Skip to content
Ewomennetwork Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Ewomennetwork Foundation

The organization's mission is to support not-for-profit health, wellness, and safety initiatives that help underpriviledged women throughout the world meet their challenges to cope, grow, and heal.

$106k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$90kHuman Services$78kYouth Development$56kArts & Culture$18kEducation$18kCrime & Legal$18kInternational$12kEmployment$12kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 12 grants below total $72,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $106,336 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $34,336 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$6,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$100k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BACKPACK SOCIETY$6,000
MAKE MENTAL HEALTH MATTER$6,000
THE OVARIAN CANCER CIRCLE$6,000
JACKIE'S WAR$6,000
GIGI'S PLAYHOUSE SAN DIEGO$6,000
BROKEN ARROW WRANGLERS$6,000
THE SINGLETONS$6,000
THE DIGNITY PROJECT DBA WELL GROUNDED COFFEE COMMUNITY$6,000
SOUTHERN NEVADA CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER$6,000
UNIFORMS FOR HOPE$6,000
SOUTHERN COLORADO CONSTRUCTION CAREER DAYS FOUNDATION$6,000
THE TINY MIRACLES FOUNDATION$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $98k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 69% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%YOUNG LADIES OF OUR FUTURE INC: $26k → 20%MY SISTERS CLOSET OF MARYLAND: $6k → 14%STEPS INC: $6k → 9%YANAM2M: $6k → 3%CLOTHES TO KIDS OF DENVER: $6k → 12%SOUTHERN NEVADA CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $6k → 13%OCJ KIDS: $6k → 11%RAISING HOPE: $6k → 10%WISEPLACE: $6k → 10%THE SINGLETONS: $6k → 11%JAMES RESOURCE NETWORK: $6k → 12%KID'S MOBILITY NETWORK: $6k → 8%HEARTSPACE KIDS INC: $6k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
NY
OR
NV
CT
RI
CA
CO
VA
MD
AZ
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 21% of Ewomennetwork Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 5% of the giving stays in TX; by stated purpose, 22%.

Ewomennetwork Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 5.1% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Colorado Wellness Center for Girls
—
2
Blessings Working Together Inc

Provide counseling and life skills

Human Services
3
Cornerstone Connections

The mission of Cornerstone Connections is to connect and provide individuals and families with quality resources, services, trainings, and support that will foster them into leading viable lives.

—
4
Building U

Educating and supporting young people to manage money effectively so that they can become financially stable, build assets and achieve their personal and entrepreneurial goals

Community Improvement
5
Dress for Success Sacramento

Dress for Success Sacramento is an affiliate of Dress for Success Worldwide a nonprofit that empowers women to achieve economic independence by providing a network of support professional attire and the development tools to help women…

—
6
Women Empowering Women for the Next Generation Ministries

Our mission is to provide services and resources to help individuals in their personal growth, to become self-sufficient in every area of their life. WEW, Inc., provides services that include life skills training, basic essential needs…

Education
7
We Lift You Up

Encourage cancer survivors to seek the support and camaraderie of other cancer survivors, so that they can find their strength, purpose and passion through our empowering, life-skill building activities.

Human Services
8
Dress for Success Denver

To empower women to achieve economic independence by providing a network of support, professional attire and development tools to help women thrive in work and in life.

Public Benefit
9
Dress for Success Oregon

Empower women to achieve economic independence by providing a network of support, professional attire and tools to help them thrive in work and in life

Human Services
10
Dress for Success Louisville Inc

Dress for success louisville is a women and teens empowerment non-profit 501(c)(3) organization. our mission is to empower women to achieve economic independence by providing a network of support, professional attire and development tools…

Human Services
11
Grace Collective

Grace Collective is a nonprofit that offers hope and opportunity for lasting change to women survivors of poverty and exploitation. We do this by fostering a community of grace and holistic care where women learn job and life skills that…

Employment
12
Custom Fit Kids

to help working parents have affordable child care

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is EDU4LIFE; the most unlike its peers is Southern Colorado Construction Career Day Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

