Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Every Mother Counts

EVERY MOTHER COUNTS is a non-profit organization dedicated to making pregnancy and childbirth safe, respectful, and equitable for everyone, everywhere.

$3.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
40
Grants FY2024still arriving
18
States reached
$335k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$7.9MInternational$2.9MHuman Services$910kCrime & Legal$490kPublic Safety & Disaster$89kCommunity Improvement$85kPhilanthropy$70kEducation$65kOther$0
02FY2024 · 40 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 40 grants below total $2,822,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $3,095,500 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $273,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k16 grants · $448k
  • $50k–250k23 grants · $2.0M
  • $250k+1 grant · $335k
$55,000
Median grant
18
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JUSTBIRTH SPACE INC$335,000
MIDWIVES FOR HAITI$180,000
COMMONSENSE CHILDBIRTH$155,000
LWALA COMMUNITY ALLIANCE$150,000
RESIST INC (NAME NEIGHBORHOOD BIRTH CENTER)$130,000
PROJECT MOTHERPATH INC (NAME MAGNOLIA BIRTH HOUSE & ROOTS COMMUNITY BIRT$130,000
FOUNDATION FOR AFRICAN MEDICINE AND EDUCATION$120,000
ONE HEART WORLDWIDE$100,000
MAYA MIDWIFERY INTERNATIONAL$95,000
BABY CAKES AND BRUNCH (NAME SHADES OF BLUE PROJECT)$85,000
HELUNA HEALTH (NAME SISTERWEB)$80,000
CHANGING WOMAN INITIATIVE$80,000
UZAZI VILLAGE$75,000
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION (NAME SF PREGNANCY FAMI$75,000
NAZDEEK INC$75,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $1.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 83% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MONARCH MIDWIVES (NAME LUNA TIERRA CASA DE PARTOS): $30k → 11%COMMUNITY FOR CHILDREN: $55k → 23%ARKANSAS COALITION OF MARSHALLESE: $10k → 14%ARKANSAS BIRTHING PROJECT: $25k → 17%MAMATOTO VILLAGE: $65k → 14%PROJECT MOTHERPATH INC (NAME MAGNOLIA BIRTH HOUSE & ROOTS COMMUNITY BIRT: $130k → 15%SISTER SONG INC: $50k → 13%TTAWAXT BIRTH JUSTICE CENTER: $30k → 17%ONE HEART WORLD WIDE: $100k → 11%COMMUNITY FOR CHILDREN INC: $55k → 23%MAMATOTO VILLAGE: $60k → 14%PROJECT MOTHERPATH INC (NAME ROOTS COMMUNITY BIRTH CENTER & MAGNOLIA BIR: $115k → 15%BLACK MAMAS MATTER ALLIANCE INC: $10k → 13%ONE HEART WORLDWIDE: $100k → 11%COMMUNITY FOR CHILDREN INC: $55k → 23%MAMATOTO VILLAGE: $55k → 14%PROJECT MOTHERPATH INC: $105k → 15%BLACK MAMAS MATTER ALLIANCE INC: $10k → 13%ONE HEART WORLDWIDE: $50k → 11%COMMUNITY FOR CHILDREN INC: $50k → 23%TEWA WOMEN UNITED: $55k → 12%MAMATOTO VILLAGE: $50k → 14%PROJECT MOTHERPATH INC: $60k → 15%BLACK MAMAS MATTERS ALLIANCE: $5k → 13%COMMUNITY FOR CHILDREN INC: $50k → 23%TEWA WOMEN UNITED: $55k → 12%PROJECT MOTHERPATH: $40k → 15%COMMUNITY FOR CHILDREN INC: $30k → 23%TEWA WOMEN UNITED: $55k → 12%MAMATOTO VILLAGE: $30k → 14%TEWA WOMEN UNITED: $50k → 12%TEWA WOMEN UNITED: $30k → 12%TEWA WOMEN UNITED: $20k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
WA
IL
MI
NY
MA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
DC
HI
OK
LA
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 36% of Every Mother Counts’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Every Mother Countslessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 25% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$11M · 34 repeat orgs$1.8M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.

34 repeat relationships — 24 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
26

Total granted

$11M
$997k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+8%

Still filing today

91%
81%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $789k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesInternationalCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • COMMONSENSE CHILDBIRTH INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.8M · revenue +340%
  • MF
    MIDWIVES FOR HAITI INC
    3× · 2021–2024 · $712k · revenue +8% · 43% of their budget
  • CW
    CHANGING WOMAN INITIATIVE
    6× · 2019–2024 · $665k · revenue +168% · 32% of their budget

Funded once

  • INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAID INNOVATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $108k · revenue +27%
  • BB
    BROOKLYN BIRTHING CENTER
    one grant, 2020 · $100k
  • BO
    Builders of The Highway Foundation Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $55k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mother Health International Incorporated

Reduce maternal mortality in low resource areas through education and healthcare infrastructure. Each program is a specific partnership with community led projects to improve quality of health care service delivery, improve systems and…

Health
2
Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation

Partners In Health (PIH) is a non-profit, global health organization that fights social injustice by bringing the benefits of modern medical science first and foremost to the most vulnerable communities worldwide. In Haiti, Malawi, Rwanda,…

Health
3
Herhealtheq Corp

Delivering devices and equipment to mid-to-low income countries, to target the prevention and detection of non-communicable diseases. This is specifically focused on impacting the lives of women.

