Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Health Share of Oregon

The charitable purposes of the organization include, but are not limited to, developing an integrated community health system that achieves better care, better health, and lower costs for the medicaid population and the tri-county community of multnomah, washington, and clackamas counties, oregon (the "tri-county area").

$11M
Granted FY2024still arriving
41
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$1.3M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 41 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $42k
  • $50k–250k31 grants · $4.0M
  • $250k+9 grants · $6.9M
$165,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$364M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CLACKAMAS COUNTY HEALTH CENTERS$1,344,306
HOME FORWARD$1,054,079
WASHINGTON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING SERVICES$1,010,165
MULTNOMAH COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT$935,702
211INFO$750,000
PROJECT ACCESS NOW$750,000
NORTHWEST FAMILY SERVICES$482,533
CLACKAMAS WOMEN'S SERVICES$323,000
NATIVE AMERICAN REHABILITATION ASSOCIATION OF THE NORTHWEST INC$252,041
BIENESTAR$245,450
LATINO NETWORK$243,685
CASCADE AIDS PROJECT$214,208
SEQUOIA MENTAL HEALTH INC$211,506
MEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC$210,000
UNITED WAY OF THE COLUMBIA-WILLAMETTE$200,000
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $1.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 59% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CLACKAMAS WOMEN'S SERVICES: $323k → 8%COMMUNITY ACTION ORGANIZATION: $200k → 8%COMMUNITY ACTION ORGANIZATION: $51k → 8%ADELANTE MUJERES: $165k → 8%NEW NARRATIVE: $150k → 8%NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE INC: $100k → 12%LATINO NETWORK: $244k → 12%OREGON HUMAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $100k → 12%BRIDGE-PAMOJA: $50k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Urban League of Portland Inc

To help empower african americans and others achieve equality in education, employment, and economic security.

Human Services
2
Cultivate Initiatives

The organization collectively works alongside those on the margins to empower individuals and communities through an inclusive range of services and support in east portland.

Housing & Shelter
3
Welcome Home Coalition

Welcome Home is a diverse coalition in the Portland metropolitan region that uses its collective resources to create healthy communities by ensuring everyone has an affordable and stable home. We use community education and collaboration…

Community Improvement
4
Ywca of Greater Portland

To eliminate racism, empower women and promote peace, justice, freedom and dignity for all.

Human Services
5
Northwest Housing Alternatives

Northwest housing alternatives (nha)s mission is to create opportunity through housing. nha develops, builds, and manages affordable rental housing for families, seniors, and people with disabilities across oregon. these homes help…

Housing & Shelter
6
Coalition of Community Health Clinics

The mission of the coalition of community health clinics is to improve healthcare for vulnerable populations residing in the portland-metro area. we strengthen community clinics, promote health equity, and foster collaboration across the…

Health
7
Cascadia Health

Cascadia health delivers whole health care - integrated mental health and addiction services, primary care, and housing - to support our communities and provide hope and well-being for those we serve.

Health
8
Parenting With Intent

Building strong connections for healthy communities through mental health programs, youth empowerment services and family services.

Human Services
9
Eastern Oregon Health and Wellness Inc

Eastern oregon health & wellness provides recovery housing and outpatient services that support individuals and families impacted by substance use disorder through safe housing, trauma-informed care, and community-based support.

Health
10
Clackamas Service Center

Clackamas service center is an inclusive, "one-stop" community center for individuals and families seeking food relief and resources for improved health, dignity, and stability.

Human Services
11
Chicago House & Social Service Agency

Provides housing and support services to individuals and families impacted by hiv/aids

Health
12
Healthright 360

To give hope and change lives. we do this by offering a continuum of prevention, intervention, behavioral health and wellness services to adults and families throughout california. these services aim to reduce costs of societal problems by…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Project Access Now and the most unlike its peers is Bridge Pomoja. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyYouth & Family Support Serv…Community Health ClinicsDisability Employment & Sup…Black Community DevelopmentProfessional Trade Associat…Alternative Pedagogy Schools
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number23%6%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%16%10–20yr19%25%20–35yr12%38%35–55yr14%13%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value23%3%<5yr14%1%5–10yr19%19%10–20yr19%19%20–35yr12%49%35–55yr14%10%55yr+

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/39
the rest of the field
13%
1,008/7,923

