Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Ewomennetwork Foundation

The organization's mission is to support not-for-profit health, wellness, and safety initiatives that help underpriviledged women throughout the world meet their challenges to cope, grow, and heal.

$106k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$90kHuman Services$78kYouth Development$56kArts & Culture$18kEducation$18kCrime & Legal$18kInternational$12kEmployment$12kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 12 grants below total $72,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $106,336 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $34,336 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$6,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$100k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIFORMS FOR HOPE$6,000
GIGI'S PLAYHOUSE SAN DIEGO$6,000
BACKPACK SOCIETY$6,000
MAKE MENTAL HEALTH MATTER$6,000
THE SINGLETONS$6,000
THE TINY MIRACLES FOUNDATION$6,000
SOUTHERN NEVADA CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER$6,000
JACKIE'S WAR$6,000
SOUTHERN COLORADO CONSTRUCTION CAREER DAYS FOUNDATION$6,000
BROKEN ARROW WRANGLERS$6,000
THE DIGNITY PROJECT DBA WELL GROUNDED COFFEE COMMUNITY$6,000
THE OVARIAN CANCER CIRCLE$6,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $98k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 69% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%YOUNG LADIES OF OUR FUTURE INC: $26k → 20%MY SISTERS CLOSET OF MARYLAND: $6k → 14%STEPS INC: $6k → 9%YANAM2M: $6k → 3%JAMES RESOURCE NETWORK: $6k → 12%SOUTHERN NEVADA CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $6k → 13%OCJ KIDS: $6k → 11%RAISING HOPE: $6k → 10%WISEPLACE: $6k → 10%THE SINGLETONS: $6k → 11%CLOTHES TO KIDS OF DENVER: $6k → 12%KID'S MOBILITY NETWORK: $6k → 8%HEARTSPACE KIDS INC: $6k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
ID
NY
OR
NV
CT
RI
CA
CO
VA
MD
AZ
DC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 21% of Ewomennetwork Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 5% of the giving stays in TX; read by stated purpose it is 22% — more of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Ewomennetwork Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 5.1% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Colorado Wellness Center for Girls
—
2
Blessings Working Together Inc

Provide counseling and life skills

Human Services
3
Cornerstone Connections

The mission of Cornerstone Connections is to connect and provide individuals and families with quality resources, services, trainings, and support that will foster them into leading viable lives.

—
4
Building U

Educating and supporting young people to manage money effectively so that they can become financially stable, build assets and achieve their personal and entrepreneurial goals

Community Improvement
5
Dress for Success Sacramento

Dress for Success Sacramento is an affiliate of Dress for Success Worldwide a nonprofit that empowers women to achieve economic independence by providing a network of support professional attire and the development tools to help women…

—
6
Women Empowering Women for the Next Generation Ministries

Our mission is to provide services and resources to help individuals in their personal growth, to become self-sufficient in every area of their life. WEW, Inc., provides services that include life skills training, basic essential needs…

Education
7
We Lift You Up

Encourage cancer survivors to seek the support and camaraderie of other cancer survivors, so that they can find their strength, purpose and passion through our empowering, life-skill building activities.

Human Services
8
Dress for Success Denver

To empower women to achieve economic independence by providing a network of support, professional attire and development tools to help women thrive in work and in life.

Public Benefit
9
Dress for Success Oregon

Empower women to achieve economic independence by providing a network of support, professional attire and tools to help them thrive in work and in life

Human Services
10
Dress for Success Louisville Inc

Dress for success louisville is a women and teens empowerment non-profit 501(c)(3) organization. our mission is to empower women to achieve economic independence by providing a network of support, professional attire and development tools…

Human Services
11
Grace Collective

Grace Collective is a nonprofit that offers hope and opportunity for lasting change to women survivors of poverty and exploitation. We do this by fostering a community of grace and holistic care where women learn job and life skills that…

Employment
12
Custom Fit Kids

to help working parents have affordable child care

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is EDU4LIFE and the most unlike its peers is Southern Colorado Construction Career Day Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 14 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr14%33%5–10yr19%38%10–20yr16%18%20–35yr13%7%35–55yr16%2%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%2%<5yr14%39%5–10yr19%35%10–20yr16%16%20–35yr13%6%35–55yr16%2%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
4%2/53
the rest of the field
13%
240,394/1,819,512

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

47 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 47 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
41/47
Grantees still filing
26/47
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