International
4
Ubuntu Black Family Wellness Collective

Ubuntu Black Family Wellness Collective is a free and charitable clinic and social safety net. Ubuntu Black Family Wellness Collective serves Black pregnant and parenting mamas, their babies and children through community-based, holistic…

Health
5
Midwives Organized to Help Establish Self-Reliance Corporatio

Standard OB care makes most women feel like they don't have options when it comes to pregnancy. We are working to change that! We are passionate about educating women about their options, providing true informed consent about each test and…

Human Services
6
Southern Birth Justice Network

To provide midwife services and make the care accessible to all peoples - especially black, born, youth, immigrant, indigenous, lgbtq+, low income and other marginalized communities.

Human Services
7
Global Midwife Education Foundation

Global midwife education foundation's mission is to reduce infant mortality and morbidity in rural areas of the developing world.

Health
8
Black Birth Justice Inc

Advocating for maternal health rights and providing superior support for postpartum persons. Our vision is to combat the Maternal and Infant mortality rate . Our focus is to protect the birthing people of the Black community with…

Health
9
Global Perinatal Services

To create culturally responsive pregnancy and parenting experiences for Blak, immigrant, and refugee families.

Human Services
10
Maternal Help Hope Fund

Maternal Health Foundation is dedicated to treatment and prevention of childbirth injuries by building sustainable capacity with local partners in Sub-Saharan Africa supporting world-renowned doctors, researchers and hospitals that treat…

Health
11
Global Health Promise

Advocate for and support women in sex work and their children.

Health
12
Mali Health Organizing Project Inc

Mali Health improves maternal and child health by supporting women, communities, and the community health system to develop local solutions that ensure every mother and child has access to quality primary care. We aim to end preventable…

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is One Heart Worldwide and the most unlike its peers is Bay Eye Charitable Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyChristian Missionary Organi…Health Access Advocacy and …Policy Research and AdvocacyCommunity FoundationsWomen & Girls Leadership De…Faith-Based Social ServicesImmigrant Worker SupportLgbtq+ Community SupportEnvironmental Conservation …Pregnancy Support Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 14 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%8%<5yr14%21%5–10yr19%30%10–20yr16%23%20–35yr13%12%35–55yr16%6%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%4%<5yr14%20%5–10yr19%32%10–20yr16%34%20–35yr13%5%35–55yr16%5%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%2/75
the rest of the field
13%
240,394/1,819,490

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

70 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 70 of the 75 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

12
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
64/70
Grantees still filing
39/70
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

COMMONSENSE CHILDBIRTH INC — $1,751,722 · HealthCOMMONSENSE CHILDBIRTH INCMIDWIVES FOR HAITI INC — $712,000 · HealthMIDWIVES FOR HAITI INCCHANGING WOMAN INITIATIVE — $665,000 · HealthCHANGING WOMAN INITIATIVEHope Foundation for Women Child of Bangladesh Inc — $650,000 · HealthHope Foundation for Women Child of Bangladesh IncMAYA MIDWIFERY INTERNATIONAL INC — $425,000 · HealthMAYA MIDWIFERY INTERNATIONAL INCBUMI SEHAT FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL INC — $335,000 · HealthJUSTBIRTH SPACE INC — $335,000 · HealthUzazi Village — $305,000 · HealthVillage Birth International — $265,000 · Health+21 more — $1,164,000 · Health+21 morePROJECT MOTHERPATH INC — $450,000 · Human ServicesPROJECT MOTHERP…COMMUNITY FOR CHILDREN — $295,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY FOR C…TEWA WOMEN UNITED — $265,000 · Human ServicesTEWA WOMEN UNIT…MAMATOTO VILLAGE INC — $260,000 · Human ServicesMAMATOTO VILLAG…ONE HEART WORLDWIDE — $250,000 · Human ServicesONE HEART WORLD…SISTERSONG INC — $75,000 · Human Services+6 more — $180,000 · Human Services+6 moreFOUNDATION FOR AFRICAN MEDICINE AND EDUC — $555,000 · InternationalFOUNDATION FOR…Lwala Community Alliance — $455,000 · InternationalLwala Communit…NAZDEEK INC — $395,500 · InternationalNAZDEEK INCGlobal Response Management Inc — $172,500 · InternationalGlobal Respons…+4 more — $95,000 · International+4 morePUBLIC HEALTH FOUNDATION ENTERPRISES INC — $420,000 · OtherPUBLIC HEALTH…Circle of Health International — $170,075 · OtherCircle of Hea…NEIGHBORHOOD BIRTH CENTER — $130,000 · OtherNEIGHBORHOOD …BROOKLYN BIRTHING CENTER — $100,000 · OtherBROOKLYN BIRT…RESIST INC — $100,000 · OtherRESIST INCANCIENT SONG DOULA SERVICES — $67,500 · OtherBirthmark Doula — $60,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL — $55,000 · OtherMemphis Center For Reproductive Health Inc — $55,000 · OtherOPENCOLLECTIVE FOUNDATION — $80,000 · OtherOPENCOLLECTIV…Builders of The Highway Foundation Inc — $55,000 · Other+7 more — $200,000 · Other+7 moreBaby Cakes and Brunch — $280,000 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY OF HOPE — $255,000 · Community ImprovementELEPHANT CIRCLE — $295,000 · Crime & LegalDESIGNING JUSTICE DESIGNING SPACES — $55,000 · Crime & LegalUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION — $150,000 · EducationWomens Justice Initiative Inc — $65,000 · Education+1 more — $5,400 · Education
Health$6,607,722Human Services$1,775,000International$1,673,000Other$1,492,575Community Improvement$535,000Crime & Legal$350,000Education$220,400