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

03the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/33
Grantees still filing
16/33
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CLACKAMAS COUNTY HEALTH CENTERS — $1,344,306 · OtherCLACKAMAS COUNTY HEALTH CENTERSHOME FORWARD — $1,054,079 · OtherHOME FORWARDWashington County Oregon — $1,010,165 · OtherWashington County OregonMultnomah County Joint Office of Homeless Services — $935,702 · OtherMultnomah County Joint Office of Homeless ServicesNORTHWEST FAMILY SERVICES — $524,033 · OtherNORTHWEST FAMILY SERVICES+9 more — $846,062 · Other+9 more211INFO — $750,000 · Health211INFOProject Access Now — $750,000 · HealthProject Access NowNATIVE AMERICAN REHABILITATION ASSOCIATION OF THE NORTHWEST INC — $252,041 · HealthNATIVE AMERICAN REHABIL…CASCADE AIDS PROJECT — $214,208 · HealthCASCADE AIDS PROJECTCentral City Concern — $170,499 · HealthCentral City ConcernASIAN HEALTH & SERVICE CENTER INC — $86,400 · HealthCLACKAMAS WOMEN'S SERVICES — $323,000 · Human ServicesCLACKAMAS WOMEN'…COMMUNITY ACTION ORGANIZATION — $250,527 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY ACTION…Latino Network — $243,685 · Human ServicesLatino NetworkPROJECT QUEST — $165,000 · Human ServicesPROJECT QUESTADELANTE MUJERES — $164,636 · Human ServicesADELANTE MUJERESNEW NARRATIVE — $150,000 · Human ServicesNEW NARRATIVENEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE INC — $100,000 · Human ServicesNEIGHBORHOOD HOU…OREGON HUMAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $100,000 · Human ServicesOREGON HUMAN DEV…+1 more — $50,000 · Human ServicesBIENESTAR INC — $245,450 · Housing & ShelterSEQUOIA MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES INC — $211,506 · Housing & ShelterPATH HOME — $180,018 · Housing & ShelterMEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC — $210,000 · Food & NutritionFEED EM FREEDOM — $100,000 · Food & NutritionFeed The Mass — $100,000 · Food & NutritionUnited Way of the Columbia-Willamette — $200,000 · PhilanthropyOREGON CHINESE COALITION — $50,000 · PhilanthropyFamilias en Accion — $100,000 · Crime & LegalRed Lodge Transition Services — $50,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$5,714,347Health$2,223,148Human Services$1,546,848Housing & Shelter$636,974Food & Nutrition$410,000Philanthropy$250,000Crime & Legal$150,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budget211INFO — $750,000 over 1y, 7.6% of budgetProject Access Now — $750,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetNORTHWEST FAMILY SERVICES — $524,033 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetCLACKAMAS WOMEN'S SERVICES — $323,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetNATIVE AMERICAN REHABILITATION ASSOCIATION OF THE NORTHWEST INC — $252,041 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION ORGANIZATION — $250,527 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBIENESTAR INC — $245,450 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetLatino Network — $243,685 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCASCADE AIDS PROJECT — $214,208 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSEQUOIA MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES INC — $211,506 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC — $210,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetUnited Way of the Columbia-Willamette — $200,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION — $190,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPATH HOME — $180,018 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetCentral City Concern — $170,499 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT QUEST — $165,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetADELANTE MUJERES — $164,636 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetNEW NARRATIVE — $150,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFamilias en Accion — $100,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetFeed The Mass — $100,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetOREGON HUMAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $100,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetPORTLAND OPPORTUNITIES INDUST CENTER — $100,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetOREGON AND SW WASHINGTON AFRICAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER — $100,000 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetASIAN HEALTH & SERVICE CENTER INC — $86,400 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF OREGON — $75,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetNAMI MULTNOMAH — $63,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetBRIDGE POMOJA — $50,000 over 1y, 9.2% of budgetOREGON CHINESE COALITION — $50,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetCENTRO CULTURAL OF WASHINGTON COUNTY — $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF ZENGER FARM — $50,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetRed Lodge Transition Services — $50,000 over 1y, 11% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community …Careoregon IncThe Collins FoundationMeyer Memorial TrustUnited Way of the Col…OCF Joseph E Weston P…Kaiser Foundation Hos…Marie Lamfrom Charita…Providence Health & S…Seeding JusticeWorksystems IncThe Harold & Arlene S…
The Oregon Community FoundationOR53.5× affinity30 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · Careoregon Inc · The Collins Foundation · Meyer Memorial Trust · United Way of the Columbia-Willamette · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · Providence Health & Services - Oregon · Seeding Justice · Worksystems Inc · The Harold & Arlene Schnitzer Care Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Health Share of Oregon funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 16%
  • Community Action Organization — 67% of income from government
  • 211INFO — 60% of income from government
  • Neighborhood House Inc — 53% of income from government
  • Oregon Chinese Coalition — 41% of income from government
  • Oregon Human Development Corporation — 40% of income from government
  • Portland Opportunities Indust Center — 38% of income from government
  • Northwest Family Services — 35% of income from government
  • Clackamas Women's Services — 33% of income from government
  • Adelante Mujeres — 31% of income from government
  • Friends of Zenger Farm — 28% of income from government
  • United Way of the Columbia-Willamette — 25% of income from government
  • Asian Health & Service Center Inc — 18% of income from government
  • Nami Multnomah — 16% of income from government
  • Native American Rehabilitation Association of the Northwest Inc — 16% of income from government
  • Latino Network — 15% of income from government
  • Cascade Aids Project — 13% of income from government
  • Red Lodge Transition Services — 12% of income from government
  • Sequoia Mental Health Services Inc — 12% of income from government
  • Central City Concern — 10% of income from government
  • Familias en Accion — 8% of income from government
  • Bienestar Inc — 8% of income from government
  • Community Development Corporation of Oregon — 7% of income from government
  • New Narrative — 6% of income from government
  • The Immigrant and Refugee Community Organization — 4% of income from government
  • Project Access Now — 2% of income from government
  • Centro Cultural of Washington County — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
3rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home