YOUNG LADIES OF OUR FUTURE — $26,044 · Human ServicesYOUNG LADIES OF OUR FUTURECLOTHES TO KIDS OF DENVER INC — $6,000 · Human ServicesCLOTHES TO KIDS OF DENVER INCSTEPS Inc — $6,000 · Human ServicesSTEPS IncTHE SINGLETONS — $6,000 · Human ServicesTHE SINGLETONSOCJ KIDS — $6,000 · Human ServicesOCJ KIDSHEARTSPACE KIDS INC — $6,000 · Human ServicesHEARTSPACE KIDS INCRAISINGHOPE INC — $6,000 · Human ServicesRAISINGHOPE INCMy Sisters Closet of Monroe County — $6,000 · Human ServicesMy Sisters Closet of Monroe Cou…WISEPLACE — $6,000 · Human ServicesWISEPLACECHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER — $6,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERJAMES RESOURCE NETWORK — $6,000 · Human ServicesJAMES RESOURCE NETWORKKIDS MOBILITY NETWORK INC — $6,000 · Human ServicesKIDS MOBILITY NETWORK INCYANAM2M — $6,000 · Human ServicesYANAM2MGIGIS PLAYHOUSE INC — $6,000 · OtherEMPOWERING OUR YOUTH FOUNDATION — $6,000 · OtherBryson's Chase Foundation — $6,000 · OtherUNIFORMS FOR HOPE — $6,000 · OtherYOUNG ENTREPRENEURS BUSINESS PROGRAMS — $6,000 · OtherCHILDREN FIRST FOR OREGON — $6,000 · OtherHEAVENLY MIMI INC — $6,000 · OtherTHE JAMES STOREHOUSE INCORPORATED — $6,000 · OtherDAYBREAK - AN ADULT DAY PROGRAM — $6,000 · OtherSTIGMA-FREE SOCIETY — $6,000 · OtherRETOUCH INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES — $6,000 · OtherCHARITYS HOPE — $6,000 · OtherCARITAS SMILE — $6,000 · OtherWESTERN NEVADA COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $6,000 · OtherPENNY'S PLACE — $6,000 · OtherCOVERED CORPORATION — $6,000 · OtherThe New Horizons Foundation Inc — $6,000 · OtherBLUE LINE BEARS INC — $11,922 · OtherBLUE LINE BEARS INCBackpack Society — $6,000 · OtherWorking Wardrobes For A New Start — $6,000 · OtherCHARITABLE VENTURES OF ORANGE COUNTY — $6,000 · OtherFriends of the Great Commission — $6,000 · OtherBCC EVOLUTION — $6,000 · HealthBCC EVOLUTIONTHE OVARIAN CANCER CIRCLE — $6,000 · HealthTHE OVARIAN C…THE CARE PROJECT INC — $6,000 · HealthTHE CARE PROJ…THE TINY MIRACLES FOUNDATION INC — $6,000 · HealthTHE TINY MIRA…BUMBLEBEE FOUNDATION INC — $6,000 · HealthBUMBLEBEE FOU…Mindfulness and Positivity Project — $6,000 · HealthMindfulness a…Check For a Lump — $6,000 · HealthCheck For a L…Rocky Mountain Womens Film Institute — $6,000 · Arts & CultureTEXTILES WEST — $6,000 · Arts & CultureARTS & LEARNING CORPORATION — $6,000 · Arts & CultureWOMEN & FAMILY LIFE CENTER INC — $6,000 · Arts & CultureALIVE AT LAST — $6,000 · Crime & LegalBULLYING RECOVERY RESOURCE CENTER — $6,000 · Crime & LegalEDU4LIFE — $6,000 · Crime & LegalTHE DIGNITY PROJECT — $6,000 · EducationThe Green Thumb Initiative Inc — $6,000 · EducationFinancial Literacy First — $6,000 · EducationSOUTHERN COLORADO CONSTRUCTION CAREER DAY FOUNDATION INC — $6,000 · Youth DevelopmentElevating Connections — $6,000 · Youth Development
Human Services$98,044Other$137,922Health$42,000Arts & Culture$24,000Crime & Legal$18,000Education$18,000Youth Development$12,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBLUE LINE BEARS INC — $11,922 over 1y, 12% of budgetCLOTHES TO KIDS OF DENVER INC — $6,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSOUTHERN COLORADO CONSTRUCTION CAREER DAY FOUNDATION INC — $6,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetSTEPS Inc — $6,000 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetBackpack Society — $6,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetTEXTILES WEST — $6,000 over 1y, 9.3% of budgetBCC EVOLUTION — $6,000 over 1y, 7.9% of budgetTHE SINGLETONS — $6,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetALIVE AT LAST — $6,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetEMPOWERING OUR YOUTH FOUNDATION — $6,000 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetBULLYING RECOVERY RESOURCE CENTER — $6,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetTHE DIGNITY PROJECT — $6,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetWorking Wardrobes For A New Start — $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOVERED CORPORATION — $6,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetOCJ KIDS — $6,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHEARTSPACE KIDS INC — $6,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetRAISINGHOPE INC — $6,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetElevating Connections — $6,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetMy Sisters Closet of Monroe County — $6,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetTHE OVARIAN CANCER CIRCLE — $6,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetARTS & LEARNING CORPORATION — $6,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetUNIFORMS FOR HOPE — $6,000 over 1y, 7.2% of budgetYOUNG ENTREPRENEURS BUSINESS PROGRAMS — $6,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCHILDREN FIRST FOR OREGON — $6,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetThe Green Thumb Initiative Inc — $6,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetTHE JAMES STOREHOUSE INCORPORATED — $6,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE TINY MIRACLES FOUNDATION INC — $6,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetThe New Horizons Foundation Inc — $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN & FAMILY LIFE CENTER INC — $6,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetWISEPLACE — $6,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetEDU4LIFE — $6,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetDAYBREAK - AN ADULT DAY PROGRAM — $6,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER — $6,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetJAMES RESOURCE NETWORK — $6,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetBUMBLEBEE FOUNDATION INC — $6,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetMindfulness and Positivity Project — $6,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetCHARITABLE VENTURES OF ORANGE COUNTY — $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWESTERN NEVADA COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $6,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCheck For a Lump — $6,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetFriends of the Great Commission — $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFinancial Literacy First — $6,000 over 1y, 23% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives Founda…The Richard M Schulze…Network for GoodJpmorgan Chase Founda…Natl Christian Charit…Charities Aid Foundat…The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…The Blackbaud Giving …Paypal Charitable Giv…Morgan Stanley Global…National Philanthropi…
Colorado Gives FoundationCO18.4× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Network for Good · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ewomennetwork Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 18%
  • Steps Inc — 18% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home