47 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 47 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
41/47
Grantees still filing
26/47
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YOUNG LADIES OF OUR FUTURE: $26,044 · Human ServicesYOUNG LADIES OF OUR FUTURECLOTHES TO KIDS OF DENVER INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesCLOTHES TO KIDS OF DENVER INCSTEPS Inc: $6,000 · Human ServicesSTEPS IncTHE SINGLETONS: $6,000 · Human ServicesTHE SINGLETONSMy Sisters Closet of Monroe County: $6,000 · Human ServicesMy Sisters Closet of Monroe Cou…RAISINGHOPE INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesRAISINGHOPE INCOCJ KIDS: $6,000 · Human ServicesOCJ KIDSHEARTSPACE KIDS INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesHEARTSPACE KIDS INCCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $6,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERJAMES RESOURCE NETWORK: $6,000 · Human ServicesJAMES RESOURCE NETWORKWISEPLACE: $6,000 · Human ServicesWISEPLACEKIDS MOBILITY NETWORK INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesKIDS MOBILITY NETWORK INCYANAM2M: $6,000 · Human ServicesYANAM2MCHARITYS HOPE: $6,000 · OtherEMPOWERING OUR YOUTH FOUNDATION: $6,000 · OtherYOUNG ENTREPRENEURS BUSINESS PROGRAMS: $6,000 · OtherTHE JAMES STOREHOUSE INCORPORATED: $6,000 · OtherUNIFORMS FOR HOPE: $6,000 · OtherHEAVENLY MIMI INC: $6,000 · OtherDAYBREAK - AN ADULT DAY PROGRAM: $6,000 · OtherCARITAS SMILE: $6,000 · OtherRETOUCH INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES: $6,000 · OtherGIGIS PLAYHOUSE INC: $6,000 · OtherCHILDREN FIRST FOR OREGON: $6,000 · OtherBryson's Chase Foundation: $6,000 · OtherWESTERN NEVADA COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $6,000 · OtherPENNY'S PLACE: $6,000 · OtherSTIGMA-FREE SOCIETY: $6,000 · OtherCOVERED CORPORATION: $6,000 · OtherThe New Horizons Foundation Inc: $6,000 · OtherBLUE LINE BEARS INC: $11,922 · OtherBLUE LINE BEARS INCBackpack Society: $6,000 · OtherWorking Wardrobes For A New Start: $6,000 · OtherCHARITABLE VENTURES OF ORANGE COUNTY: $6,000 · OtherFriends of the Great Commission: $6,000 · OtherBCC EVOLUTION: $6,000 · HealthBCC EVOLUTIONTHE CARE PROJECT INC: $6,000 · HealthTHE CARE PROJ…THE TINY MIRACLES FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 · HealthTHE TINY MIRA…BUMBLEBEE FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 · HealthBUMBLEBEE FOU…Mindfulness and Positivity Project: $6,000 · HealthMindfulness a…THE OVARIAN CANCER CIRCLE: $6,000 · HealthTHE OVARIAN C…Check For a Lump: $6,000 · HealthCheck For a L…TEXTILES WEST: $6,000 · Arts & CultureRocky Mountain Womens Film Institute: $6,000 · Arts & CultureWOMEN & FAMILY LIFE CENTER INC: $6,000 · Arts & CultureARTS & LEARNING CORPORATION: $6,000 · Arts & CultureALIVE AT LAST: $6,000 · Crime & LegalBULLYING RECOVERY RESOURCE CENTER: $6,000 · Crime & LegalEDU4LIFE: $6,000 · Crime & LegalTHE DIGNITY PROJECT: $6,000 · EducationFinancial Literacy First: $6,000 · EducationThe Green Thumb Initiative Inc: $6,000 · EducationSOUTHERN COLORADO CONSTRUCTION CAREER DAY FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 · Youth DevelopmentElevating Connections: $6,000 · Youth Development
Human Services$98,044Other$137,922Health$42,000Arts & Culture$24,000Crime & Legal$18,000Education$18,000Youth Development$12,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBLUE LINE BEARS INC: $11,922 over 1y, 12% of budgetCLOTHES TO KIDS OF DENVER INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSOUTHERN COLORADO CONSTRUCTION CAREER DAY FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetSTEPS Inc: $6,000 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetTEXTILES WEST: $6,000 over 1y, 9.3% of budgetBCC EVOLUTION: $6,000 over 1y, 7.9% of budgetBackpack Society: $6,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetWorking Wardrobes For A New Start: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SINGLETONS: $6,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetALIVE AT LAST: $6,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetBULLYING RECOVERY RESOURCE CENTER: $6,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetEMPOWERING OUR YOUTH FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetTHE DIGNITY PROJECT: $6,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetMy Sisters Closet of Monroe County: $6,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetCOVERED CORPORATION: $6,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetRAISINGHOPE INC: $6,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetElevating Connections: $6,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetFinancial Literacy First: $6,000 over 1y, 23% of budgetCHARITABLE VENTURES OF ORANGE COUNTY: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOCJ KIDS: $6,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHEARTSPACE KIDS INC: $6,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetYOUNG ENTREPRENEURS BUSINESS PROGRAMS: $6,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetWOMEN & FAMILY LIFE CENTER INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTHE JAMES STOREHOUSE INCORPORATED: $6,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $6,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetThe Green Thumb Initiative Inc: $6,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetUNIFORMS FOR HOPE: $6,000 over 1y, 7.2% of budgetARTS & LEARNING CORPORATION: $6,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetJAMES RESOURCE NETWORK: $6,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetThe New Horizons Foundation Inc: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWISEPLACE: $6,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDAYBREAK - AN ADULT DAY PROGRAM: $6,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetEDU4LIFE: $6,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetFriends of the Great Commission: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TINY MIRACLES FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCHILDREN FIRST FOR OREGON: $6,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetBUMBLEBEE FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetMindfulness and Positivity Project: $6,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetTHE OVARIAN CANCER CIRCLE: $6,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetCheck For a Lump: $6,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetWESTERN NEVADA COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives Founda…The Richard M Schulze…Network for GoodJpmorgan Chase Founda…Natl Christian Charit…Charities Aid Foundat…The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…The Blackbaud Giving …Paypal Charitable Giv…Morgan Stanley Global…National Philanthropi…
Colorado Gives FoundationCO18.4× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Network for Good · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ewomennetwork Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ewomennetwork Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 18%
  • Steps Inc: 18% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ewomennetwork’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home