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOMMONSENSE CHILDBIRTH INC — $1,751,722 over 8y, 25% of budgetMIDWIVES FOR HAITI INC — $712,000 over 3y, 43% of budgetCHANGING WOMAN INITIATIVE — $665,000 over 6y, 32% of budgetHope Foundation for Women Child of Bangladesh Inc — $650,000 over 2y, 50% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR AFRICAN MEDICINE AND EDUC — $555,000 over 4y, 9.4% of budgetLwala Community Alliance — $455,000 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetPROJECT MOTHERPATH INC — $450,000 over 5y, 31% of budgetMAYA MIDWIFERY INTERNATIONAL INC — $425,000 over 3y, 59% of budgetPUBLIC HEALTH FOUNDATION ENTERPRISES INC — $420,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNAZDEEK INC — $395,500 over 3y, 50% of budgetBUMI SEHAT FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL INC — $335,000 over 4y, 30% of budgetJUSTBIRTH SPACE INC — $335,000 over 1y, 70% of budgetUzazi Village — $305,000 over 5y, 9.8% of budgetELEPHANT CIRCLE — $295,000 over 4y, 9.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOR CHILDREN — $295,000 over 6y, 92% of budgetBaby Cakes and Brunch — $280,000 over 5y, 17% of budgetVillage Birth International — $265,000 over 5y, 72% of budgetTEWA WOMEN UNITED — $265,000 over 6y, 4.0% of budgetMAMATOTO VILLAGE INC — $260,000 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY OF HOPE — $255,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetONE HEART WORLDWIDE — $250,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetAccompany Doula Care Inc — $215,000 over 4y, 10% of budgetGlobal Response Management Inc — $172,500 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetCircle of Health International — $170,075 over 4y, 14% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION — $150,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL BIRTHING HOME FOUNDATION — $123,750 over 4y, 7.8% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR ADVANCEMENT OF HAITIAN MIDWIVES INC — $115,000 over 4y, 27% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR MEDICAID INNOVATION INC — $107,500 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetRESIST INC — $100,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLOUISIANA PERINATAL JUSTICE ALLIANC — $85,000 over 2y, 6.0% of budgetOPENCOLLECTIVE FOUNDATION — $80,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSISTERSONG INC — $75,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetWomens Justice Initiative Inc — $65,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetBuilders of The Highway Foundation Inc — $55,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetMedGlobal Inc — $55,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetOPERATION RESTORATION — $55,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetDESIGNING JUSTICE DESIGNING SPACES — $55,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetMemphis Center For Reproductive Health Inc — $55,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetRafiki Coalition For Health and Wellness — $50,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA BREASTFEEDING COALITION — $50,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHERN NEW ENGLAND INC — $45,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetToo Young to Wed Inc — $45,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetGRACE COMMUNITY BIRTH CENTER PROJECT INC — $33,750 over 1y, 24% of budgetNEW VENTURE FUND — $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC — $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNational Association to Advance Black Birth — $30,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetTULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJAMAA BIRTH VILLAGE — $30,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Groundswell FundWK Kellogg FoundationMs Foundation for Wom…Resist IncTara Health FoundationRockefeller Philanthr…Globalgiving Foundati…Amalgamated Charitabl…Together Women RiseImpactassetsincThe Burke Foundation …Skyline Foundation
Groundswell FundCA41.3× affinity18 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Groundswell Fund · WK Kellogg Foundation · Ms Foundation for Women Inc · Resist Inc · Tara Health Foundation · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · Globalgiving Foundation Inc · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Together Women Rise · Impactassetsinc · The Burke Foundation Inc · Skyline Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Every Mother Counts funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Tulsa Community Foundation — 11% of income from government
  • Planned Parenthood of Southern New England Inc — 10% of income from government
  • Resist Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Project Medishare for Haiti Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
18report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 75 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home