 |
| MUSLIM EDUCATIONAL TRUST | $160,000 |
| MAURICE LUCAS FOUNDATION | $160,000 |
| VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA OR | $150,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $104,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $2.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.
25 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.3M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
WILLAMETTE UNIVERSITY2× · 2019–2024 · $3.0M · revenue +37%
BLANCHET HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY2× · 2021–2024 · $1.8M · revenue +4%
Latino Network2× · 2021–2023 · $1.4M · revenue +75%
Funded once
MEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INCone grant, 2021 · $1.3M · revenue -24%
KAIROSPDXone grant, 2021 · $792k · revenue +4%- VIVOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE OF CLACKAMAS COUNTYone grant, 2021 · $700k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To inspire and partner to create quality and equity in individual and community health.
Children's institute's mission is to leverage research, practice, policy, and advocacy to shift systems toward justice for families so that all of oregon's children, prenatal to grade 5, have access to opportunity.
Building brighter futures with children and families.
Center for intercultural organizing dba unite oregon is a diverse, grassroots organization working to build a multicultural movement for immigrant and refugee rights through education, civic engagement, community organizing and…
In 2024, IAF Pacific continued its work of connecting and strengthening broad-based alliances throughout the Pacific region.Through its Building Partnerships for Collaborative Action initiativethe organization supported Indigenous and…
Advocate for policies that protect and promote healthy and health equity for all people in oregon and provide learning, collaboration and leadership opportunities for public health professionals and the broader community.
Sea mar community health centers is a community-based organization committed to providing quality, comprehensive health, human, housing, educational, and cultural services to diverse communities, specializing in service to latinos.
We promote well-being and advance equity by providing inclusive health and wellness services for lgbtq+ people, people affected by hiv, and all those seeking compassionate care.
We offer our homeless neighbors accessible whole-person care to improve and support health, and to bridge a gap in trust between people and systems.
Eastern oregon health & wellness provides recovery housing and outpatient services that support individuals and families impacted by substance use disorder through safe housing, trauma-informed care, and community-based support.
Supporting individuals living with hiv/aids and preventing new hiv infections.
Impact nw prevents homelessness by supporting people as they navigate their journey to stability and strength. founded in portland in 1966, impact nw now serves 26,944 people a year in the greater portland, oregon metro area, including…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lifeworks Nw and the most unlike its peers is Benton Furniture Share. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 43 of the 73 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WILLAMETTE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds BLANCHET HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY ↗
- Who funds Latino Network ↗
- Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN OSTEOPATHIC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LEBANON COMMUNITY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds The Lund Report ↗
- Who funds KAIROSPDX ↗
- Who funds BUILD LEBANON TRAILS ↗
- Who funds APANO ↗
- Who funds OREGON SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds OSTEOPATHIC PHYSICIANS & SURGEONS OF OREGON ↗
- Who funds SERENDIPITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds MAURICE LUCAS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BELONG ART COMMUNITY ↗
- Who funds PORTLAND OPPORTUNITIES INDUST CENTER ↗
- Who funds LAO BUDDHIST CENTER NW INC ↗
- Who funds CLACKAMAS VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE ↗
- Who funds NATIVE AMERICAN YOUTH AND FAMILY CENTER ↗
- Who funds ASIAN HEALTH & SERVICE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds OUTSIDE IN ↗
- Who funds HACIENDA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds CASCADIA HEALTH ↗
- Who funds FAMILY TREE RELIEF NURSERY ↗
- Who funds URBAN LEAGUE OF PORTLAND INC ↗
- Who funds VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA OF OREGON INC ↗
- Who funds COALITION OF COMMUNITIES OF COLOR ↗
- Who funds SELF ENHANCEMENT INC ↗
- Who funds IMAGINE BLACK FUTURES ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Collins Foundation · The Oregon Community Foundation · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · Meyer Memorial Trust · Careoregon Inc · Familycare Inc · Providence Health & Services - Oregon · Northwest Health Foundation Fund II · Seeding Justice · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Juan Young Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Heatherington Foundation for Innovation and Education in Health Care funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Foundation for Medical Excellence — 66% of income from government
- Family Tree Relief Nursery — 57% of income from government
- Hacienda Community Development Corporation — 48% of income from government
- Black Parent Initiative — 45% of income from government
- Portland Opportunities Indust Center — 38% of income from government
- Outside in — 33% of income from government
- Urban League of Portland Inc — 33% of income from government
- Native American Youth and Family Center — 23% of income from government
- Kairospdx — 19% of income from government
- Asian Health & Service Center Inc — 18% of income from government
- Latino Network — 15% of income from government
- Holla School — 15% of income from government
- Coalition of Communities of Color — 15% of income from government
- Self Enhancement Inc — 14% of income from government
- Lifeworks Nw — 8% of income from government
- Clackamas Volunteers in Medicine — 7% of income from government
- Parenting With Intent — 7% of income from government
- The Immigrant and Refugee Community Organization — 4% of income from government
- Cascadia Health — 3% of income from government
- Serendipity Center Inc — 2% of income from government
- Project Access Now — 2% of income from government
- Willamette University — 1% of income from government
- Portland Youth Philharmonic Association — 0% of income from government
- All Classical Public Media Inc — 0% of income from government
- Oregon Symphony Association — 0% of income from government
- The Lund Report — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Heatherington Foundation for Innovation and Education in Health Care?
Find your warmest path to Heatherington Foundation for Innovation and Education in Health Care through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.